Widgets Magazine
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

  1. #1

    Default Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    I got to wondering, what's the combined cost of Scissortail Park, the convention center, the Omni Hotel, and the mixed use development wrapping around the parking garage? It has to be as a whole the most expensive area of development in the history of the city. Next to maybe Devon Energy Center

  2. #2

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    $777 million for all MAPS 3 projects combined.......originally budgeted.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    Would someone please explain why the entire $777 million should be an investment by taxpayers and not portions from a private developer, specifically the hotel & garage components? I understand government involvement in certain instances such as offering incentives for large employers, creating public-private entities like turnpikes, TIFs, UDBGs and the like, but why wasn’t private capital funding sought for at least part of this?

  4. #4

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    It was and is. The Park and Convention Center are fully city funded, because screw corporate ownership of our park and it makes no sense for our city convention center either, but the Omni Hotel and mixed use development around the garage are not fully taxpayer funded.

    Now, the $777 million for MAPS 3 in general is another question that only touches the first two of the above, and that was asked of and answered by the voters years ago. We're building our city back from a place where "we couldn't see our people wanting to live there" was the previous corporate response.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    Quote Originally Posted by CloudDeckMedia View Post
    Would someone please explain why the entire $777 million should be an investment by taxpayers and not portions from a private developer, specifically the hotel & garage components? I understand government involvement in certain instances such as offering incentives for large employers, creating public-private entities like turnpikes, TIFs, UDBGs and the like, but why wasn’t private capital funding sought for at least part of this?
    The hotel is not part of MAPs. But it is getting TIF money

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,697
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    Also I'm pretty sure Pete has provided numbers previously regarding the total investment due to MAPS projects (public funds from MAPS and private developer funds) and I thought the private investment had since outstripped the public investment.

  7. Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    the $777m number above is the combination of all of the C2S projects so far; park ($130m), cc($280m), hotel ($240m), garage (~$80m), and residences ($50m) as rough figures. It is only a coincidence that these projects also equal the entire cost of Maps 3. ..

    Park, CC, and Garage are city owned and funded by maps (garage funded by bonds iirc). The hotel is funded by $160m private, city $80m. Residences are private funded. This is a pretty damn good deal for the city, creating a true Convention district for 'only' about $480m in city investment. Granted there is streetcar coming by and bonds/TIF for utilities, etc; but this is all transformational and extends downtown like the original C2S master plan put forth by former Mayor Mick Cornett. Keep in mind there are other private investment in the area including the first-to-market Fairfield Inn and Suites. Not a bad return on investment by the city yet now OKC can truly compete with other tier 2 markets and offer itself as an alternative to many tier 1s or be a premium against tier 3s.
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  8. #8

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    I hate to even think what OKC would be today if not for maps.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,153
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCRT View Post
    I hate to even think what OKC would be today if not for maps.
    MAPS initiatives have revitalized Oklahoma City; increase sales revenue, economic & corporate growth, unprecedented housing development and a better cosmetic look for people who haven't been here in the last 25 years--would recognize a totally different city.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,153
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    The Convention Center District comprised of $288 million convention center, $40 million 550 space parking garage, $131 million DT Scissortail Park & $240 million Omni Hotel will infuse $700 million into the new district--these figures exclude the Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott and the streetcar route linking Bricktown.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,697
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    Um, who says we're calling this the convention center district?

  12. #12

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    [QUOTE=Laramie;1052266]$288 million convention center, $40 million 550 space parking garage/QUOTE]

    Almost $73,000 per parking space! All for things that sit passively 90% of the time. I guess I didn't realize how expensive garages are... I hope that we get smarter about commuting.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,153
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    Quote Originally Posted by shawnw View Post
    Um, who says we're calling this the convention center district?
    Nothing official yet.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,697
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Combined cost of the CC, hotel, park, and mixed use

    Well, I know it won't be a BID district anyway. At least there's been no indication of that in the board meetings so far. If you want the people to embrace a new district, better to go with something related to the park. I do agree we need to call it something other than "core to shore", but the park is what the area will be known for, and what we should want to attract attention to, NOT the convention center. The park will be there in 50 years. The convention center may not be.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What's the history of North Highland/Estes Park and College Park?
    By John_T in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-09-2016, 05:56 PM
  2. Biltmore Hotel (Hotel Oklahoma)*
    By Pete in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 11-15-2013, 02:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO