Possible lawsuit against city regarding alleged open meetings violations

[gopokes88]

Will he name himself in this lawsuit? I am sure over 7 years he has attended at least one private meeting.

This is so confusing why he would pick this time to do it. Frankly outside of a few people on this board, no one really cares about this parking garage, and since the agreement protects the rail right of way, even fewer have a beef.

I think it’s good that Pete is bringing this topic to light, but this seems a strange time to go to war with the city. I’m sure there’s a different topic which the public actually cares about. It helps having the public on your side.

The timing is likely because his term is up soon and he’ll be done as city councilor. This is kind of a, you come at the king you better not miss type situation. He does this from the start and fails, his political capital is spent and a lot of money aligns against him.

[catch22]

The timing is likely because his term is up soon and he’ll be done as city councilor. This is kind of a, you come at the king you better not miss type situation. He does this from the start and fails, his political capital is spent and a lot of money aligns against him.

True. But the garage is a terrible “shot”. No one cares enough about this issue.

[Jersey Boss]

True. But the garage is a terrible “shot”. No one cares enough about this issue.

The garage is a "vehicle" and a secondary issue. The primary issue is circumventing the open meetings act.