Widgets Magazine
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 67891011
Results 251 to 266 of 266

Thread: Innovation Link

  1. #251

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Quote Originally Posted by shawnw View Post
    Maybe starting with the widening of 10th can lead to more if it is well executed and received
    If they're going by reception, then they've already hit the negative mark with all the downgrades in the planning phase. They should've already started with the bottom half of the picture above. Building something up, then tearing it back down to add more to it is counterproductive and a total waste of funds. There's a reason why in every business, you get it done right the first time, because anymore times after are going to get increasingly more expensive.

    Throughout mankind's history, we've built to inspire further growth, be it a town, a business, a bridge, or even a legacy. What does it look like to locals if the city is only going to go through with the bare minimum of improvement without any thought to the future? You see it here on these forums every time they pave a street, then cut it back open to do some maintenance work on utilities within five months, have the road closed for four months, then open it back up with a simple patch job that turns into a pothole in three years or less. That's called being shortsighted, and I'd be pissed off as a tax payer to know that the city is blowing through some of my earnings to complete a project just to decomplete that same project within the year.

    If people saw the rendering of a simply widened bridge with plants on it, there would be so many complaints that this would still be in the drafting phase. Hence, don't put out anything like this if you know there's going to be a drastic reduction of this vision. All that does is piss people off of future projects that actually could be substantial and make them all the more cynical should something get puts in a render.

  2. #252

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Quote Originally Posted by HFAA Alum View Post
    I really wish they could've kept this plan instead of just widening the 10th Street bridge a few feet. Love the city, but some of the planners really do cut to the smallest dollar they can possibly pay. I'm willing to bet that they would've just expanded one side of the bridge if they felt they could get away with it publicly.
    But see they cut the plan back before this new federal money for reconnecting communities was approved so they need to revisit it. I’m sure we’re still a good 2-3+ years from this breaking ground.

  3. #253

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    But see they cut the plan back before this new federal money for reconnecting communities was approved so they need to revisit it. I’m sure we’re still a good 2-3+ years from this breaking ground.
    I sure hope they do. But knowing the state, they'll probably look to invest that money elsewhere.

  4. #254

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    I'd love to see the I-235 cap happen but I would need to be convinced that it is an appropriate use of the reconnecting communities funds. What communities are left that this cap would connect, particularly on the innovation district side of the highway?

  5. #255

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Arkansas got a grant to further their park cap over I-30 as part of the expansion project happening downtown. Granted it’s just to move it into study phase but it shows that there is money being given out from the infrastructure bill for park caps, specifically to help connect communities separated by freeways.

    https://www.kark.com/news/local-news...ark-over-i-30/

    It’d be better if we aimed for the original, more ambitious proposal.

  6. #256

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    $185 million to help connect neighborhoods severed by highways, infrastructure (gift link, should work for non-subscribers)

    Grants for the Reconnecting Communities program are starting to be awarded.

  7. #257

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    Arkansas got a grant to further their park cap over I-30 as part of the expansion project happening downtown. Granted it’s just to move it into study phase but it shows that there is money being given out from the infrastructure bill for park caps, specifically to help connect communities separated by freeways.

    https://www.kark.com/news/local-news...ark-over-i-30/

    It’d be better if we aimed for the original, more ambitious proposal.
    Kansas City has an initiative for a similar park cap over I-670 and I-35. They call it the "South Loop Link" or "South Loop Park Project".

  8. Default Re: Innovation Link

    I know we all want the cap over I-235 but there is another example I'd like to offer that cut the existing Black Community, I-35 from appx N 10th to around N 23rd.

    For all the stated reasons in the WP, I-35 and later I-235 were built and cut off black communities in OKC. The proposed "Innovation Link" cap isn't even in Deep Deuce or JFK but north of them. ... Again, I know we're looking for a modern cap over I-235 but the federal govt is looking to repair communities, and IMO the I-235 black community (you know, Deep Deuce+JFK) is beyond repair from a 'Black Community' prospective as it's in full gentrification. For that reason I don't think it will qualify for a Biden style grant but a ca[ at I-35 at the existing Black Community will.

    Anyway, just wanted to throw that out there after reading the WP article and concluding that OKC's I-235 Innovation Link cap isn't a community repair but a redevelopment of a gentrified community.
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  9. #259

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Quote Originally Posted by HOT ROD View Post
    I know we all want the cap over I-235 but there is another example I'd like to offer that cut the existing Black Community, I-35 from appx N 10th to around N 23rd.

    For all the stated reasons in the WP, I-35 and later I-235 were built and cut off black communities in OKC. The proposed "Innovation Link" cap isn't even in Deep Deuce or JFK but north of them. ... Again, I know we're looking for a modern cap over I-235 but the federal govt is looking to repair communities, and IMO the I-235 black community (you know, Deep Deuce+JFK) is beyond repair from a 'Black Community' prospective as it's in full gentrification. For that reason I don't think it will qualify for a Biden style grant but a ca[ at I-35 at the existing Black Community will.

    Anyway, just wanted to throw that out there after reading the WP article and concluding that OKC's I-235 Innovation Link cap isn't a community repair but a redevelopment of a gentrified community.
    What would fall in line to what you are describing is activating the rail line (as an addition to the streetcar) that runs just south of 1st street from Kelley under 235 through deep deuce over to EK Gaylord and up to connect at Broadway and 4th.

    This would activate the neighborhood that has been decimated with no investment and provide ease of access to both Deep Deuce, Bricktown, Downtown and Medical complex.

  10. Default Re: Innovation Link

    double post
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  11. Default Re: Innovation Link

    couldn't agree more and we should do that and the cap at 10th/I-235; just only stating the "Black Community" part of it no longer exists and that seems to be the basis of Biden's grants.
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  12. #262
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    5,226
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Tulsa got a $1.6 million grant to look into removing I-244 through Greenwood.

    https://tulsaworld.com/news/local/go...bd867d4f9.html

  13. #263
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,695
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Quote Originally Posted by HOT ROD View Post
    couldn't agree more and we should do that and the cap at 10th/I-235; just only stating the "Black Community" part of it no longer exists and that seems to be the basis of Biden's grants.
    Just stop the political trolling.

  14. Default Re: Innovation Link

    im not trolling just stating what appears to be a focus of the federal government that we can't live up to with the I-235 cap.
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  15. #265

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Quote Originally Posted by HOT ROD View Post
    im not trolling just stating what appears to be a focus of the federal government that we can't live up to with the I-235 cap.
    I think it is more about having a "compelling reason" of reconnecting cities divided.... Only three applications mention "minorities" and maybe 18/45 mention 'black" in reference to Race.

    DoT comment randomly selected by random number generator (in addition to Tulsa)
    Tulsa: The application provides a compelling depiction of how a historic Black neighborhood in Tulsa suffered the punishing effects of urban renewal and the building of I-244. The application hasclear community support and 20 support letters.

    Atlanta: This project could result in more transit, walking, and biking trips through prioritizing zero and lower carbon modes of travel within the project area. Additional private resources will go to events programming, curation of public art, and celebration of the history and legacy of the area that encapsulates the history of more than 24,000 individuals displaced in the construction and subsequent widening of the I-75/I-85 Downtown Connector

    Long Branch, NJ: Key design integrations in the project will include green spaces, illuminated art installations, and a mural and mosaic panel in the tunnel station connection that create an opportunity to celebrate local culture through visual art. Additionally, there will be a new plaza that will offer a community space to residents. A project labor agreement will ensure the creation of good-paying union jobs and workforce development initiatives focused on underrepresented groups will also be utilized.

    SLC: The project seeks to enhance active modes that reduce greenhouse gas emissions with the consideration for safe accommodation. The project provides substantial detail about partnerships with commitment letters. The city is creating a housing trust and, if new land is opened up, affordable housing would be a part of future redevelopment. The project intends to incorporate local art installations aligned with local vision.

  16. #266
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,695
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Innovation Link

    Quote Originally Posted by HOT ROD View Post
    im not trolling just stating what appears to be a focus of the federal government that we can't live up to with the I-235 cap.
    It isn’t about race, though that’s what you focused on. It is about the displacement and sadly many lower class and minority neighborhoods have been replaced with expressways tearing them apart. Less political resistance to ripping them up originally and depressed land prices to acquire.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Scott Rice Center for Workspace Innovation
    By Plutonic Panda in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-22-2014, 04:26 PM
  2. Francis Tuttle Business Innovation Center
    By Plutonic Panda in forum Edmond
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-24-2013, 06:00 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO