Widgets Magazine
Page 1 of 20 123456 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 500

Thread: Aubrey McClendon

  1. #1

    Default Aubrey McClendon

    Wow is all to be said.
    Aubrey McClendon indicted | News OK
    Aubrey McClendon has been charged by a federal grand jury with conspiring to rig bids for the purchase of oil and natural gas leases in northwest Oklahoma, the Department of Justice announced Tuesday.

    The indictment in Oklahoma City federal court alleges that McClendon orchestrated a conspiracy between two large oil and gas companies to not bid against each other for the purchase of certain oil and natural gas leases in northwest Oklahoma
    .

  2. #2

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    I wonder the possible penalties if convicted?

    Could jail time be involved?

  3. #3

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Half of me thinks he'll get off with a fine or something the other half thinks they wouldn't charge him without a rock solid case

  4. #4

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    If they have a rock solid case, I'm sure there will be some sort of plea agreement...

    Just wonder if jail time is a possibility in the worse case scenario.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    If they have a rock solid case, I'm sure there will be some sort of plea agreement...

    Just wonder if jail time is a possibility in the worse case scenario.
    Absolutely it would be. If the federal prosecutors want to make a point with McClendon and his shenanigans then they will not be offering plea deals that wouldn't include prison time. Madoff, Martha Stewart, and other white collar criminals didn't get a pass, though admittedly many do. I think when all is said and done, the DOJ will show him and his legal team a long list of things they could nail him on, only sought the most serious count and will follow through. I noticed the True Bill was sought by the Antitrust division of the Department of Justice. They don't mess around. Conspiracy to rig the system while running a public corporation is a serious offense. A lot of people swore this day would come. Here we are.

  6. Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Any word on who the other company/conspirator is? According to the indictment, it's another OKC-based company.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    If they have a rock solid case, I'm sure there will be some sort of plea agreement...

    Just wonder if jail time is a possibility in the worse case scenario.
    I haven't read the indictment yet to know the specific charges, but as the DOJ's press release says, each violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in jail and $1 million fine. I would be surprised if it came to that, but I suppose your worst case scenario is 10 years times each count for which he is convicted.

    My next two questions which may have more implications on the city/state are: 1) who is the other company involved in the conspiracy [Edit: liirogue beat me to this question.]; and 2) what will be the results of the following sentence from the DOJ's press release? "This is the first case resulting from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation into price fixing, bid rigging and other anticompetitive conduct in the oil and natural gas industry"

  8. #8

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    He is being charged with some very serious violations of the Sherman Act.

    "Beginning at least as early as December 2007 and continuing until at least as late as March 2012, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in the Western District of Oklahoma, the defendant, AUBREY K. McCLENDON, and his co-conspirators knowingly interred into and was in unreasonable restraint of interstate commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1)."

    From the DOJ:

    "Violation of the Sherman Act is a felony punishable by a fine of up to $10 million for corporations, and a fine of up to $350,000 or 3 years imprisonment (or both) for individuals, if the offense was committed before June 22, 2004. If the offense was committed on or after June 22, 2004, the maximum Sherman Act fine is $100 million for corporations and $1 million for individuals, and the maximum Sherman Act jail sentence is 10 years. Under some circumstances, the maximum potential fine may be increased above the Sherman Act maximums to twice the gain or loss involved. In addition, collusion among competitors may constitute violations of the mail or wire fraud statute, the false statements statute, or other federal felony statutes, all of which the Antitrust Division prosecutes."


    "In addition to receiving a criminal sentence, a corporation or individual convicted of a Sherman Act violation may be ordered to make restitution to the victims for all overcharges. Victims of bid-rigging and price-fixing conspiracies also may seek civil recovery of up to three times the amount of damages suffered."
    https://www.justice.gov/atr/price-fi...cation-schemes

  9. #9

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Thanks to all for the info.

    Holy cow, this is serious business.

    I'm sure they wouldn't bring charges if they didn't think they could prove them.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by Timshel View Post
    I haven't read the indictment yet to know the specific charges, but as the DOJ's press release says, each violation of the Sherman Act carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in jail and $1 million fine. I would be surprised if it came to that, but I suppose your worst case scenario is 10 years times each count for which he is convicted.

    My next two questions which may have more implications on the city/state are: 1) who is the other company involved in the conspiracy [Edit: liirogue beat me to this question.]; and 2) what will be the results of the following sentence from the DOJ's press release? "This is the first case resulting from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation into price fixing, bid rigging and other anticompetitive conduct in the oil and natural gas industry"
    Obviously, the Grand Jury will be handing down further indictments. Neither Company A or Company B are named as defendants. In a Chesapeake statement, they say this has been going on for some time and they have been cooperating with the federal investigation in return for leniency.

    “Chesapeake has been actively cooperating for some time with a criminal antitrust investigation by the Department of Justice regarding past land leasing practices and has received conditional leniency under the Antitrust Division’s Leniency Program...Chesapeake does not expect to face criminal prosecution or fines relating to this matter. Chesapeake has taken significant steps to address legacy issues and enhance legal and regulatory compliance throughout the organization." - Chesapeake Statement

    Another key: The Justice Department’s investigation is ongoing.

    Bloomberg has a good summary of what we know - so far.
    Ex-Chesapeake CEO McClendon Indicted Over Lease Bid Rigging - Bloomberg Business

  11. #11

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    ^

    Yes, that's the rub, isn't it?

    Aubrey is no longer at CHK and thus can't control what information was given to the investigators. The current CHK management -- who happen to be suing him for other alleged improprieties -- have every motivation to share everything in exchange for pinning any wrong-doing on McClendon and keeping themselves out of hot water.

    Looks like Chesapeake is not being charged at all.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by zookeeper View Post

    Another key: The Justice Department’s investigation is ongoing.
    My point with quoting the DOJ release is that it can be interpreted to state they are investigating other instances of lease bid rigging not related to this indictment and these parties. If true, which I'm not saying is the case or even likely, it could be an entirely different fish to fry.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Best original reporting on this story is right here:
    Former Chesapeake CEO McClendon charged with bid-rigging of land leases | Reuters

    "The Justice Department indictment paves the way for what may be one of the highest-profile criminal antitrust cases against a well-known U.S. CEO in decades, and could thrust McClendon, a controversial figure whose aggressive leasing tactics are legendary in the energy industry, into the highest-stakes legal battle of a decades-long career."

    "Chesapeake, SandRidge, and McClendon had previously disclosed in securities filings that they were being investigated by the Justice Department's Antitrust Division."

  14. #14

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    I wonder if Company B was SandRidge while under Tom Ward's watch?

    Chesapeake, SandRidge, and McClendon had previously disclosed in securities filings that they were being investigated by the Justice Department's Antitrust Division.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    I wonder if Company B was SandRidge while under Tom Ward's watch?
    I would think the next True Bill will be for Tom Ward. If only because McClendon can't engage in a conspiracy with himself and we know there is an Oklahoma City-based 'Company B'. Of course, it could always be others at Sandridge, but their relationship begs the speculation.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    From that Reuters article:

    The seven-page indictment alleges that McClendon set up a conspiracy of two energy companies which agreed not to bid against each other in purchasing oil and natural gas leases in northwest Oklahoma from 2007 to 2012. The indictment did not name either company.
    Ward left Chesapeake in 2006 and founded competitor SandRidge Energy Inc (SDOC.PK) the same year.
    Chesapeake, SandRidge, and McClendon had previously disclosed in securities filings that they were being investigated by the Justice Department's Antitrust Division.
    Tom Ward and McClendon were both deposed from their respective companies in 2013.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted


  18. #18

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post

    Tom Ward and McClendon were both deposed from their respective companies in 2013.
    You have to wonder if Sandridge is also availing themselves of the Antitrust Division’s Leniency Program. If so, with Ward being gone, they are both on the outside looking in at this point. Can you imagine McClendon knowing there's nothing he can do? At least until this all shakes out and he knows what all he will need to defend, something is actually out of his control.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    If I had to bet I would bet that CHK emerges relatively unscathed.

    On Aubrey, once again I'm conflicted I think he's smart enough to push that line without crossing it but I also know the DOJ's conviction rate is something ridiculous like in the 90+% range

  20. #20

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by gopokes88 View Post
    If I had to bet I would bet that CHK emerges relatively unscathed.
    The press release says that CHK will not be charged.

  21. #21

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Reading article in the Oklahoman, the time line printed indicates the other company involved may be Encana Corp and the leases were in Michigan.

  22. #22

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeepnokc View Post
    Reading article in the Oklahoman, the time line printed indicates the other company involved may be Encana Corp and the leases were in Michigan.
    That was for another anti-trust case already settled in the state of Michigan.

    This indictment is for leases in NW Oklahoma and specifically says Company B is based in OKC.

    I'm 99.9% sure it's SandRidge under Tom Ward.

  23. #23

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    That was for another anti-trust case already settled in the state of Michigan.

    This indictment is for leases in NW Oklahoma and specifically says Company B is based in OKC.

    I'm 99.9% sure it's SandRidge under Tom Ward.
    Thats what I get for reading the paper before my 2nd cup of coffee.

  24. #24

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Follow the Reuters coverage.

    They did all the original reporting on Chesapeake that led to McClendon getting ousted and that started this whole DOJ investigation in the first place.

    They had reporters based here for quite some time investigating all this as recent as late last year.

  25. #25

    Default Re: Aubrey McClendon indicted

    Quote Originally Posted by gopokes88 View Post

    On Aubrey, once again I'm conflicted I think he's smart enough to push that line without crossing it but I also know the DOJ's conviction rate is something ridiculous like in the 90+% range
    Aubrey isn't a banker so he's screwed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. American Energy Partners Business Practices (Aubrey McClendon)
    By metro in forum Businesses & Employers
    Replies: 459
    Last Post: 05-23-2016, 02:58 PM
  2. Aubrey McClendon speaks the truth
    By ou48A in forum Businesses & Employers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-28-2011, 12:17 PM
  3. Aubrey McClendon named the best-compensated CEO for 2008
    By AFCM in forum Businesses & Employers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-13-2009, 09:56 PM
  4. Aubrey McClendon increases ownership in KSBI
    By Nermel in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-17-2009, 05:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO