Widgets Magazine
Page 18 of 62 FirstFirst ... 1314151617181920212223 ... LastLast
Results 426 to 450 of 1528

Thread: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

  1. #426

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    The 7 houses on Barnes have been razed.








  2. #427

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Once again, great shots. Do you fly these from your back yard Pete?

  3. #428

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by rezman View Post
    Once again, great shots. Do you fly these from your back yard Pete?
    No, I always drive to sites so I can watch the drone with my eyes.

  4. #429

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    I guess this is a sign the developers are moving forward?

  5. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    I don't think so. I take it more of they don't want to deal with vacant dilapidated properties, and are going to get them reassessed to lower taxes.

  6. #431

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    They had forced out all the tenants in both the homes and the office park and the properties were becoming a nuisance to the neighborhood.

    Oak is in a holding pattern as they try to figure out how to go forward in phases.

  7. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Looks like the Oak Guys are trying to get their Miley Cyrus on.

    Lots of big equipment on location and red dust flying everywhere.

  8. #433
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,650
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    When I was by there yesterday, it looked like they were clearing the site of trees, etc.

  9. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    sounds like GOOD news to me.

    Hopefully OKC can get OAK looking somethning this (Kirkland, WA (Seattle Eastside) new Totem Lake):

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	170421totem-lake-brochure-2*1200xx1643-924-64-0.jpg 
Views:	137 
Size:	137.6 KB 
ID:	16539
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  10. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    by the way, Totem Lake used to look like the below and was dead for years until the above town hall masterplan was implemented (construction in 2019 iirc):


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	totemlakesmallseattlewa01B.jpg 
Views:	114 
Size:	73.0 KB 
ID:	16540
    old, boring, dead Totem Lake MALL
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  11. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    sorry for the 3 posts, but I so wish OAK can develop like Totem Lake and Penn Square could redevelop like Alderwood Mall (Lynnwood, WA [Seattle North]) or even better Northgate mall in N Seattle.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	picture5_orig.jpg 
Views:	127 
Size:	102.6 KB 
ID:	16541

    Alderwood mall (new outdoor shoppes fronting the main mall)


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	northgate-mall-02*1200xx997-562-0-107.jpg 
Views:	86 
Size:	94.4 KB 
ID:	16542
    New Northgate mall outdoor frontage shoppes

    by the way, both of these opened after 2016 and Northgate is getting a light rail station (I don't know if Alderwood is).

    but I hope OKC-OAK can develop like Totem and perhaps a few more of these mall-redevelopments like Northgate (great for Penn) or Alderwood (Quail, Crossroads). You no longer NEED department store anchors for regional mall success; today, you now need walkable frontage type shoppes and restaurants/hotels drawing customers to what's inside the rest of the traditional mall!

    Imagine OKC with OAK (similar to Totem Lake), Penn redeveloped (similar to Northgate), and 50-Penn truly realized as an upper posh boutique galleria (Gucci, Prada, LV) - all three next to each other in/near the highest income area of the state with BRT right there at Penn/NW Expressway!!

    Tell me that isn't doable, esp if it's phased built in the order like I presented!
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  12. #437

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Steve what are the chances of this still resembling the original renderings ?

  13. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by AlvarezK View Post
    Steve what are the chances of this still resembling the original renderings ?
    Zero percent, unless oil goes to $100+/bbl

  14. #439

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Why do you think a barrel of oil needs to be $100+?

  15. #440

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by kevin lee View Post
    Why do you think a barrel of oil needs to be $100+?
    I think you just need like 55-60 to see companies be stable again. Although I don’t think we will see growth of companies but rather companies be more financially stable. Which is better anyway

  16. #441

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    This city's economy is not nearly as reliant on oil as it used to be.

    Echoing the thoughts of a few other people further up the thread, I would hope that they complete it in 2-3 stages and come as close to the initial renderings as possible. They don't have nearly as much land to cover as Chisholm Creek, so it at least seems possible that they can pull it off at some point.

  17. #442
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,650
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Oil people always think it’s about them and oil. This is a casualty of Covid. It has caused developers to reconsider the mix of product in new developments. Less restaurants and bars, less retail, and maybe even less office demand.

  18. #443

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    ^

    And less hotels, as one was planned for this project.

  19. #444

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by AlvarezK View Post
    Steve what are the chances of this still resembling the original renderings ?
    Steve lol

  20. #445

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Given the recent vaccine news, I'm a little more optimistic that the people behind this project might be willing to wait 2-3 years and see how quickly the economy recovers. Of course the question is, how much are developers willing to see COVID as a one-off, versus a potential harbinger of future pandemics.

  21. #446

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Lol NO I DIDN’T

  22. #447

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Is this project still moving forward?

  23. #448

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Not anytime soon.

  24. #449

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    They keep posting on their social media sites, so that's a good sign I guess, lol?

  25. #450

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Building permits have been filed for the first phase of this project, which will consist of 320 apartments, 20,000 square feet of retail space on the ground floor, and a large parking structure in the center.

    The developers have acquired an additional 12 homes that will be demolished. 9 homes have already been razed.
































Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. NW Corner of 63rd & Penn
    By Pete in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-22-2014, 11:50 AM
  2. SE Corner of NW 23 and Penn
    By jpeaceokc in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-03-2013, 08:27 PM
  3. SE Corner of Hefner and Penn?
    By soonermike81 in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-24-2012, 07:44 PM
  4. SE Corner of NW 150th and Penn
    By diesel in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-16-2010, 07:34 PM
  5. Penn Square/50 Penn Place update
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 05-17-2007, 05:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO