Edit made.
The only thing I can see is that the two OTA workers who edited the documents need to be taught the difference between an Agenda and post meeting notes or minutes. Everything that was talked about in the meeting is contained in the original 5 pages. You don't typically see the details in the 35 page version in an Agenda.
I usually look for Occam's Razor in most situations and this is one of them. The easiest explanation is usually the correct one. Someone messed up.
I gotta admit, I am annoyed that I didn't think of doing an internet archive search in spite of going to the trouble of finding the posted agenda URLs.
The two internet archive links, for the record:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://pikepass.com/pdf/25January2022_Agenda.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20220000...2%20Agenda.pdf
I heard a rumor that the airport is not going to let the turnpike go across the west part of airport land shifting the connection between I 44 and airport road west. Has anyone heard this?
That would not surprise me, the airport has long had another theoretical parallel north/south runway that has been on master plans southwest of the current runways/taxiways (though like a mile offset, so think 74th to 104th for length estimate), that OTA probably thought looked like a fantastic width of open land for a highway. Who knows if it will ever be built, but that does not mean the airport's hope it might has died. Plus if FAA funds have been involved with acquiring that land might make that beyond the airports option to transfer if they wanted to.
I had heard from several people at the OTA the airport turnpike project was the most likely to undergo significant changes. If Hoffmeister wins the entire program might in jeopardy anyways as she said she’s against much of the proposed expansions.
Well it does encroach on their master plan so it is absolutely their duty to defend that.
However, this 3rd parallel runway will never be needed and if it did the master plan adopted by previous airport administrations was illogical and short sighted. The 3rd parallel runway always should have been immediately east of the airport where the current Portland Ave and ARINC, SkyWest, etc are. Hangars can go anywhere, they don’t immediate runway access. Runways are best closer together (but outside of runway spacing requirements of course). An aviation based approach would place that runway there, put the warehouses to that unused space on the south, and the retail and hotel plans on the north. Instead several previous airport admins have allowed consultants to pick the best site for retail and warehouses (Lariat Landing) which need no runway access: to dictate where the actual aviation uses need to go. And besides a Kum and Go, there is no retail in almost a decade since Lariat Landing broke ground. Just Amazon which again could go south of all of the runways and be in an equivalent interstate access position,
i'm not sure that it will make much of a difference... if the bonds are issued before the next term begins, there isn't much a new governor could do to stop it.
I hope that’s the case. But I don’t think all the bonds have been issued yet. It’ll be interesting to see what happens and sad that if she does win and cancels this expansion. Hopefully if she does win she’ll have a change of heart.
PS, I’m not endorsing any of these governors either way I just want to see these roads built. Lol
Stitt will probably survive. If national politics were different, OK voters wouldn't be as willing to look past his corruption. The weaknesses of our two party system will win out
^^^^ hopefully so. It will be nice when construction actually starts on the south OKC metro projects
Well the bond is up for debate in the courts....again. Something about the size of the bond being more than the law allows or something. I mean all the OTA has to do is split it in to two projects if that's the case. So i dont see this as anything other than a delay tactic. It's also entirely possible that they just build it anyway and charge a higher toll rate (that they will never decrease). So i dont think this will really change anything about the project.
The OTA has joined an app called PlusPass which allows you to manage your account and payment methods on it:
https://okcfox.com/news/local/oklaho...ss-mobile-app#
^^
I hope this works well. I had long been a PikePass customer but have always hated their online services. I finally got fed up with it and when the pikepass/tolltag interoperability thing started, I joined NTTA in north Texas. It has an extremely easy website and app for the phone to manage your account.
I hope that eventually, these toll apps get the ability to work nationwide. ie. Pay a toll in CO, it gets billed to your OK account, & vice versa.
It's supposed to be that way...
"This year marks the tenth anniversary of the landmark federal MAP-21 legislation that put a simple mandate to the toll industry, requiring that all federal-aid highway toll facilities implement technologies or business practices that provide for the interoperability of electronic toll collection by October 1, 2016 (four years after the enactment of the legislation)."
https://www.ibtta.org/blog/electroni...eparing-future (it's a tolling industry article, so it sheds light from their side on why the law hasn't been met, but it's still a good data source)
^^^ they don’t seem to be enforcing that initiative in any way shape or form. I’ll be more excited when the OTA becomes interoperable with FastTrak or EZPass(as sh!t as I think that system is).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks