Widgets Magazine
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

  1. #1

    Default 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

    I heard about a couple articles that summarize a study on US watersheds

    11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think - (discuses the major cities at most risk)

    Nearly One In 10 U.S. Watersheds Is 'Stressed'; Demand For Water Outpacing Supply - (more just general highlights)

    (Map indicating how stressed a watershed is to produce supply amount demanded)

  2. #2

    Default Re: 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

    Huffington Post. 'nuf said.

    What about the "11 cities that MAY NOT completely run out of water sooner than you think."

    And what is the difference between running out of water and completely running out of water?

    I make the motion that this be moved to Politics.

  3. #3

    Default Re: 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

    I don't understand how Cleveland made the list. The Great Lakes are fresh water - they have a plentiful source. Both Southern and Northern California have the option, though an expensive one, of desalination if push comes to shove. Same with Houston. I would say Salt Lake City, Phoenix, and Las Vegas are realistically the cities that have the most to be worried about.

  4. #4

    Default Re: 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

    Yeah, I wondered the same about Cleveland but then again I don't know squat about municipal water supplies.

  5. #5

    Default Re: 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

    Quote Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
    I don't understand how Cleveland made the list. The Great Lakes are fresh water - they have a plentiful source. Both Southern and Northern California have the option, though an expensive one, of desalination if push comes to shove. Same with Houston. I would say Salt Lake City, Phoenix, and Las Vegas are realistically the cities that have the most to be worried about.
    I thought a couple of those on their list seemed unlikely and had pretty significant rivers that flow by that went by untapped as a source of drinking/municipal water, I was guessing they might not have had rights or were just not a first option due to pollution or other quality issues but the topic overall was worth bringing up.

  6. #6

    Default Re: 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

    The analysis done by the author is a bit suspect as evidenced by his take on Miami.

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    I was guessing they might not have had rights...
    This is the case with Atlanta, although it wasn't mentioned in the section on Atlanta. Canton, a northern suburb, built their own lake to ensure the survival of their city but they went into so much debt building that they had to sell off all the water rights, and they still didn't cover the cost of construction. So now they have all the expense and none of the water. Lake Lanier is main source of drinking water for Atlanta but most of the water is accounted for by entities downstream, with Florida being the biggest rights holder. A few years ago Georgia tried to claim their border was incorrectly drawn and wanted to a lay claim to about a mile of the Tennessee River so they could draw water from it.

    Also, OKC should have been on this list.

  7. Default Re: 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

    Quote Originally Posted by tomokc View Post
    Huffington Post. 'nuf said.

    What about the "11 cities that MAY NOT completely run out of water sooner than you think."

    And what is the difference between running out of water and completely running out of water?

    I make the motion that this be moved to Politics.
    Huff Post isn't 100% political...same as Fox News. People that immediately shut down to either one should banish themselves to Politics.


    Quote Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
    I don't understand how Cleveland made the list. The Great Lakes are fresh water - they have a plentiful source. Both Southern and Northern California have the option, though an expensive one, of desalination if push comes to shove. Same with Houston. I would say Salt Lake City, Phoenix, and Las Vegas are realistically the cities that have the most to be worried about.
    I believe a lot comes down to infrastructure and also the fact that that area has been stressed with drought for the last few summers. For a time Lake Erie was running pretty low and there is only so much water they are allowed to pull from it.

  8. #8

    Default Re: 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

    We should be far more concerned about running out of water for our nations aquiculture than for our city’s.
    We can move people and business out of our city’s but you can not move our farm fields that need irrigation.

  9. #9

    Default Re: 11 Cities May Completely Run Out Of Water Sooner Than You Think

    Okc. Not so much

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2438
    Last Post: 08-08-2023, 03:56 PM
  2. 2 Oklahoma Cities make it on CNBC most affordable cities list
    By Plutonic Panda in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-31-2012, 09:37 AM
  3. And now for something completely different....
    By Steve in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-26-2011, 09:45 AM
  4. okctalk not completely functional in firefox?
    By CaptainAmerica in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-28-2006, 01:53 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO