Originally Posted by
Midtowner
It's not really absurd, but there may be some valid defenses here.
The law:
I'll tackle the two issues you raised here in order (whether you realized you raised 'em or not). First, whether this is protected speech under the First Amendment. Blackmail, as a rule, is one of the limited classes of speech which are not considered protected. Also, slander and libel are not protected, nor are "fighting words" and a number of of other things. There may be a First Amendment defense, but just looking at what I've read in the paper, especially considering the apparent admission by Gerhart that he had no evidence that anything had happened and couldn't prove the truth of it, what he was doing was threatening to commit a slanderous/libelous act unless he secured the good Senator's cooperation doesn't help his case at all.
Second, regarding Prater and the Pardon and Parole Board, plea negotiations for crimes are not the same as blackmail. It certainly might feel that way, but without plea negotiations, which are how 99% of our cases are resolved, our courthouses would literally grind to a halt.
What does the Highway Patrol have to do with anything? They highway patrol enforces the law on the capitol grounds. Since this threat apparently occurred on capitol grounds, they would have jurisdiction.
Bookmarks