Originally Posted by
PWitty
I never did get that one. Wow, so Aubrey used his knowledge of the natural gas industry to make personal investments in natural gas? How outrageous! You really think he is the only executive in the country who uses their knowledge of the industry they work in to make personal investments? The media can word a headline any way they want to try and get clicks on the article. Their whole premise was that CHK produced enough of the US's nat gas supply that he could use knowledge of CHK's upcoming operations to make money. Except Reuters said themselves that as far as they could tell he was long on nat gas the whole time and never changed his position. And just FYI CHK's 5% share of the US's nat gas production is not enough to single handedly influence the price of gas. There would never be a big enough shift on CHK's part to effect price unless all production ceased at once, and even then that would be iffy. There are so many factors that go into the price of nat gas besides CHK's production that its honestly hard to even take that accusation seriously.
And I'm not trying to defend AM. I just get tired of seeing people who are misinformed continually try and push their opinions on other people and pass them on as facts.
Bookmarks