Can't blame this flop on Buckland, or the Thunder. The Blazers drew 6500 their last year in existence. It's Funk Jr's baby. Even the savvy hockey fans fired up about the upgrade jumped off the sinking ship.
Can't blame this flop on Buckland, or the Thunder. The Blazers drew 6500 their last year in existence. It's Funk Jr's baby. Even the savvy hockey fans fired up about the upgrade jumped off the sinking ship.
Borchard wants to be in a league with Allen, texas, St Charles Missouri, Independence Missouri, and Brampton Canada.
those are huge thriving cities on the brink of getting a major league team.
Sorry we are better than A hockey... Last time the blazers were in town they had no affiliation with any nhl team or anything. It was an independent league, just like the independent leagues in baseball. Sorry I don't think the Sugarland skeeters are equivalent of the Tulsa drillers.
Maybe your boy Brad Lund can bring the blazers back at the state fair arena...
Im still on the ship. Having a great time. If it sinks so be it.
And right now, we're in a league with;
Abbotsford (Nope, sorry. They're leaving town)
Glens Falls, NY. Have you ever been there? I have. It's smaller than Durant.
Albany, NY. Woo Hoo! Capital city!
Bridgeport, CT
Binghamton, NY (It's the same size as Stillwater)
Manchester, NH (Now this is a BIG city. It's the size of Norman)
Portland (Maine, NOT Oregon. That WOULD be cool! But this one s a little bigger than Moore)
Based on what, exactly? And once again, the CHL is AA, NOT ASorry we are better than A hockey...
And your point?Last time the blazers were in town they had no affiliation with any nhl team or anything. It was an independent league, just like the independent leagues in baseball.
Nobody said they were. But you're not actually giving an apples-to-apples comparison.Sorry I don't think the Sugarland skeeters are equivalent of the Tulsa drillers.
The Blazers were the equivalent (minus the official affiliation, which you seem to lust after) of the Tulsa Drillers...AA
And btw, the Sugar land Skeeters averaged TWICE the attendance of the Oklahoma City Barons. Probably shouldn't have used them as an example, for a couple of reasons...
That would be fine with me. And I will bet you $10 right now (I'm cheap) that if he DID bring back the Blazers, AND they played at the fairgrounds (which wouldn't be my first choice) they would STILL outdraw the Barons.Maybe your boy Brad Lund can bring the blazers back at the state fair arena...
It was great when they revived the CHL in the early 90s--Dallas, Fort Worth, Memphis, Oklahoma City, Tulsa & Wichita. The NHL moved into the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex and the whole landscape of the league changed. The CHL started to spread out (Macon, GA). It wasn't the town but the nickname 'Whoopee;' was this about a musical or a play on words (Whoopee) sex or did Whoopi Goldberg own the team?
The league moved a franchise into Rio Grand Valley (Hidalgo, TX) a city the size of Guthrie, OK. We would have been better off having a 3rd Oklahoma CHL franchise in the Edmond-Guthrie area at the Lazy E arena; it would have saved on travel.
The American Hockey League does have some great known cities along with a few non popular ones.
Would Tulsa and/or Wichita have an 'impact' on the resurrection of ice hockey in OKC?
"Oklahoma City looks oh-so pretty... ...as I get my kicks on Route 66." --Nat King Cole.
I have a hard time believing some of those attendance figures. The Tulsa games that I've been to in the last few years have been horrendous. Seriously, that last Oilers/Thunder game I saw at the BOK looked like an open practice. How Tulsa still has a hockey team is a mystery.
We go to about 5 Barons game per season. We once looked at a 11 game mini season package. We may do it next year because our daughter enjoys the games. I think if the Barons went to a flat ticket rate and made the entire place GA and closed off the second level you'd get more folks at games, and maybe it'd feel like more people. I don't know, just a thought.
I don't have a dog in this fight, but the bring-back-the-Blazers crowd is starting to sound a little like the disgruntled Seattle basketball fans...
Here are other AHL teams that share a city with the NBA:
Lake Erie Monsters - 8144
Chicago Wolves - 7927 (Not only an NBA team, but an NHL team as well)
San Antonio - 7001
Charlotte Checkers - 6360
Toronto Marlies - 6013 (Not only have an NBA team, but an NHL team as well)
Milwaukee Admirals - 5844
Did the NBA not "change the landscape" in these places?
I think those CHL attendance numbers might be a little skewed. I remember the Blazers giving tickets away. PAID attendance if obtainable would be more telling. I myself would rather pay a few bucks more for a better product. If I want to see cheap club hockey I go see OU play at the Blazers Ice Centre or whatever it is called now.
When we lived in Stuttgart, we went to see the Stuttgart Wizards play. The smaller feel was incredible, and the players knew that those who came to see the game were real fans of the sport (or family!). The venue wasn't heated and one side wasn't even seating, but sort of a broad slow stairway where fans were expected to stand. They were sure to pay attention to the fans after each game. It was a wonderful fan experience (and it sure didn't hurt that you could get gluhwein cheaply there). On the other hand, the level of hockey was not near what you could get from the next level up (at the Bietigheim-Bissingen Steelers games further north) or from any higher caliber league.
I fully enjoyed the Blazers when they played here, and the roster continuity from an unaffiliated team was marvelous, but like Jersey Boss says, the AHL is a better product (and not really much more expensive, if you account for inflation).
Further, Jersey Boss is spot on with the attendance record being skewed with the ticket giveaways. I'm sure that if the Blazers were financially successful, they'd still be here, even if the Funk's wanted a higher level league affiliation.
A few of those places are not really debatable because there is a legit hockey culture (Lake Erie, Chicago, Toronto, Milwaukee) in place, and has been in place for years. We're NEVER going to compare to places where kids can go out and play pond hockey in the winters, that's a fact.
As for San Antonio (and Charlotte), I'm sure it doesn't hurt that they play in the same arena as the Spurs (and Bobcats), and have double the MSA of OKC. The NBA is not the only factor at play here.
Again, I'll ask you like I ask Edgar (who we are used to not answering questions on this site but only answering in vague generalities), what changed? It's still a black rubber round thing pushed around on ice with a carbon fiber stick.
You had passionate brand loyality with the Blazers, not sure why you'd toss that away except the oilies wanted to name a team after themselves. Thank God it's the Thunder and not the Barons like they dreamed. Not insulting all the old hockey fans in town would have helped. Balzer fans a blue collar beer drinking screaming at the opposition and ponuding on the glass ilk. The faith and family bs didn't help. I'll go to church if feel in need. Not condusive to a rowdy atmosphere. Blazer may have comped some tickets, but at least people actually used them. Sad thing about the Barons, every game their are piles of bought tickets no one cares enough to use. The upgrade could have been successful if you had soemone who knew what they were doing. If Funk eating the operating losses?
What's done is done. Time to move on.
thanks Dubya, still have a full roll at home.
How?!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks