It is the starting point of the negotiations...both sides go back and forth and meet somewhere in the middle to a mutually acceptable number...or go into the eminent domain thing...
But there ARE other places though, right? Just as with the COnvention Center/Cotton Mill, if the asking price is unacceptable, move on. I am against I.D. in general, especially when you are talking about government coming in and using it for a public want as opposed to a public need. Especially true when governments use it to buy property not for a public purpose (government buildings, parks etc) but turn around and sell it to private investors for development (like they might do on the properties surrounding the MAPS 3 Park). If you need to use I.D. for the Park land, that is one thing, but the properties surrounding it? NO.
And they put in $1 million of their own money for that too. The City's offer doesn't amount to that much of a profit. Have to factor in the amount of time they have owned the property, property value increases etc etc. When you do that, are they asking too much? Is the City low-balling? I don't know.
Re: Posts 41 thru 44: Amen, Brothers/Sisters.
Usually I cringe at the phrase "eminent domain" on account of the bad press it often gets . . . but in THIS case . . .
yeah. and eminent domain too! =)
this type of anti-communial BS crosses all "party lines" . . .
(metaphorically speakin', o' course):
Here's what should be just over the imminent virtual horizon of these pathetic money-grubbers' efforts to join the One-Percenters: They should be tarred, feathered, and run out of town ON A RAIL!!!!
(the irony itself is nearly overwhelming. is that a real train whistle that i hear in the distance? yes it is. =)
Say! Before Willam H. Macy leaves town, maybe someone could pitch him the concept of a Reality TV Show revolving around this issue! Loosely based on American Pickers . . . it could be called . . . American Dickers!
(btw: the photos of that lobby are beautiful. when someone got off the train, back in the day, they would have had a GREAT first impression of Oklahoma (city).)
Maybe the Hub should be moved one block South, accross from the hotel..? Or one block North ? Either would work.
according to the assessor's site, bricktown real estate llc paid $374,667 for the property in 1998. i'm not sure how much they've spent in restoring the building since then, but i'm positive $23.5m would give them an insane return on their investment. -M
Is this still on track for early 2015?
I was unable to go inside this time, but I got some exterior shots.
2/8/2015
Have they started work on the tunnel yet?
I honestly don't see how the Santa Fe Station could be the central hub for a metro lightrail system. It seems to me that the rails and the station itself is way too small to accommodate the amount of traffic that could potentially pass through there.
read this http://www.acogok.org/Programs_and_S...s/hubstudy.asp
clearly enough room .. and it wouldn't be light rail it would be used for commuter rail
The city needs to file an eminent domain case and just run with it.
Radical: I agree, the interior shots are great...would never guess from the outside, that that was on the inside.
The $2 million the city offered was clearly a lowball. The property is worth a lot more than that. Just because the Brewers invested wisely and bought a key piece of property early for a good price is no reason to screw them over. Of course the $23 million they countered with is just as crazy the other way.
They should get what the property is really worth. Eminent domain isn't intended to screw people out of their land, or to just give them back the money they invested. The Brewers should get fair market value. Both sides should negotiate in good faith. If the city starts screaming about eminent domain, that will reflect badly on them if this case goes on to court, especially if the Brewers can show that the property is much more valuable than the $2 million the city was initially offering. Then it looks like the city is using their power unjustly, and we might end up paying a lot more for it because of that.
And the owners can sue if they feel they are getting shortchanged in the deal. My point is that if the Brewers have invested $1M of their own funds and $1M in federal grants, that property may be worth quite a bit more than $2M. If the city pushes for ED seizure too quickly or without negotiating, it could come back to hurt them later. I am not against seizing it if that is what becomes necessary, but my preference would be a negotiated deal instead.
BTW, the City has used eminent domain multiple times in acquiring the land for Central Park and the process has seemed to move relatively quickly.
Negotiations are what needs to happen. Their low offer is just as bad as the high counter. In the article it said that an appraisal is coming soon and that will set some ground work in place of what some fair comps and income streams are worth. The city wants to move at a faster pace and a ultimatum letter was given to the family to produce a "number" by the end of January and thats what happened. Due diligence by the property owner is still on going and just needs some time. Its just a "number" and there is no ill intent or lack of civic pride here. Its just a business deal that has to take its course and the city wants to pay as little as they can and the family is trying to get the most they can.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks