Double trouble
http://www.okgazette.com/oklahoma/ar...e-trouble.html
Double trouble
http://www.okgazette.com/oklahoma/ar...e-trouble.html
Don't know about the legality. What I am mostly curious about is would they be entitled to anything more than the actual overcharge on the drinks they actually bought and consumed aka damages. They calculate a restaurant overcharged by hundreds of thousands of dollars. Since "they" did not spend that and it appears it is at best an estimation/calculation is the business responsible for paying anything more than what the actual receipt they have in evidence says? The input from OTC is not realy giving much direction on where this is going.
I am also curious why they filed in Canadian County...forum shopping???
I would have thought that you file in the county that has the most defendants in it? What if all the plaintiffs had been from Texas County in the panhandle?
A plaintiff generally files in the most convenient place, for the plaintiff, that the law will permit the filing to take place.
This is stupid. The people agreed to pay when they ordered and use (eat and drink) their orders. They will not win the lawsuit.
I hope you are correct.
The people assume they are being charged correctly and normally have no reason to doubt a business' ability to calculate tax properly. If anything, this will get awareness to the situation and get the tax commission involved in auditing businesses to make sure they are doing it correctly.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks