To sort of frame this discussion on topic, are we seriously concerned about a spike in parking needs for conventions? I would think only between 5% and 20% of the attendance number translates into parked cars. So it would take a fairly large convention to be super taxing on the structure, and by the time the convention center is completed, things will be markedly different downtown (or at least on the precipice of such things).
Maybe my earlier point several pages back was too esoteric. Back to the Convention Center specifically. It is probably the most significant publicly subsidized mechanism to bring visitors to our city.
I want them to have the best experience that any visitor can have in our fair city. My opinion is that The Underground is a bad idea for connecting to the CC unless it is for emergency weather conditions or for personelle/service folks. Visitors need a sidewalk level experience and experience true urban vibrancy.
Conversely, the Underground may already affect the level of pedestrian activity and that experience. And regarding visitors, every single minute is valuable. We will be paying dearly for those minutes. Lets make sure that their focus is used wisely.
I advocate for a weather protected, if not indoor, streetcar stop at the Convention Center. One with extra capacity. Streetcars are air conditioned and heated. They should suffice for meaningful connectivity to the Convention Center in lieu of catastrophic weather. Lets keep the Underground access to a minimum and encourage it's use responsibly.
You can't compare Okc to every city. But with western cities we have far less parking.
Having worked in the Denver CBD I drove in from boulder and depending on the weather parked between 4-6 blocks. Or 1 block. Because the cost was 10 a day 4-6 blocks or 25 for 1 block.
Just about everyone I worked with (that was not high up enough to have access to the company garage) did the same. What daily parking option do we have in the CBD. None This idea that in every city everyone is fine with walking blocks and blocks to work in bad weather simply is not true
We clearly need a combination of all of the above.
If companies are actively looking to leave downtown because of our parking situation, then we need more. Other companies looking to move downtown will find it easier if there are more parking garages and more spaces. So let's build them. Yes, it's the conventional answer, but a lot of companies are run by people who follow such conventional wisdom.
At the same time, commuter rail is absolutely the long-term answer. It may take 10+ years to get this moving, so garages will have to suffice in the interim. But is we expect the type of growth downtown that I hope we expect, then we can make good use of both. Building 3 or 4 more garages won't completely eliminate the need for rail. We'll fill those garages up, and still need more space. We will also be able to connect downtown to the airport, meaning that convention attendees and other visitors will be able to get downtown without needing to take up a parking space.
Finally we'll get lots more housing downtown. With the streetcar, that will enable people who are a 15 minute walk (living in Deep Deuce or Midtown) who are kinda lazy and would rather drive, to leave their car at home.
Yeah, I've only lived downtown since July, so it may just recently be getting better or something , but if I go for a walk in the CBD at lunch time or closing time, it seems like a good amount of foot traffic (conversely I've also gone for a walk in the Underground at both lunchtime and at closing time, and the traffic down there is very sparse). It's no New York, or Seattle, etc, but for us it seems okay (compared to what I heard about before I experienced it).
I worked and lived downtown for many years. I would usually drive. Why? Because I had to leave the office to attend meetings frequently throughout the day. Obviously, when the meeting was downtown, it was a bonus. If there were days I absolutely knew I wouldn't be leaving the office, I would walk.
I think your case is understandable (if I worked downtown, and had a dr appt or something, I'd probably drive that day), but I'm certain there are others that simply don't want to walk.
This is my experience as well. My situation is also that I may have to without notice race to the zoo, and several times a week make unplanned runs to places like hardware stores, Office Depot, etc.. It is a condition of running a small business and wearing every hat imaginable. I love walking to work but have only done it a few times because of these issues. I do ride a bike occasionally, and VERY often ride either a scooter or a motorcycle, since I can get anywhere in town - especially on the MC - or can quickly get home to grab my car.
Regarding the CC, while I agree that a streetcar stop is needed, once again I feel the need to point out that the streetcar is impractical (actually useless) for moving thousands at one time. It will be perfect for smaller meetings, and during major events will be helpful for moving a small percentage of attendees.
But we're talking what, 150-160 per train? That will only be enough capacity to piss off the thousands who won't fit on board when a large group exits at once, underscoring the need for the CC to be thoughtfully located in the best possible spot for walking to/from.
This is why there are services like TimeCar.
So now we have satisfied demand for another 20 of the 5000 exiting the building. Now what?
No, I am just saying that if people who can walk but choose to drive because they MIGHT have to go somewhere during the day - can just use TimeCar. Or here is a crazy idea - leave 15 minutes earlier and walk home and get your car. Not saying this works for everyone in ever occasion but somehow people around the world do it every day by the millions. An even crazier idea might be to find a local service provider for whatever it is people are leaving downtown for.
OKC is the geographic oddity of the known Universe - nothing that works anywhere else in the world can work there. No matter what the subject is, there is always something unique about OKC that just won't allow 10,000 years of human urban development to work there. The wheel must be reinvented in OKC every time.
Sorry, I thought you were suggesting it as a solution for convention attendees headed to lunch.
Yeah, I have considered TimeCar and Uber in my own circumstances. The reason not having a vehicle available is specifically tough when working in downtown OKC and leaving often is that virtually none of the things you are leaving the office for are available within walking distance. That IS a special circumstance here vs. more established urban environments.
For what it's worth, I walk all over downtown once I am at the office. I walk to the CVB for lunch, for meetings, for banking, for haircuts. I walk from Bricktown to and from Thunder games, and to and from home for Thunder games. I use Uber multiple times each week. I keep a bicycle in my office and sometimes ride that.
I'm in no way averse to walking; I'm averse to having an emergency and being 25 minutes away from my car in a city that demands that you get to 98% of its places by auto.
That'll change as time passes and we get more stuff downtown. I'm not saying it will ever go away completely, but it will decrease the average number of trips needed by the average downtown resident. I am sure there are people in Paris and NYC that drive to work everyday because they need access to their car at a moment's notice. It's just it isn't as high a percentage as downtown OKC workers. I'd say 95% of the people who work downtown drive every day. If we could reduce it to 80% we'd be doing great.
More housing equals more people. More people equals more services. A streetcar equals greater mobility without a car. We are getting all the pieces of the puzzle, one by one. But right now those pieces are scattered about, not connected with each other yet. Five years from now things will look a lot different.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks