Widgets Magazine
Page 97 of 99 FirstFirst ... 479293949596979899 LastLast
Results 2,401 to 2,425 of 2464

Thread: Chesapeake Business Practices

  1. Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Dustin View Post
    This isn't the thread for this, but does anyone know when the Christmas lights are supposed to come on? We drove by at sundown and they weren't on, but Whole Foods had theirs on...
    The lights on Western aren't done by CHK anymore, but rather was organized by a group called Winter on Western. There was a lighting ceremony Friday evening in honor of Aubrey. They were having some issues with the generators Friday, so I imagine they should be back on soon.

  2. #2402

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    "Industry observers are closely watching Callon Petroleum Co., SM Energy Co., Southwestern Energy Co. and Chesapeake Energy Corp. as possible takeover targets, given their overlapping acreage and need to scale up. "

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...?sref=VEjJXJjm

  3. #2403

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Chk being the one acquiring would only benefit OKC.
    https://www.reuters.com/markets/deal...es-2023-10-17/

  4. #2404

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    I read that as CHK is wanting to acquire companies. Whether it be SW or some other company.

  5. #2405

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by chssooner View Post
    I read that as CHK is wanting to acquire companies. Whether it be SW or some other company.
    They are still downsizing.

    Down to 688 OKC employees and dropping.

    They were once over 5,000.

  6. #2406

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    They are still downsizing.

    Down to 688 OKC employees and dropping.

    They were once over 5,000.
    Not sure if that’s commentary their ability/potential plans to make an acquisition or just commentary on the current state of the company locally but downsizing staff doesn’t necessarily indicate that they aren’t looking to acquire another company. CHK is in about as good of financial position as it’s been in since 2008 and are extremely bullish longterm on natural gas (especially in the NE and with good reason). Southwestern’s Appalachia and Haynesville assets seem to complement CHK’s pretty well. If it comes to pass, they would likely reclaim the title of largest gas producer in the US from EQT (at least in market cap, not sure of how much the three companies are producing right now). Hope it happens, would be a great deal for OKC, if anything in that it ensures CHK won’t be going anywhere for a while.

  7. #2407

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    Not sure if that’s commentary their ability/potential plans to make an acquisition or just commentary on the current state of the company locally but downsizing staff doesn’t necessarily indicate that they aren’t looking to acquire another company. CHK is in about as good of financial position as it’s been in since 2008 and are extremely bullish longterm on natural gas (especially in the NE and with good reason). Southwestern’s Appalachia and Haynesville assets seem to complement CHK’s pretty well. If it comes to pass, they would likely reclaim the title of largest gas producer in the US from EQT (at least in market cap, not sure of how much the three companies are producing right now). Hope it happens, would be a great deal for OKC.
    I know someone who works there and talked to him today; that employee total continues to go down month by month, year by year.

    Two people from his department were fired today and they are expecting more later in the year. They have moved out of all the buildings east of Classen.

    Not the actions of a company expecting growth.

  8. #2408

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    I know someone who works there and talked to him today; that employee total continues to go down month by month, year by year.

    Two people from his department were fired today and they are expecting more later in the year. They have moved out of all the buildings east of Classen.

    Not the actions of a company expecting growth.
    I know several people there in the land department. Though I haven’t asked them directly about SWN, they have been actively evaluating acquisition targets. All the news stories today didn’t appear for no reason.

    They could just as easily be acquired but you don’t need to staff up to make an acquisition like that (just look at Devon who was also shrinking and laying people off then essentially acquired WPX). Most of the heavy M&A lifting is done by outside consultanting firms and contractors (I’ve been involved in a ton of these on the consultant side for tiny companies, headcount wise, buying out larger ones). If they’re planning to acquire SWN, which is a fairly good size company, they will have a bunch of overlapping employees that work the same assets as well as administrative employees that they would most likely absorb in that type of deal. Could very easily be reducing staff that they don’t need in their current state and assume that if a large scale acquisition like that goes through, they’ll have their pick of employees from the other company who, as a bonus, are familiar with that company’s history with its asset base. They also may have been letting any remaining personnel related to their Eagleford assets go since they finalized their exit from that play back in August after multiple sales this year.

    This could easily go either way but given that they just banked $3.5 billion in cash from their Eagleford exit this year (which is about half the market cap of SWN), I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see them make a big splash. I guarantee any debt that remained after the bankruptcy in 2020/2021 was refinanced at near 0 interest rates so that debt is cheap and not really a liability anymore (ie they wouldn’t be in a huge hurry to pay it down with the asset sale proceeds). Their plan since last year has been to reduce their oil production in favor of more natural gas, so selling out of the Eagleford and purchasing a large complementary gas producer like SWN would fit that plan.

    I’ll ask around my circles and see what I can find out.

  9. #2409

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    I didn't mean to imply they aren't making money or doing well, just that they continue to shrink in terms of employees which is what really matters in terms of impact on OKC.

  10. #2410

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    I didn't mean to imply they aren't making money or doing well, just that they continue to shrink in terms of employees which is what really matters in terms of impact on OKC.
    Gotcha. Well SWN is a fairly large company (similar in size to Continental) and has around 1000 employees so hopefully that would result in at least a few hundred moving here from Houston if it comes to pass.

  11. #2411

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices


  12. #2412

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Huge for CHK. King of gas once again. Would have the biggest market cap for a gas producer.

  13. #2413

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    WSJ reporting deal should be done next week. https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-...d7372d?mod=mhp

  14. #2414

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Will the combined headquarters be in OKC?

  15. #2415

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Yahoo Finance link not behind a pay wall.
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/south...t_AuSDPrfDilSR

  16. #2416

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by stlokc View Post
    Will the combined headquarters be in OKC?
    Most likely yes.

  17. #2417

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    Most likely yes.
    If so, it would be huge for OKC. Shows CHK is back, and hopefully that OKC companies are in purchase mode, not sell mode.

  18. #2418

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    It would be nice if OKC can land this merger and new jobs be added to the OKC HQ's. The only thing is the energy sector is/can be volatile and can change at the drop of the hat. That pesky boom and bust mentality. What if Chesapeake gets bought out in the future, and moves HQ to Houston? Right new, HQ for SWE are located in the Houston area which is really the true oil capital.

  19. Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by progressiveboy View Post
    It would be nice if OKC can land this merger and new jobs be added to the OKC HQ's. The only thing is the energy sector is/can be volatile and can change at the drop of the hat. That pesky boom and bust mentality. What if Chesapeake gets bought out in the future, and moves HQ to Houston? Right new, HQ for SWE are located in the Houston area which is really the true oil capital.
    They always could, but most of the peeps in Houston are focused on oil weighted prospects. Natural Gas is not exactly a sexy proposition at these pricing levels.

  20. #2420

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by April in the Plaza View Post
    They always could, but most of the peeps in Houston are focused on oil weighted prospects. Natural Gas is not exactly a sexy proposition at these pricing levels.
    Russian production is eventually going to implode due to incompetence and lack of expertise. The United States has some of the lowest cost on production in the space currently. I think domestic players are going to be exporting record amounts in the near future. It takes a little bit of conflict in a couple places to drive things crazy and we can definitely feel some rumblings. It can be easy to be down on domestic energy production given current pricing levels, if you take a step back it feels a lot better when you consider the state of the rest of the world.

  21. #2421

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by progressiveboy View Post
    It would be nice if OKC can land this merger and new jobs be added to the OKC HQ's. The only thing is the energy sector is/can be volatile and can change at the drop of the hat. That pesky boom and bust mentality. What if Chesapeake gets bought out in the future, and moves HQ to Houston? Right new, HQ for SWE are located in the Houston area which is really the true oil capital.
    What kind of losers mentality is this? Yes….in a city that needs all the good jobs it can get…Let’s be disappointed or concerned about the potential of gaining somewhere between 100-1,000 well paying jobs, or at the very least bolstering the jobs already here, because there’s a chance some of them may go away at some point. These companies are both running extremely lean at this point. CHK will need ant least some additional staff to absorb SWN’s assets whether that be from SWN or additional hires.

    Also the only reason I didn’t unequivocally state that the HQ would be here is that none of the articles have even referenced it to this point but there is little to no reason to believe it will not be. This has been treated as a takeover in which CHK will be the surviving entity from everything I’ve seen/heard and they have a massive campus with ample office space here as opposed to one or two buildings in a mixed use development in Spring, TX.

  22. #2422

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by citywokchinesefood View Post
    Russian production is eventually going to implode due to incompetence and lack of expertise. The United States has some of the lowest cost on production in the space currently. I think domestic players are going to be exporting record amounts in the near future. It takes a little bit of conflict in a couple places to drive things crazy and we can definitely feel some rumblings. It can be easy to be down on domestic energy production given current pricing levels, if you take a step back it feels a lot better when you consider the state of the rest of the world.
    One only needs to look to the massive effect that the Ukraine conflict had on oil and natural gas prices for the entirety of 2022 and nearly half of 2023. Starting in mid-2021 Market dynamics were pointing toward a price increase as a rebound from everything that happened during the pandemic and all it took was a conflcit between a major oil producer and another to blow prices through the roof. Between everything going on in Russia, Venezuela, Guyana, Iran, Israel, etc… it’s a powder keg.

  23. #2423

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Any geopolitical concerns are being offset by weak demand and rising OPEC (and non-OPEC somewhat) production... Saudi just cut their price to Asia to lowest it's been in 2.5 years.

  24. #2424
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,681
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    One only needs to look to the massive effect that the Ukraine conflict had on oil and natural gas prices for the entirety of 2022 and nearly half of 2023. Starting in mid-2021 Market dynamics were pointing toward a price increase as a rebound from everything that happened during the pandemic and all it took was a conflcit between a major oil producer and another to blow prices through the roof. Between everything going on in Russia, Venezuela, Guyana, Iran, Israel, etc… it’s a powder keg.
    And yet the Ukrainian war rages and gas is cheaper than a year ago. The market roils short term and adjusts long term.

  25. #2425

    Default Re: Chesapeake Business Practices

    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    And yet the Ukrainian war rages and gas is cheaper than a year ago. The market roils short term and adjusts long term.

    Correct. Just saying that another large scale international incident can tip the scales causing a price shock that can last a year or longer and likely will if some of the brewing geopolitical issues I mentioned pop off in any significant way, just as the Ukrainian war/conflict did.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Aubrey McClendon increases ownership in KSBI
    By Nermel in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-17-2009, 05:13 PM
  2. McClendon speaks out against OG&E's proposed plant
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 07:36 AM
  3. McClendon & Ward invest in KSBI TV
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-07-2007, 12:32 AM
  4. new to the board....
    By BricktownGuy in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 01-10-2005, 10:13 PM
  5. New to board and looking.
    By dirtrider73068 in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-05-2004, 09:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO