Widgets Magazine
Page 4 of 144 FirstFirst 12345678954104 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 3701

Thread: Scissortail Park

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Central Park

    So since they have already cleared some ground, its just a matter of time now until the other land is bought and demolished right?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Central Park

    And wasn't the covention center going where this "sub-station" is?. And the Ford site was going to be mixed use...but i love that location!

  3. #3

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by skanaly View Post
    And wasn't the covention center going where this "sub-station" is?. And the Ford site was going to be mixed use...but i love that location!
    Awhile back, yeah that was the "plan".

  4. #4

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by MDot View Post
    Awhile back, yeah that was the "plan".
    Does anyone know what happened to that plan? It seems to me that would be a far greater site (without sub-station relcation cost).

  5. #5

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by skanaly View Post
    And wasn't the covention center going where this "sub-station" is?. And the Ford site was going to be mixed use...but i love that location!
    It was the plan until they started floating a 30 million dollar cost around to relocate the sub station.......

  6. #6

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by Bellaboo View Post
    It was the plan until they started floating a 30 million dollar cost around to relocate the sub station.......
    It will probably take at least that much to purchase the old Ford site.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by mcca7596 View Post
    It will probably take at least that much to purchase the old Ford site.
    or maybe double that much

  8. #8

    Default Re: Central Park

    Who owns the land in which the sub-station is currently located on? Private or State?

  9. #9

    Default Re: Central Park

    OG+E, so...whichever category you think that fits under

  10. #10

    Default Re: Central Park

    I was crediting the committee for the way they have phased the park; first starting with a basic plan then adding programming later, after the surrounding area has begun to take shape, we see how things play out at the Myriad Gardens, etc.

    The park committee can't do anything about where the convention center is located.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Central Park

    Somehow I keep hearing the Dixie Chicks singing Wide Open Spaces and that line about Room to make her big mistakes.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Central Park

    It would be so much more better to have the CC where this "sub-station" is because that would leave lots of room for mixed use stuff on the ford site. If there were shopping areas, cafes, and offices with restaurants and stuff, that would be very "pedestrian friendly." Didn't the mayor/the city want the boulevard to be a place that everyone would want to go if they went downtown...It would also connect the myriad gardens to central park. Witch would make central park so much easier to get to from somewhere like the gardens, or the chesapeeke arena, or any other place. Having a Big convention center blocking that flow would leave the boulevard with taxis and buses, rather having tourists and peds.

    If the CC went where i think it should be, then it would also bring lots more life closer to the shore...making the existing ground easier do stuff on

  13. #13

    Default Re: Central Park

    ^^^opinions have already been hashed on this one in the Convention Center thread. We feel your pain.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Central Park

    But it's also about the park...like i said...the park would be separated in a way from the core of downtown

  15. #15

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by skanaly View Post
    But it's also about the park...like i said...the park would be separated in a way from the core of downtown
    He's saying we've already discussed this and everybody shares your opinion.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by MDot View Post
    He's saying we've already discussed this and everybody shares your opinion.
    Thank you Mdot.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,692
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by skanaly View Post
    But it's also about the park...like i said...the park would be separated in a way from the core of downtown
    THe two will be separated...regardless. Either by private development or by the cc.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    THe two will be separated...regardless. Either by private development or by the cc.
    I think most all of us understand the inevitability of that. It doesn't mean that we all have to concede that it's the ultimate right thing to do.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Central Park

    I tend to look at it this way. Just because some OKC folk are over the city's long held inferiority complex doesn't mean their city father's are over it yet.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Central Park

    There will be a westbound off-ramp onto Robinson, but that's it.

  21. #21

    Default Re: Central Park

    Quote Originally Posted by mcca7596 View Post
    There will be a westbound off-ramp onto Robinson, but that's it.
    And there is no exit to Shields from westbound I-40.

  22. #22

    Default Re: Central Park

    The Park Subcommittee did not meet this month. They did not make quorum. Some people were sick and the time had been bumped.

  23. #23

    Default Re: Central Park

    I am going to put this on the park thread too. There is a TON of relevant information in this recording about what is being thought about the park and how C2S, the CC, and the Blvd to it.

    http://soundcloud.com/moderntransitp...maps-3-transit

  24. Default Re: Central Park

    Thanks for posting this Jeff!

  25. #25

    Default Re: Central Park

    No problem. It turned out so well that we intend to make it part of our standard practice to record these meetings. If we had a videographer willing to donate their time, we would make use of that as well.

    I personally take great pride in the level of transparency that the streetcar/hub aspect of MAPS has had. I think that it contributes to people's support of our project.

    Also, this particular meeting seemed as though it would hold a great deal of content that should be documented. We have an archival audio recording of a meeting regarding P180 issues/streetcar that could be put up too if people want it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Map of Potential Infill Sites in Central OKC
    By shane453 in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 01-22-2012, 10:14 PM
  2. The Lincoln at Central Park / Gardner Tanenbaum project
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-16-2011, 10:58 AM
  3. First MAPS 3 Project (70 Acre Central Park)?
    By G.Walker in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-17-2011, 09:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO