That video is exactly why the only way you could categorize Oklahoma regionally is "Texoma", though I think it really is just Oklahoma all by its lonesome.
That video is exactly why the only way you could categorize Oklahoma regionally is "Texoma", though I think it really is just Oklahoma all by its lonesome.
Good video.
It covered the various changes of both states and set the stage of trends throughout the last 3 centuries.
The end of the video predicts more influx into Oklahoma especially Tulsa where we see those changes on the horizon. Oklahoma City will continue to focus on quality of life and will continue to lead the influx of raw growth; whereas Tulsa will have the higher growth rate.
God Bless Oklahoma.
Thanks Plutonic Panda.
OKC supposedly the 5th dirtiest US city:
https://www.lawnstarter.com/blog/stu...ates/#rankings
Really? SF, Seattle, KC, and a lot of other cities are extremely dirty but then again I like a gritty city like SF and Seattle or at least I did when I was in my 20's and early 20's.
My nephew from Palmdale/Lancaster CA always says something about how clean it is here when he visits but antelope valley in CA is like another planet.
This seems like it has some poorly thought out ways to evaluate being dirty. Consumer Satisfaction seems questionable how well it ties to dirtiness. Green house gases per capita tends to have in inverses relationship to how concentrated air pollution is in a city, as it tends to be higher in the lowest density cities, so air pollution sources are much more spread out. It is interesting how many top 10 Living Condition Rank cities ended up in their top 10 dirtiest cities. Infrastructure rank also seems like it can have low correlation to what I would consider a dirty city as well.
Why is a lawn care website putting out a "dirtiest cities" listicle?
I've looked them up before. I wouldn't put much importance in it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks