I’m in Las Vegas all the time and I disagree. Vegas does much better in insuring protected ped access
I’m in Las Vegas all the time and I disagree. Vegas does much better in insuring protected ped access
I think only option now is to try to get a news station to do a story and get bad publicity on the coty as that is usually the only way they listen these days
You'd think they were dropping anvils on peoples' heads as they walked by. It's not that serious.
FNC construction is taking the whole southbound side Broadway. Plus, either way, its nowhere near ADA compliant.
The solution is simple really, if they wanted to spend the money,anyway. Build a covered walkway. There spending millions of dollars on a remodel, they can build a covered walkway.
There is no way to get to the Sheraton from the Skirvin without walking in the car lane.
Vegas is NOT a great pedestrian city. Neither is Dallas. Not really sure the point of pointing out other cities that are terrible for pedestrians. If it’s bad it’s bad.
Yet Vegas boulevard has more pedestrian traffic per hour than lots of cities see in a year. lol okay
I feel that median along Broadway will probably be turn up eventually for a turn lane into fnc garage so why not turn it is to a temporary sideway right now?
My reference to Las Vegas regards only pedestrian protection during construction on Las Vegas Blvd. And I have had many harrowing experiences on narrow and uneven diverters during construction at Palazzo, Linq, Harmon Corner, City Center, etc. Permanent pedestrian access is another story.
Only reason I mentioned it is because posters opined that OKC is the worst at construction pedestrian protection.
I've heard Eric Wenger give this lecture as well. He says that in OKC the property line goes to the middle of the street. Not testifying to the veracity, just saying I have witnessed him say this on at least three occasions.
Yeah, well try building anything on a sidewalk or into the street and see how that works out.
And if you look at the county assessor site, you can see this is 100% not true. Lines are clearly drawn.
And for example, all the P180 work was done on city property (sidewalks, streets) and with city money.
But the city expects you to mow their ROW on your own dime...
Oklahoma counties assessor is very good IMO, but can be inaccurate when it comes to the property lines on the map. Surveys provide the most accurate lot line locations which shouldn't surprise anyone. I will say though I have never experienced people owning to the middle of the road. Usually it is just to the curb cut where there is ROW as well as zoning setbacks that cannot be built on.
ie when the city vacates an alley easement or vacates a street the ajoining property owners don't "buy" that land back from the city
when REHCO wanted the city to close the streets going through their property next to the peake they would not have had to buy that land from the city
Yes, some sidewalks are fine with high pedestrian counts. There are so many broken pedestrian areas, which are far more dangerous than most cities because of their highways for streets. Two things can be happening at once. Vegas is NOT a good example of how to design a city IMHO.
Just out of curiosity are there any specific parts of the city you noticed this in? In and around Summerlin I’ve noticed there aren’t too many accommodations for pedestrians.
Fair points but I don’t think every city should be accompanying pedestrians over cars and Las Vegas is one of those cities. I love the wide roads and freeways. I wish OKC would be akin to Vegas than Portland.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks