Are you for real? Communicate with the city council members? Do you actually not think that city council members don't know what public trusts are and what they can do? Do you think their memory is so short that they forgot that they passed a ballot measure just a couple years ago concerning a hotel tax to be used for specific improvements at the fairgrounds?
This language is deliberate. The design is absolutely deliberate. Nothing gets onto these ballot measures by mistake. According to you, we have perfectly honest council members who just happen to be absolute morons who can't even recall how they accomplished similar (smaller) tasks in recent history. That's absurd. These are smart enough people and the folks putting this program together are highly competent. Everything about this is by design. The language is no mistake. They want flexibility to be able to win the money by selling us one thing and then be free to do something else, otherwise, through very simple mechanisms, they could have tied themselves down.
As I have said, the constitutionality of the MAPS I ballot was probably a more substantial certainty than the constitutionality of the present ballot. The more I consider this, the more I see that this is designed as a project for city council members to get their paws on their own personal bailout funds.
-- or yeah... I could go speak at the citizens' comment microphone and be ignored just like every single person who has ever spoken there has been in the past. That's a great suggestion.
Bookmarks