Widgets Magazine
Results 1 to 25 of 185

Thread: Oklahoma’s request for Real ID Act extension denied

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Oklahoma’s request for Real ID Act extension denied

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    The cost of having to upgrade the IT infrastructure is the main reason Oklahoma hasn't adopted Real ID.
    That simply isn't true. Real ID was being discussed when Oklahoma installed the first digital driver's license system over a decade ago, a system which has been upgraded at least once since. There were news reports at that time that changes were coming to DL requirements, and Oklahoma specifically made the choice to ignore it. Twice. Once after it was no longer in the discussion phase, but actual law on the books phase. We can debate privacy issues, we can debate identity protection issues, we can debate whatever we want until the cows come home, but what is not up for debate is the fact that Oklahoma has had more than enough time and opportunity to become compliant, and the reason it is going to be a huge cost now is because Oklahoma has refused to do it until it is simply too late.

    Is it a bad law? Maybe. Does ignoring bad laws make them go away? Absolutely not. Oklahoma should have learned that better than anyone else. The main reason Oklahoma hasn't adopted Real ID is absolutely not the cost of upgrading the infrastructure if Oklahoma has already spent those costs TWICE. Add to that the infrastructure is already there. Your photo, your fingerprints, your other information, all already stored.

  2. Default Re: Oklahoma’s request for Real ID Act extension denied

    Quote Originally Posted by stile99 View Post
    That simply isn't true. Real ID was being discussed when Oklahoma installed the first digital driver's license system over a decade ago, a system which has been upgraded at least once since. There were news reports at that time that changes were coming to DL requirements, and Oklahoma specifically made the choice to ignore it. Twice. Once after it was no longer in the discussion phase, but actual law on the books phase. We can debate privacy issues, we can debate identity protection issues, we can debate whatever we want until the cows come home, but what is not up for debate is the fact that Oklahoma has had more than enough time and opportunity to become compliant, and the reason it is going to be a huge cost now is because Oklahoma has refused to do it until it is simply too late.

    Is it a bad law? Maybe. Does ignoring bad laws make them go away? Absolutely not. Oklahoma should have learned that better than anyone else. The main reason Oklahoma hasn't adopted Real ID is absolutely not the cost of upgrading the infrastructure if Oklahoma has already spent those costs TWICE. Add to that the infrastructure is already there. Your photo, your fingerprints, your other information, all already stored.
    In total agreement here.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Request for Information/Understanding, Real Estate
    By RadicalModerate in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-20-2014, 09:35 PM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-25-2012, 08:31 AM
  3. Oklahoma students fall behind in math, science ACT scores
    By Roadhawg in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 08-24-2012, 09:39 PM
  4. EPA cites 2 violations of Clean Water Act on Oklahoma River
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-22-2009, 01:08 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO