View Full Version : In God We Trust In Certain Da,s I Wouldn't



FOR GIVING HUSBAND
08-09-2006, 03:39 PM
IN FIGHTING THE ISSUE OF JUSTICE FOR ALL NOT JUST SOME
I'VE NOTICED

IT SEEMS THAT IN SOME PARTS OF THE SYSTEM OF JUSTICE IN THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA ONLY CHOOSE TO

RECOGNIZE THE RULES LAWS AND GUIDES MEANT FOR ALL TO FOLLOW AS THE LAW OF THE LAND REGARDLESS OF COLOR CREED OR MONEY STATUS WHICH THEY DEEM IMPORTANT TO MEET THEIR MISSION OR AGENDA

THEY CHOOSE TO FOLLOW AND APPLY THESE RULES LAWS AND GUIDE LINES ONLY TO WHERE THEY SEE FIT TO JUST SOME OF THE PEOPLE NOT ALL

IT IS ALL RIGHT TO ASK OTHERS TO GO FIGHT FOR THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF OTHERS IN DISTANT COUNTRY'S

WHEN IN OUR OWN COUNTRY

THE RIGHTS OF ONE THEIR OWN MEMBERS RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED

AND LAWS ARE ALLOW TO BE BENT OR REDESIGNED TO GET A CONVICTION

AND PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN PUT IN POSITION TO PROTECT AND SERVE THE RIGHTS OF ALL THE PEOPLE

ARE ALLOW TO HIDE BEHIND THEIR POSITION MASKING THEIR OWN AGENDA

THEY SAY THIS MASK IS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THEM SELVES IN APPLYING THE LAW. IF THE LAW RULES AND GUIDES ARE APPLY TO EVERY ONE THEY HAVE NO NEED TO FEAR A COURT OF LAW

IN POINT THE SAME PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS THAT THEY HAVE BEEN CHOSEN TO SERVE ALSO PROTECTS THEM . THE TERM NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW I THINK APPLIES HERE

AND A HUSBAND WHO HAS 100% PROOF THAT HIS WIFE IS NOT GUILTY OF ANY THING HAS NO STANDING TO DEFEND HIS WIFE IN A COURT OF LAW

ONE WHO HE HIM SELF IS A RETIRED GULF WAR VET WHO HAS ALSO SERVED HIS COUNTRY TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF OTHERS

WHAT BASIS OF LAW GIVES THE RIGHT OF A JUDGE TO SEPARATE A MAN AND WIFE IN A COURT OF LAW AS PART OF A PROBATION FOR SOME THING THAT MIGHT HAPPEN FOR SOME THING HE HAS 100% PROOF SHE WAS NOT GUILTY IN THE FIRST PLACE

GOING AGAINST THEIR VOWS

IF ANY ONE HAS ANY REASON THAT THESE TWO SO NOT BE JOINED ,LET THEM SPEAK NOW OR FOR EVER HOLD THEIR PEACE ,LET NO MAN PUT A CINDER ,TILL DEATH DO THEY PART
I DON'T RE CALL THE JUDGE OR THE DA BEING AT OUR WEDDING AND VOICING ANY PROBLEM

THERE ARE THOSE IN THE OKLAHOMA JUSTICE SYSTEM THAT HAVE USED THERE FAITH AS A BASIS FOR THEIR GUIDE IN A COURT OF LAW, BEING PUT THERE BY GOD TO ACT AS MINISTER OF JUSTICE. IF THIS IS THE CASE

WHICH RULE OF LAW IS HIGHER IN A COURT OF LAW MAN'S LAW OR GODS

IF GODS LAW IS GOING TO BE DISREGARDED THAN THE ISSUE OF WHY WE SAY VOWS WHY GET MARRIED

AND THE DAY A HUSBAND HAS NO STANDING TO PROTECT AND DEFEND HIS WIFE IN A COURT OF LAW THAN THAT BRINGS UP THE POINT HOW ANY ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO FIGHT FOR THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF ANY ONE

NOT TO MENTION THE POINT THAT IT DOES NOT MATTER IN A COURT OF LAW THAT SHE'S NOT GUILTY ONLY THAT SHE WAS NOT ABLY TO FOLLOW THE GUIDE LINES THAT THEY DECIDE TO APPLY

THE PHRASE ONE LAW UNDER GOD BRINGS UP TWO POINTS

A. ONE THAT THE SYSTEM OF JUSTICE'S RULES LAWS AND GUIDES LINES APPLY TO ALL.

B. THAT GODS LAW IS ABOVE MEN'S LAW AND IS THE FOUNDING PRINCIPAL FOR OUR SYSTEM OF JUSTICE IN WHICH THE MARRIAGE OF TWO PEOPLE IS THE ROOT OF WHICH ALL LAWS ARE TO BE APPLY AND FORMED

1.THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH TO BE ALLOW TO BE HEARD IN A COURT OF LAW

2. THE RIGHT TO FACE ONE'S ACCUSER .IN THIS CASE

WHO WAS IT . IT WAS NOT ME

3. THE RIGHT TO BE ABLY TO CALL WITTINESS'S TO HELP PROVE AND DEFEND HER ON ANY CHARGE

IN THIS CASE I WAS THE ONLY ONE THERE THAT COULD EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENED. BUT YET I WAS NOT INFORMED TO BE ABLY TO BE THERE

4. THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, THE BASIS BEING THE RIGHT TO PROTECT OUR HOMES AND FAMILY THAT WOULD INCLUDE OUR WIFE

5.THE RIGHT TO HAVE THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED AND REVIEWED TO WHAT THEY BEING CHARGED WITH NOT JUST TAKEN AT FACE VALUE

6 THE RIGHT TO HAVE ALL THE RULES LAWS AND GUIDES APPLY TO EVERY ONE NOT JUST TO SOME

7 THE RIGHT TO HAVE PROPER LAW APPLIED TO HER CASE NOT CORPORATE LAW ANSWERING IN A CIVIL MATER

8 THE RIGHT TO BE INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND

9. THE RIGHT TO EXPECT THAT THE ONES REPRESENTING OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM INVESTIGATORS AND LAWYERS TO BE EXPECTED TO INFORM THE SYSTEM OF ANY NEW EVIDENCE IN A CASE AGAINST THE PERSON.

IN THIS CASE BOTH THE INVESTIGATOR AND HER LAWYER WERE TOLD IN TIME FOR HER TO CHANGE HER PLEA WITH IN THE TIME LIMIT BUT WAS NOT INFORMED

10 TO EXPECT TO BE TOLD THE TRUTH IN ANY CASE OF INFORMATION

IN THIS CASE NOT BEING ALLOW TO GET THE REAL FACTS ABOUT ME THAT I WAS NOT DEAD OR A VEG. IN A CHAIR ONLY THAT I WOULD NOT BE ABLY TO HELP DEFEND HER

11. THE RIGHT TO A REVIEW WHERE EVERY ONE IS INFORMED OF THEIR PROBATION HEARING

IN THIS CASE I WAS NOT INFORMED SO I COULD BE THERE AND DEFEND A WRONG

WHY IF THIS IS NOT TRUE THAN ON EVERY LEGAL TENDER WE HAVE IN OUR COUNTRY APPEARS THE WORDS IN GOD WE TRUST
_________________
THIS IS WHAT THEY WOULD LEAD YOU TO BELIEVE :fighting3

bandnerd
08-09-2006, 03:40 PM
Oh my god, we get it! You don't like Wes Lane! Quit spamming up the boards or just put it all into one thread!

FOR GIVING HUSBAND
08-09-2006, 04:29 PM
Just To Let You No Ive Been Trying To Post On This Forum For 3-4 Months And Nothing Happen I Just Tried To Post The Poll And The Rest Came Up I Did Not Post Them All At One Time That Would Be Rude. Iam Sorry It Happened Really