View Full Version : Presby Research Park looking to double w/ help of TIF



Pete
04-27-2006, 08:03 AM
Tax increment finance district could double research park

By Steve Lackmeyer
The Oklahoman

The Presbyterian Health Foundation Research Park could double in size during the next decade if a tax increment finance district proposed for the Oklahoma Health Center wins approval.

The Oklahoma City Redevelopment Authority on Wednesday recommended creation of the district, but the proposal still needs approval by a committee comprised of representatives of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma City Public Schools, MetroTech and the Metropolitan Library System.

If the district is created, and an amendment is made to the existing health center district, an additional $28 million could be raised toward construction of parking and other improvements for expansion of the research park, the Dean A. McGee Eye Institute and Children's Hospital.

"We want fairly intensive development, which is why we're wanting new parking facilities, so we can make better use of the land," said Dan Batchelor, attorney for the Oklahoma City Redevelopment Authority.

The Presbyterian Health Foundation has built six buildings the past decade, while a garage was financed by the tax increment finance district.

Construction is set to begin this summer on a second garage and a seventh building.

The research park has added 24 tenants in just the past year, and a biopharmaceutical plant is set to start operations later this year. With current space at capacity, the foundation is looking beyond its existing master plan of 10 buildings, Batchelor said.

Economist Larkin Warner, who wrote a recent central city economic impact study for the Greater Oklahoma City Chamber, said the expansion is overdue.

His research showed the park has created about 1,000 new bioscience jobs with an estimated average salary of $60,000.

"What's happened in the entire health center rivals the economic impact of MAPS," Warner said, referring to the $370 million downtown improvements package that included the Bricktown Canal, AT&T Bricktown Ballpark and the Ford Center.

Warner thinks the Presbyterian Health Foundation, which financed construction of the research park, may have underestimated the success of its efforts.

"The truth is, when you spend as much as these guys did, $70 million, you get big results," Warner said. "And as long they're able to keep going, it's a good idea."

Warner said the Oklahoma Health Center, along with the research park, have been overshadowed in public perception by the success in nearby Bricktown.

"What's really driving central city development is the health economy," Warner said. "And we ain't seen nothing yet. When these baby boomers start to retire, and start failing, the demands on the health sector are going to skyrocket."

The expansion won't be quick. Batchelor estimated the new master plan will take about 10 to 12 years to complete. He estimated the Urban Renewal Authority and Presbyterian Health Foundation control about 50 percent of property in the proposed expansion area between NE 4 and NE 8, Stonewall Avenue and Lincoln Boulevard.

The area includes the Bradford Commons apartments, a public housing complex that closed a couple years ago. The foundation owns the land but not the buildings.

A master plan is under way to determine the best sites for additional research park buildings. Batchelor estimated the total office and lab space will grow from a current maximum of about 1 million square feet with all 10 buildings to more than 2.5 million square feet with the proposed expansion.

The plan could involve Urban Renewal acquisition of properties in the area south of NE 8. Urban Renewal Director JoeVan Bullard said the city declared it an acquisition area more than 20 years ago, allowing the agency to use eminent domain, if necessary.

"This area has long been in the Harrison-Walnut Urban Renewal area," Batchelor said. "Now that we're moving the research park south, and there is more institutional development around the health center, it just makes more sense to do this now."

floater
04-27-2006, 08:39 AM
"What's happened in the entire health center rivals the economic impact of MAPS," Warner said, referring to the $370 million downtown improvements package that included the Bricktown Canal, AT&T Bricktown Ballpark and the Ford Center.


I believe it.

Midtowner
04-27-2006, 09:11 AM
With TIF? WHY!?!

This is something that will be massively profitable. It doesn't need public money. A private financier would be an idiot to turn this project down. If its application is approved, I'll be disgusted.

If it is approved, it'll just confirm what we already know -- developers consider themselves 'owed' money out of the system at the expense of our schools (who are the primary beneficiaries of property taxes which these guys are essentialy dodging). But I guess making rich developers a few hundred thousand dollars richer is more important than being able to provide our schools with luxuries like air conditioning and heating..

Pete
04-27-2006, 09:21 AM
Seems like TIF's are all the rage now around town and developers are demanding them before they'll move forward.

Basically, they are just re-directing tax dollars generated by the new development back into their project.

A little of this seems like a good idea -- was very helpful in getting the Skirvin remodeled -- but I'm concerned that developers are now holding the city hostage for these things and that we continue to set a bad precedent.

Won't everyone now be demanding them and thus choke off a fair amount of future tax dollars that are sorely needed?

Midtowner
04-27-2006, 10:07 AM
The TIF legislation needs to be amended setting forth specific requirements that must be met for TIF to kick in. It should be used to encourage growth where no growth would otherwise occur. Otherwise, I agree, developers are holding the city hostage, and our schools will pay the price.

Patrick
04-27-2006, 10:21 AM
Using TIF money for the Skirvin made sense. It wouldn't have been profitable to renovate the Skirvin otherwise. The price tag was simply too high.

This is what TIF money is designed to be used for.

But to build a shopping mall in Edmond and expand a very profitable research park? I have problems with that.

With the success the Presby Foundation has had, why not consider going to a bank to get money for this project, instead of taking from our schools.

Pete
04-27-2006, 10:45 AM
Also keep in mind, that in the case of shopping centers and hotels (and perhaps even research parks) they are gaining a competitive advantage through public assistance.

This issue is being raised with the University North Park development in Norman by other existing businesses and property owners, and it's a very fair point.


The Skirvin was a perfect TIF use, in that it will merely reinvest future tax dollars back into the property -- taxes that would have never been possible without public assistance in the first place. Also, there is still room for the existing hotels downtown and if anything the Skirvin will help them all, by adding to the room inventory and thus inching closer to critical mass that will help land conventions.


Considering the fact we are still yet to see a big developer come to town with a major proposal, you can just bet when that does happen they will have their hand out.

And given the precedent we've set (and without clear guidelines as Midtowner mentioned) how will we say no?