View Full Version : Murrah Builiding Bombing Investigation Not Over?



ljbab728
07-27-2014, 11:26 PM
Federal judge to decide if FBI must search further for surveillance video of Oklahoma City bombing | News OK (http://newsok.com/federal-judge-to-decide-if-fbi-must-search-further-for-surveillance-video-of-oklahoma-city-bombing/article/5086417)

In spite of his motives, this man just needs to give it up. Nothing new will come out.


A federal judge in Utah is set to begin hearing testimony Monday to determine if the FBI must search again for something it says doesn’t exist — a surveillance videotape showing the Oklahoma City bombing.

zookeeper
07-27-2014, 11:54 PM
Federal judge to decide if FBI must search further for surveillance video of Oklahoma City bombing | News OK (http://newsok.com/federal-judge-to-decide-if-fbi-must-search-further-for-surveillance-video-of-oklahoma-city-bombing/article/5086417)

In spite of his motives, this man just needs to give it up. Nothing new will come out.

Speaking of taking threads to politics. If you don't think conspiracy talk about the OKC bombing and your giving an opinion to said conspiracy isn't politics, you are mistaken. It's just odd after you told me to take my post about Ukraine to 'Politics.'
I think they both should be there.

dmoor82
07-28-2014, 12:41 AM
*Murrah*

bombermwc
07-28-2014, 08:01 AM
Surely we can get the titled corrected...not sure how you can mess up the name of the building....

RadicalModerate
07-28-2014, 08:13 AM
*Murrah*

So the Murray Building doesn't matter?

Martin
07-28-2014, 08:18 AM
thread title fixed. -M

lasomeday
07-28-2014, 08:39 AM
Read the Third Terrorist. It proves there are more people involved and the government is covering it up.

Just the facts
07-28-2014, 09:28 AM
Read the Third Terrorist. It proves there are more people involved and the government is covering it up.

Why would the government cover it up? They want us to believe there is a terrorist around every corner. It seems to me that covering it up would be counter-productive.

lasomeday
07-28-2014, 10:16 AM
Why would the government cover it up? They want us to believe there is a terrorist around every corner. It seems to me that covering it up would be counter-productive.

What country are you in JTF? This was back during the Clinton administration. They had a different policy.

jmpokc1957
07-28-2014, 10:21 AM
Why would the government cover it up? They want us to believe there is a terrorist around every corner. It seems to me that covering it up would be counter-productive.

You can say that again! We've gone from a commie under every bed to a terrorist under every bed. I guess Washington has to keep pumping out the fear. Give us our rights back and I can deal with the fear.

Jersey Boss
07-28-2014, 10:37 AM
What country are you in JTF? This was back during the Clinton administration. They had a different policy.

But why the cover up, and what policies were different that would apply here?

Chadanth
07-28-2014, 10:47 AM
Read the Third Terrorist. It proves there are more people involved and the government is covering it up.

It doesn't prove it, it lays out some evidence and speculation.

kelroy55
07-28-2014, 11:17 AM
What country are you in JTF? This was back during the Clinton administration. They had a different policy.

They had a different policy about terrorism? What was their policy?

kevinpate
07-28-2014, 01:26 PM
I looked under my bed last nap. No commies. No terrorists. No evil monkey in the closet either.

I did learn something though. The spooky voice I thought I was hearing outside my window at night may actually be coming from a giant dust bunny. At least I think it's a dust bunny. Dust bunnies have piercing red eyes, right? right?

turnpup
07-28-2014, 01:34 PM
[ATTACH=CONFIG]I did learn something though. The spooky voice I thought I was hearing outside my window at night may actually be coming from a giant dust bunny. At least I think it's a dust bunny. Dust bunnies have piercing red eyes, right? right?

8759

RadicalModerate
07-28-2014, 01:38 PM
That rabbit pic reminds me that I haven't watched Monty Python's In Search of the Holy Grail in awhile . . .

Mel
07-28-2014, 02:40 PM
run away run away

Filthy
07-28-2014, 02:56 PM
I'm just curious to know why none of the video evidence has never been released. I know there are bits and pieces...but, I assume there's a lot more video of that day, than has been released. I'm not a conspiracy theorist...and I don't think anything is being hidden....or covered up. I just want to see the videos.

tfvc.org
07-28-2014, 03:15 PM
I don't think there was much more than we have seen. Remember back then there was not as much cameras or video surveillance as there is today. This was almost 20 years ago.

RadicalModerate
07-28-2014, 08:04 PM
(Beyond the nostalgic nudge from the Feral Rabbit pic . . .)

This entire thread reminds me that I haven't read this book in awhile neither . . .

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e8/The_Third_Terrorist_cover.jpg

(the author used to be a reporter for Channel Four . . . before it turned into tabloid TV . . .)

P.S.: Apparently a lot of "big-wigs"--at the time--thought that she was as convincing as did I.
The Middle East Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing, The Third Terrorist, Jayna Davis (http://www.jaynadavis.com/#!endorsements/cnnz)

But whaddaya gonna do . . . make a Federal Case out of it?
(I'm still wondering about the "Murray" Building that started off this entire conversation . . .)

ljbab728
07-28-2014, 08:39 PM
Speaking of taking threads to politics. If you don't think conspiracy talk about the OKC bombing and your giving an opinion to said conspiracy isn't politics, you are mistaken. It's just odd after you told me to take my post about Ukraine to 'Politics.'
I think they both should be there.

No, I don't think it has a thing to do with politics. It's about a crime and having the FBI involved does not make it so.

RadicalModerate
07-28-2014, 08:47 PM
No, I don't think it has a thing to do with politics. It's about a crime and having the FBI involved does not make it so.

Since the only, universal, practical definition of "Politics" is: "The authoritative allocation of resources" . . . just about everything--including a lot of crime-- is politics/political. Isn't it? Excuse me: Well . . . Ain't it?

ljbab728
07-28-2014, 08:49 PM
Since the only, universal, practical definition of "Politics" is: "The authoritative allocation of resources" . . . just about everything--including a lot of crime-- is politics/political. Isn't it? Excuse me: Well . . . Ain't it?

Uh, no. Not for the purposes it is used for in this forum, anyway. However, I know the location of Braums stores is a very political discussion. :rolleyes:

RadicalModerate
07-28-2014, 09:51 PM
Uh, no. Not for the purposes it is used for in this forum, anyway. However, I know the location of Braums stores is a very political discussion. :rolleyes:

Point taken. (but if you keep rolling your eyes like that they may get stuck that way =).
Frankly, I don't care where the new Braum's is placed as long as it isn't in the Ukraine.
And doesn't interfere with the ambiance of the Murray Building.
(say! why don't they come up with a new version of Risk!)

zookeeper
07-28-2014, 10:18 PM
No, I don't think it has a thing to do with politics. It's about a crime and having the FBI involved does not make it so.

Well, actually somebody shooting a plane out of the sky is a fairly serious crime, too. Nobody is sure what happened, it's the discussion about the possibilities that make it political. The discussion about the Murrah Bombing and conspiracy theories inherently makes it - political. I agreed the other thread should probably be in politics, but this one leads straight to the Clinton administration, right-wing militias, name-your-conspiracy, that's what the article you linked to is about. The man has thought for years that his brother was caught up in a political conspiracy that leads to very high places.

ljbab728
07-28-2014, 10:40 PM
Well, actually somebody shooting a plane out of the sky is a fairly serious crime, too. Nobody is sure what happened, it's the discussion about the possibilities that make it political. The discussion about the Murrah Bombing and conspiracy theories inherently makes it - political. I agreed the other thread should probably be in politics, but this one leads straight to the Clinton administration, right-wing militias, name-your-conspiracy, that's what the article you linked to is about. The man has thought for years that his brother was caught up in a political conspiracy that leads to very high places.

Well, we will agree to disagree then.