OJ's trial was 20 years ago, which is hard to believe it's been that long. I thought he was guilty then and I still think he's guilty now. He's where he belongs but just not for the right reason.


Watergate was 40 years ago and not sure if Washington learned anything from it. Nixon just happened to get caught.

I've mentioned this before, but Vincent Bugliosi--the guy who managed to get Charlie Manson convicted and put away forever--wrote a book about the O.J. Simpson trial that ranks among the best books I've ever read. The name of the book is "Outrage." His main contention is that O.J. was absolutely guilty of the crime and that it was complete incompetence on the part of the prosecution that resulted in him walking away a "free" man.

The only thing good that came out of the O.J. case was this:
9Ifgj8WXp8w

"If the lid don't fit, you can't acquit."

As far as Watergate goes . . . I agree with your assessment.

I'll have to read that book, it sounds interesting.