I guess I'll be the one to post a thread on this. Every pervert upskirt photographer arrested at WalMart or the fair or anywhere else is reported front page on NewsOK. When do they NOT do that? When it's one of their own reporters arrested for upskirt photography at the Moore High School's joint graduation, of all places.

Zeke Campfield Arrested Oklahoman reporter Zeke Campfield arrested; allegedly took upskirt photos at graduation ceremony for Moore high schools | The Lost Ogle (http://www.thelostogle.com/2013/05/30/oklahoman-reporter-zeke-campfield-was-arrested-for-allegedly-taking-upskirt-photos-at-the-moore-high-school-graduation/)
Zeke Campbell story getting stranger and stranger This Zeke Campfield story is getting stranger and stranger? | The Lost Ogle (http://www.thelostogle.com/2013/05/30/this-zeke-campfield-story-is-getting-stranger-and-stranger/)

The Oklahoman should come clean and report the story. They don't have to do an internal investigation first. Turn it over to a reporter and write it like you would any other story like this and list his occupation as a reporter for The Oklahoman. The internal investigation should be for your own internal issues. The story should be a story about an upskirt photographer arrested at the Moore High School's Joint Graduation, just like you do for anyone else when these things happen.

Did this transpire after the tornado? Wow.

Did this transpire after the tornado? Wow.

I read about it on TLO and then talked to someone at OCPD who told me that the cops knew about his past criminal arrest minutes after his booking and mug shot was taken. Zeke's story to the police about forgetting his SD card at home is just laughable. It's sad really and he needs help. You have to wonder about a guy who can deny these things and forget about the one thing that trips up perps all the time, surveillance cameras.

As they said on TLO, there's someone in HR who is also looking for a job, and that's the person responsible for conducting background checks.

zoo, there is a near blindness to security cameras. They are everywhere, more so now than even just 15 years back. Folks get so used to them they absolutely truly forget there is almost no where in a community one won't be captured to video while doing X, and while in route to and from the site of doing X.

Security cameras also free the falsely accused, Yanira Maldinado being one. She was released from a Mexican jail last night after a review of security camera footage showed that she carried only blankets, bottles of water and a purse, not marijuana.

Security cameras also free the falsely accused, Yanira Maldinado being one. She was released from a Mexican jail last night after a review of security camera footage showed that she carried only blankets, bottles of water and a purse, not marijuana.

Just saw that. Talk about a lucky turn of events.

yeppers. bad folks forget 'em, good folks forget 'em, and bad folk who pretend to be good folk forget 'em too. And then of course, there are the umpteen gajillon smartphones out and about as well. It's all good ... sort of.

Maybe not as quick as some would hope but it was reported in the Oklahoman.

Reporter for The Oklahoman arrested on assault complaint | News OK (http://newsok.com/reporter-for-the-oklahoman-arrested-on-assault-complaint/article/3840471?custom_click=pod_headline_crime)

And updated their story today (6/6/2013).... Teen prostitution connection.

FBI investigates former Oklahoman reporter | News OK (http://newsok.com/fbi-investigates-former-oklahoman-reporter/article/3842584)

Nathaniel Zeke Campfield has been charged - but only just barely.

Former reporter faces Oklahoma City municipal charge | News OK (http://newsok.com/former-reporter-faces-oklahoma-city-municipal-charge/article/3894718)

The offense is punishable by a $167 fine.

The FBI also investigated Campfield after a 16-year-old prostitute claimed in May he paid her for sex. He told agents he did not hire the prostitute. No charges resulted from that investigation.


$167... How will he recover from that high fine?

A prostitute complained he paid her for sex? Isn't that what he's supposed to do?

The offense is punishable by a $167 fine.

The FBI also investigated Campfield after a 16-year-old prostitute claimed in May he paid her for sex. He told agents he did not hire the prostitute. No charges resulted from that investigation.


$167... How will he recover from that high fine?

A prostitute complained he paid her for sex? Isn't that what he's supposed to do?

Considering the prostitute was a pregnant 16 year old who was deemed a victim of human trafficking (a charge the pimp was convicted of) - yeah, I think she has a right to 'complain.'

Considering the prostitute was a pregnant 16 year old who was deemed a victim of human trafficking (a charge the pimp was convicted of) - yeah, I think she has a right to 'complain.'

I wasn't debating her situation but the fact a prostitute was complaining a customer paid her.

I wasn't debating her situation but the fact a prostitute was complaining a customer paid her.

Well, her 'situation' is one where a 21-year old man was having her (while VERY pregnant) have sex with as many men as he could find for her. To some, that changes her status from 'a prostitute' to 'a victim.'

I get what you're saying - but the 'joke' rings about as 'funny' as "How do you rape a hooker? By not paying her."

Well, her 'situation' is one where a 21-year old man was having her (while VERY pregnant) have sex with as many men as he could find for her. To some, that changes her status from 'a prostitute' to 'a victim.'

I get what you're saying - but the 'joke' rings about as 'funny' as "How do you rape a hooker? By not paying her."

Yes Brian I understand that but once again I was just pointing out the irony of a hooker complaining she got paid. The article did not say she was pregnant at the time, is that the same prostitute your previous link identified as 19?

"An FBI agent wrote in a court affidavit that the prostitute said Campfield paid her $220 for sex at his residence. The agent reported the prostitute told Campfield in a text message she was 19"

Yes Brian I understand that but once again I was just pointing out the irony of a hooker complaining she got paid. The article did not say she was pregnant at the time, is that the same prostitute your previous link identified as 19?

"An FBI agent wrote in a court affidavit that the prostitute said Campfield paid her $220 for sex at his residence. The agent reported the prostitute told Campfield in a text message she was 19"

You'd be hard pressed to find an underage prostitute that is working either by choice or by force giving their real age.

My biggest gripe is that Zeke wasn't charged in relation to the prostitution activities with the minor.

You'd be hard pressed to find an underage prostitute that is working either by choice or by force giving their real age.

But is that the same prostitute your previous link identified as 19? I was just curious if it was the same girl.

But is that the same prostitute your previous link identified as 19? I was just curious if it was the same girl.

Yep.

OK thanks. Like I said I was curious because she identified herself as not being a minor.

OK thanks. Like I said I was curious because she identified herself as not being a minor.

Doesn't matter in the eyes of the law. 16 is the age of consent in Oklahoma, but not if prostitution was involved (regardless if the person swore they were over 18).

Brian - I'm a little confused. Can you clarify the law if a 15-year-old girl lies about her age and has sex...
...with a customer paying her as a prostitute?
...with a 21-year-old acting as her boyfriend?

Brian - I'm a little confused. Can you clarify the law if a 15-year-old girl lies about her age and has sex...
...with a customer paying her as a prostitute?
...with a 21-year-old acting as her boyfriend?

The law is pretty clear - A male/female can consent to sex at age 16 (unless it involves a teacher, etc.). However, prostitution draws the line at 18 (line between juvenile and adult prostitution, not between legal and illegal - its all illegal)

Regardless what age the girl claims she is.... if your pimping her or buying her, the law says you're in deep doo-doo.

Also, even in consensual sex, if the girl says she's 16 and she's really 15 - same pile of doo-doo for the guy.

In this case, the 21-year old was pimping her - more than a boyfriend and he pled guilty to human trafficking her.

However, had the 21 year old and 15 year old just been boyfriend and girlfriend and prostitution was not a factor, he could have still faced rape charges regardless of how old she told him she was.

I believe she was 15 when they met.

But this is where the greatest power we give our police officers and prosecutors comes into play - the power of discretion in how we interpret and pursue the law.

In this case, Zeke apparently gets to pay for sex with this pregnant minor who's dubbed a human trafficking victim and he faces no prosecution, no sex offender registration.

The girls pimp, who should have gone to prison for a very long time, instead gets a year of offender boot camp.

I'm amazed how much leeway we give sex offenders but seem to go overboard with drug offenders.

However, had the 21 year old and 15 year old just been boyfriend and girlfriend and prostitution was not a factor, he could have still faced rape charges regardless of how old she told him she was.

Doesn't the guy also get labeled as a sex offender? or is that just urban legend stuff?

If she was 19, does that still make her a minor? Is 21 the cutoff?

Doesn't the guy also get labeled as a sex offender? or is that just urban legend stuff?

Oh no, he most certainly can be forced to register as a sex offender. But it all comes down to the prosecutor and what they agree to.

The 'peeing in a park' conviction can lead to someone having to register as a sex offender, but that outcome is extremely rare.

The worst abuse of the sex offender laws I can recall is a kid participated in one of those file sharing services. He was guilty of downloading pirated songs, movies, games - BUT - unknown to him (even the prosecutor agreed the kid didn't know) his computer was being used to store and distribute child porn. Last I saw he was forced to register as a sex offender and the prosecutor claimed there was no way around it.

If she was 19, does that still make her a minor? Is 21 the cutoff?

If she was 19 - then the 'John' would only be guilty of a misdemeanor prostitution charge - unless circumstances existed to escalate it to a felony because he used his smart phone or computer to solicit the sex or it happened within 1,---' of a church or school.

The pimp could be guilty of anything ranging from aiding and abetting to pandering to human trafficking.

The child trafficking would only come into effect if the victim was under 18.

In this case the girl was 15/16 when she was prostituting. So could not give consent, therefore she was a victim.

There appeared to be more evidence in this case against Zeke than there was against Miskovsky III in 2009, but for whatever reason they are not charging Zeke.

Back on topic,... I remember quite some time ago, a well known former local TV news reporter and current local radio reporter for a popular sports team getting caught soliciting sexual favors down at Trosper park. The TV station he worked at wasted no time in throwing him under the bus.