View Full Version : Kids Found Dead Classmate's Brain at Morgue



Thunder
10-02-2010, 11:37 AM
What a world!


(Oct. 2) -- The parents of a New York teen killed in a car crash five years ago are suing the city's medical examiner for keeping their dead son's brain floating in a jar at the morgue for months without telling them.

But what's worse is how they found out: The boy's classmates, including his girlfriend, spotted it labeled with his name while they were on a school field trip to the mortuary.

"A couple of the kids noticed it immediately, and the kids who knew him became really distraught," Andre and Korisha Shipley's lawyer, Marvin Ben-Aron, told The New York Post. Some of the students even took cell phone photos of the brain floating in a jar, before they were confiscated by their teacher, he said.

Jesse Jerome Shipley, a 17-year-old student at Staten Island's Port Richmond High School, died from skull fractures suffered during a car accident on Jan. 9, 2005. His father authorized an autopsy the next day.

But his parents didn't know that medical examiners kept Shipley's brain for further study, even after they returned his body to his family for burial.

Months later, some of his classmates who are members of the high school's forensics club took a field trip to the local morgue where Shipley's autopsy was performed.

"There was a case that you could see through, and there were brains in jars and names on the jars. One said 'head trauma, Shipley, J,'" one of the students, Samantha Feldman, told the New York Daily News. She said Shipley's girlfriend and her best friend were in the group, and spotted the ghastly name tag.

"The best friend went outside and was flipping out," Feldman was quoted as saying. "She started crying and called her mom and said, 'Mom, Jesse's brain is here! I can't be here.'"

Later that day, the students returned to class and the school was abuzz with gossip about what they'd seen. Shipley's 14-year-old sister Shannon, who was a passenger and survived the same car crash that killed him, was at school and heard about her brother's brain in a jar.

"She fell apart," Ben-Aron told the Post. She was "hysterical," and school administrators had to call her parents to bring her home from school early, he said. "It was definitely very traumatic for the parents and for Shannon."

The Shipleys filed an emergency order against the medical examiner's office, barring any further dissections or research on their son's brain without notifying them first. The organ was finally returned, and the family held another funeral service and re-burial for the boy's full remains.

In March 2006, the Shipleys sued the city and the medical examiner's office, seeking to recover damages for mishandling their son's remains. At the time, the acting deputy chief medical examiner on Staten Island, Dr. Stephen de Roux, said he had to wait months before analyzing Shipley's brain because he had to collect six brains in order for the city's top medical examiner to travel to Staten Island to dissect them.

"Then it's kind of worth [the examiner's] while to make the trip to Staten Island to examine the six brains," de Roux testified, according to the local news website SILive.com. "It doesn't make sense for him to come and do one."

The lawsuit got tied up in legal proceedings for three years, but in March 2009, a judge turned down the medical examiner's request that the suit be tossed out. And on Friday, an appeals court ruled that the Shipley's do indeed have a legal right to sue the city.

"[W]hile the medical examiner has the statutory authority ... to remove and retain bodily organs for further examination and testing in connection therewith, he or she also has the mandated obligation ... to turn over the decedent's remains to the next of kin for preservation and proper burial once the legitimate purposes for the retention of those remains have been fulfilled," Justice William F. Mastro wrote in the decision, excerpted by the New York Law Journal.

http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/dead-teenager-jesse-jerome-shipleys-brain-spotted-on-field-trip/19658130?ncid=webmail

Roadhawg
10-06-2010, 07:22 AM
amazing

MustangGT
10-06-2010, 10:38 AM
Interesting but irrelevant to OKC.

BBatesokc
10-06-2010, 10:44 AM
Interesting but irrelevant to OKC.

Seriously? If that's the criteria to post in this forum then you could have made that useless 'point' long before now.

OKC Underground = "Forum for general conversation, shared interests, have a laugh or discuss anything not related to any of the other forums."

MustangGT
10-06-2010, 11:16 AM
From the title I expected OKC Underground to apply to anything that did not apply in the other forums but still applied to OKC based upon the forum title. Lighten up a bit huh.

Thunder
10-06-2010, 11:25 AM
Interesting but irrelevant to OKC.

LOL'd. He attacked this one, but left every others alone.

MustangGT
10-06-2010, 12:39 PM
If you had checked the forum you would have seen this is not my first post in this one. Now who is the unaware one???

Thunder
10-06-2010, 03:11 PM
If you had checked the forum you would have seen this is not my first post in this one. Now who is the unaware one???

Underground is for general discussions for anything. You failed.

MustangGT
10-06-2010, 06:10 PM
Failure is YOUR state of mind. Not reality. You DO NOT define my reality.

Martin
10-06-2010, 07:12 PM
you guys are getting bent out of shape as to whether or not this thread was posted in the right place.

let's get back to topic. -M

MustangGT
10-06-2010, 07:33 PM
Agreed.

Midtowner
10-07-2010, 11:28 AM
It sounds like they're still at the Motion to Dismiss level from the way the story is written. That means (probably here anyhow) that based on any set of facts, there is no claim upon which relief can be granted. It's still not close to going to trial yet. There may be a cause of action for conversion since the body is not the property of the morgue, but what value do you place on a dead kid's brain? That'd be your measure of damages. There's certainly not intentional infliction of emotional distress here. I guess academically speaking, there may be a case, but whether it's anything worth pursuing? I don't see the money here.