Widgets Magazine
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: Goldsby Rumors and News

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Goldsby Rumors and News

    So they downgraded the interchange and removed a ramp that would have been paid for by a third party. A ramp that would have taken traffic off the other ramps for commuters trying to get home.

    Who the hell made this decision?

  2. Default Re: Goldsby Rumors and News

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    So they downgraded the interchange and removed a ramp that would have been paid for by a third party. A ramp that would have taken traffic off the other ramps for commuters trying to get home.

    Who the hell made this decision?
    I think you're greatly overestimating the amount of benefit a direct ramp to the Riverwind parking lot would have done. The majority of people exiting here are commuters heading to Blanchard. While Riverwind traffic does add to the strain on the interchange, improving access to westbound SH-9 will ultimately help both Riverwind traffic and Blanchard traffic. Hopefully this plan will also result in closing the direct entrance and exit to Riverwind's north valet from SH-9 and routing it through either the new signalized intersection at Harvey/NW 12th and the existing one at Bankers Drive. That will help really reduce the number of conflict points where vehicles can cross paths in this area, which will increase safety.

    Both the diverging diamond and SPUI options here make a lot of sense, because the majority of traffic flow is from the north to the west and vice-versa, and those interchange types serve that type of traffic pattern well. I have a feeling the diverging diamond option will be chosen, because the bridge is only about 10 years old and they would be able to re-use it for the new interchange. I'm not sure what the "reliever" ramp shown in a few of the options is for, though. It looks like they expect Riverwind traffic to take that and then loop around the south edge of the Riverwind property and come back north, but I don't think anyone is actually going to do that.

    Interestingly, this will be the second time this interchange has been totally redone in my lifetime. The current setup only dates from about 2005 or so. Before then, here's what it looked like (1961 aerial):

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Purcell Rumors and News
    By macfoucin in forum Suburban & Other OK Communities
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 11-17-2023, 09:59 AM
  2. Non-Tower Development Rumors( speculation, news and ideas) post here!
    By HOT ROD in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 09-13-2014, 11:35 PM
  3. Devon Exxon rumors
    By Dustbowl in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 04-03-2008, 12:21 PM
  4. Rumors re Friday's, Fuddrucker in S. OKC
    By SoonerDave in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-09-2006, 08:37 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO