Widgets Magazine
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 52

Thread: Kilpatrick turnpike question

  1. #26

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Another point about left-side ramps off and on a freeway - I agree that they are best avoided in designing freeway-to-arterial-road interchanges, but when it's a freeway-to-freeway interchange it's not as big of a deal IMO.

  2. Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by KL_Moore View Post
    Another point about left-side ramps off and on a freeway - I agree that they are best avoided in designing freeway-to-arterial-road interchanges, but when it's a freeway-to-freeway interchange it's not as big of a deal IMO.
    I think it's confusion and expectations of truckers and travelers who are looking for right-side exits. I you are getting on I40 EB from MacArthur or Meridian must cross the entire hiway to catch NBI44 Plus, EB I40 to NB I44 is really a sharp turn at night or for those unfamiliar with it.

  3. Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by KL_Moore View Post
    Another point about left-side ramps off and on a freeway - I agree that they are best avoided in designing freeway-to-arterial-road interchanges, but when it's a freeway-to-freeway interchange it's not as big of a deal IMO.
    They are deprecated in federal design standards as a safety hazard. Not only do you have to worry about drivers "death diving" across the freeway to make an exit at the last moment, but putting slow-moving ramp traffic in with fast-moving left-lane traffic is a major risk factor.

  4. #29

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott5114 View Post
    They are deprecated in federal design standards as a safety hazard. Not only do you have to worry about drivers "death diving" across the freeway to make an exit at the last moment, but putting slow-moving ramp traffic in with fast-moving left-lane traffic is a major risk factor.
    like all the truckers merging onto I35 south coming from the Turner and trying to get off at 122nd... i've only been driving that stretch of road regularly since March and I've almost been hit by a truck 3 times. left lane exits/entrances are terrible and unsafe

  5. #30
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,668
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Worst is southbound I-44 onto eastbound I-40 (at the fairgrounds) merging onto the lest lane and needing to exit at the OKC Blvd. on the right hand exit.

  6. #31
    HangryHippo Guest

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    Worst is southbound I-44 onto eastbound I-40 (at the fairgrounds) merging onto the lest lane and needing to exit at the OKC Blvd. on the right hand exit.
    I had forgotten about this because I usually never take it, but you're absolutely right! People coming from the left lane have almost taken me out trying to make the Blvd. exit. It's ridiculous.

  7. #32

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    I'd like to nominate 44 west to 40 east needing to go to the stockyards. I make that drive to work every day.

  8. #33

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    Worst is southbound I-44 onto eastbound I-40 (at the fairgrounds) merging onto the lest lane and needing to exit at the OKC Blvd. on the right hand exit.
    It’s pretty bad the other direction too, people from the Blvd needing to get over to the left hand lane for I-44 west. There’s about 7 lanes that need to be crossed in a half mile or so.

  9. #34

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott5114 View Post
    They are deprecated in federal design standards as a safety hazard. ....putting slow-moving ramp traffic in with fast-moving left-lane traffic is a major risk factor.
    Yes, I just love the people who get in the left lane 3 miles before the left-hand exit and defiantly drive 60mph as traffic passes them on the right. (Northbound I-35 to I-40W and southbound I-35 to Highway 77 in Norman are two of the worst spots for this.)

  10. #35

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by seajohn View Post
    Yes, I just love the people who get in the left lane 3 miles before the left-hand exit and defiantly drive 60mph as traffic passes them on the right. (Northbound I-35 to I-40W and southbound I-35 to Highway 77 in Norman are two of the worst spots for this.)
    how dare people drive the speed limit. you do know that even if you are in the far left lane, you are not allowed to exceed the speed limit, correct? now if you had said they were driving 50, or 45... i would agree with you, this is annoying...

  11. #36

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    how dare people drive the speed limit. you do know that even if you are in the far left lane, you are not allowed to exceed the speed limit, correct? now if you had said they were driving 50, or 45... i would agree with you, this is annoying...
    Yes, how dare they is correct because they are more dangerous than people that are keeping up with traffic flow exceeding the speed limit.

  12. #37

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    how dare people drive the speed limit. you do know that even if you are in the far left lane, you are not allowed to exceed the speed limit, correct? now if you had said they were driving 50, or 45... i would agree with you, this is annoying...
    Actually impeding traffic in the left lane is against the law regardless of speed (and impeding has been found to be much more dangerous than speeding ). And is now a 235 dollar ticket

  13. #38

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    Actually impeding traffic in the left lane is against the law regardless of speed (and impeding has been found to be much more dangerous than speeding ). And is now a 235 dollar ticket
    correct. but being in the left lane while approaching a left lane exit and traveling the speed limit, would not be impeding.

  14. #39

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    Yes, how dare they is correct because they are more dangerous than people that are keeping up with traffic flow exceeding the speed limit.
    more dangerous, yes... but no more illegal

  15. #40

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    more dangerous, yes... but no more illegal
    It is illegal...impeding traffic can get you a ticket.

  16. #41

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by jonny d View Post
    It is illegal...impeding traffic can get you a ticket.
    but you are not impeding traffic if there is a left exit approaching.

    yes i'm also one who thinks left exits are dangerous and shouldn't be used... but they are. and being in the left lane as one is approaching and driving the speed limit (while dangerous) is perfectly legal. atleast according to OHP almost a year ago

    https://kfor.com/2017/11/01/what-dri...now-in-effect/
    from the bottom of the article

    But, there are exceptions:

    You can move into the left lane if you need to allow someone to enter the highway. However, you must move back to the right lane as soon as you get the chance.
    You’re also allowed to move to the left lane if the lane is an exit or an entrance to another highway.
    OHP said congestion is also a factor: if the flow of traffic doesn’t allow you to move to the right and you are going the speed limit, then you aren’t breaking the rules.
    OHP also said you can’t move to the left lane and exceed the speed limit just to pass other cars that are going the speed limit in the right lane.
    look at the second and third exceptions. so if traffic is a factor, and you are in the left lane, and you are going the speed limit... you are in the right... even if others want to go faster

  17. #42

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by jedicurt View Post
    how dare people drive the speed limit. you do know that even if you are in the far left lane, you are not allowed to exceed the speed limit, correct? now if you had said they were driving 50, or 45... i would agree with you, this is annoying...
    An exit 3 miles away is not a scenario where you can impede the traffic.

  18. #43

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Oh good, this argument again. It's been a minute, we're overdue.

  19. #44

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    you all can believe whatever you want... i'm just stating what OHP has said... and they are kind of the ones that determine how to enforce it...

  20. #45

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Did they say "you can be in the left lane to take an exit" or did they say "you can be in the left lane starting at Meridian/McArthur/Rockwell/Council/Yukon as long as you plan on taking the exit"?

  21. #46

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by d-usa View Post
    Did they say "you can be in the left lane to take an exit" or did they say "you can be in the left lane starting at Meridian/McArthur/Rockwell/Council/Yukon as long as you plan on taking the exit"?
    depends... is there "Congestion" preventing you from getting over at McArthur, and thus by the time you got over, you would just be getting right back in the left again? Yukon... that's a ridiculous argument. especially since the last thing they said is that it is not legal to get in the left lane to pass people who are going the speed limit in the right lane... so the basis for how all of this started is flawed.

  22. #47

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    So the actual correct interpretation of what OHP said would be "of course it's okay to be in the left lane to take a left-lane exit with current traffic conditions determining if you are impeding traffic rather than merging into an exit lane" rather than accepting it as an approval to camp out in the left lane as long as you are planning to take an exit in that lane at some point in the future.

  23. #48

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by d-usa View Post
    So the actual correct interpretation of what OHP said would be "of course it's okay to be in the left lane to take a left-lane exit with current traffic conditions determining if you are impeding traffic rather than merging into an exit lane" rather than accepting it as an approval to camp out in the left lane as long as you are planning to take an exit in that lane at some point in the future.
    the original statement that brought this up was this quote
    Yes, I just love the people who get in the left lane 3 miles before the left-hand exit and defiantly drive 60mph as traffic passes them on the right. (Northbound I-35 to I-40W and southbound I-35 to Highway 77 in Norman are two of the worst spots for this.)
    which implies that you should allow for faster traffic to pass you on the left... OHP also says that is not legal, which is all i was trying to say.

    my response was simply
    how dare people drive the speed limit. you do know that even if you are in the far left lane, you are not allowed to exceed the speed limit, correct? now if you had said they were driving 50, or 45... i would agree with you, this is annoying...
    even if one vehicle is not driving legally... the person who wants to pass them also is not driving legally.... i don't even know how this became an argument over the left lane... because i wasn't the first that brought it up as impeding... and then i just mentioned that as you approach (which yes, is subjective as to distance), it is not impeding.. and then the whole tread freaks out.

    the reality of all of this is.... you are not supposed to be going faster than the speed limit in the first place... deal with it

  24. #49

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Breaking the law to spite people breaking the law is stupid.

  25. #50

    Default Re: Kilpatrick turnpike question

    Quote Originally Posted by d-usa View Post
    Breaking the law to spite people breaking the law is stupid.
    agreed... so is spiting people who are breaking law because it is preventing you from breaking the law. glad we are all on the same page. so back to the turnpike

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. I-35 and Kilpatrick Turnpike
    By Pete in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-12-2021, 06:52 AM
  2. Kilpatrick Turnpike to be widened
    By warreng88 in forum Transportation
    Replies: 268
    Last Post: 05-29-2014, 02:20 PM
  3. Saturday's @ Penn and Kilpatrick/Memorial
    By okcfollower in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-04-2012, 10:00 PM
  4. New Ramps at May/Kilpatrick
    By jbrown84 in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-30-2010, 07:26 PM
  5. I-40 & Kilpatrick Turnpike Structure?
    By Doug Loudenback in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-25-2006, 10:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO