Originally Posted by
bombermwc
My understanding is that it would bring to question about how they do this sort of thing so it would force a re-do. I'm not legally in the trenches on this by any means, but if it impacts the financials, i would think that it would impact the deployment at all. Meaning, if they can't fund it this way, how will they? So how would they do the project at all?
My money is betting that the SCOTOK votes in favor of OTA and this is a non-issue. The groups fighting against it have not been very truthful in public so I think it's hurt their case quite a bit in the public eye. It may not be the residents even, rather other groups working against OTA that embellish the story. But so far, I'm not seeing anything that does anything other than delay, not cancel. Thoughts?
Bookmarks