Also they have already started building an East bound exit to the Kilpatrick from Southbound Broadway extension.
Also they have already started building an East bound exit to the Kilpatrick from Southbound Broadway extension.
Great news. I just wish they would work on getting a Northwest Loop and convert waterloo into a freeway
"extend the Kickapoo and kilpatrick to meet at I35"
The Kilpatrick already goes to l35. Is this an extension to go north towards Guthrie?
Edit: Nevermind, l found a free article explaining it is south l35.
https://okpolicy.org/in-the-know-sta...udget-process/
I also hope they include a full stack at Tidesdale and Gilcrease freeways
Is the Kilpatrick extension to I35 part of the plan to re-designate I240, or is this going to be a new highway?
It sounds like it is building out the rest of the 90s era Kilpatrick extension plan (which the current part only did somewhere between the first quarter to third of); in that plan the turnpike would turn south where it meets Airport road, continue south past the airport, then turn south east till around Western (60th in Norman), where it would then run east west and have a juncture around where highway 77 and i35 merge.
I wonder if the Kickapoo extension will extend South to HW-9 East of Norman or will it tie back to I-35 North of Norman?
Im a tad lazy to look back but driving down broadway extension yesterday I saw what looks like them clearing out land for a southbound ext to eastbound turnpike ramp. Anyone have anything on this?
Just placing a cloverleaf ramp. Better than nothing but it should be a flyover.
Well, the Turnpike Authority can do what it wants since they are not tied to the state coffers. If they wanted to do a flyover they would, but they are driven by traffic counts not solely desires. Now, not to say it wasn't weird to not have a ramp there to begin with -- and same with not having flyovers to WB JKT over at SH74 -- all that is strange. But they will cite that they will only sell bonds to build what "is needed" and they just take that a little more seriously to the penny. LOL. Also, if you notice Texas is building more and more turnpikes and keeps expanding the one's they have. I know a lot of people have problems with turnpikes (not saying you do, rather in general), but I really like them as they usually are a better facility to drive on that state-maintained highways.
I've been wondering about that construction, it will be nice to finally have the missing ramp at that intersection.
Its probably easier for turnpike authority to justify replacing a dangerous cloverleaf 10 to 20 years down the road than to build a flyover for a ramp that is safe because it is non-existant. Thats kind of like stoplights at interchanges that don't exist yet. Usually start off with stop signs.
Took me a long time to find the OTA meeting replays but finally found the 12/7/21 meeting at https://video.ibm.com/recorded/131199756. Tim Gatz speaks about the need for the South metro connections starting around 2:17:30 into the video. Among other things he discusses the need to add a I-35 turnpike connection crossing the South Canadian River around Purcell. I believe this would be the Kickapoo extension to I-35. This is also discussed in the Purcell Register at http://purcellregister.com/stories/t...ell-area,34520.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks