Re: Producers Coop
Originally Posted by
Pete
1. The amount of TIF investment thus far in the core is minuscule in comparison to public investment and private investment by those not receiving any public subsidy whatsoever. Like well less than 1%. So absolutely no way you can correlate TIF expenditures to higher property values elsewhere.
2. Schools have only recently been brought to the table regarding future TIF's and have received information that is incomplete and also misleading. I just mentioned that the people involved in the OKC TIF's don't even understand the impact on schools and yet they gave a proposal to City Council (and the schools) that said it worked to their benefit. When I cited that presentation and asked for the background numbers and data to support the claims, I was then told they didn't fully understand how all this works on a state level, where the school allocations are actually made.
Pete, not to discount your thought or dispute in any way - however, Point 1 may very well be why the city/state uses TIF the way they do; if it is true that TIF represents a very small amount of development in the core and we're still getting the volume of self supporting development then why should we restrict/regulate TIF?
I agree there shuold be controls and accountability added to TIF including clawbacks for those who do not deliver within a certain tolerance as was proposed (unless there's approval of a variance). But eliminating TIF might result in a backlash on property tax appreciation/funding far greater than what you're suggesting the normal channels aren't gaining WITH it.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Bookmarks