GE was probably already going in another direction than originally planned back when they first announced the Baker Hughes merger with their oil and gas unit. This facility hasn't really been around that long to accomplish much.
GE was probably already going in another direction than originally planned back when they first announced the Baker Hughes merger with their oil and gas unit. This facility hasn't really been around that long to accomplish much.
Maybe the new Prez at OU could make a joint venture with BH and the Engineering and Petroleum Engineering departments to conduct research there and offer advanced degree programs there. This would be a great fit with the University of OK and with their already existing MBA facility nearby. BH could negotiate a first right of refusal on technology developed there and OU and the citizens of OK could share in revenue derived from licensing, etc. Professors would be drawn there too as they would also share in the revenue. And, with OU having the business incubation center there in the district, there might be a number of new companies formed for commercialization, such as has been done on the bio-med side.
I think there might be a precedent with OSU and Conoco in Ponca City with the old R&D center which I believe houses their sensor development program.
Does this revenue sharing ever actually happen? I honestly don't know, have never worked for/dealt with energy companies, but I've never heard of revenue sharing like that any place I've worked (DoD, banks, IBM, Arthur Andersen, public utilities, software development companies, a few other industries).
Remember, OKC out-fought Norman and OU for this facility.
All of those companies are probably major clients of Baker Hughes so the proximity is still beneficial in collaborating with the company engineers and geologists. Even if it turns into a Baker Hughes only research facility, it wouldn't hurt their ability to work with any of our local E&Ps or others around the country since they're not in the same market segment as the E&Ps are (CHK was in the space for a time, but hasn't been since they sold off NOMAC and it's other oil field operations companies). If BH sees it as a major asset that could improve their profitability and marketing efforts, it could end up being an even bigger focus for them than it was for GE and they could dump more resources into it than GE did. Not to mention that while GE did have an O&G presence, it wasn't their primary focus. It obviously is BH's primary focus.
I agree with whoever said it above on the scientists and researchers. They all have some type of oil and gas related backgrounds and BH is a massive international company so unless BH just shuts down the whole operations (which would be pretty stupid) I doubt they would be affect much by this.
All of that is just speculation so we'll have to wait and see, but I definitely don't think it's necessarily bad news.
I imagine the GE logo will soon be coming down.
^ this to me is the biggest impact of this, no longer having a major world brand. Otherwise, spinoffs and acquisitions happen all of the time.
Just wish we knew what BH's mission is and how they plan to use the facility.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
There is a puffy article behind the paywall on the Oklahoman.
Basically says they want to be more of an 'innovation' facility and spur start-ups.
But it also says the General Manager has retired (Michael Ming who was one of the first hires and has been the boss since that time) and the new head is a 33 year-old who was promoted from within.
I've also been told there has been quite a bit of turnover there. Would be interesting to know how many of the original 120 still remain.
That’s great news.
Baker Hughes GE is a publicly traded subsidury of GE. So it's still GE.
https://www.chron.com/business/energ...e-14308499.php
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks