Widgets Magazine
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 61

Thread: River Towers

  1. #26

    Default Re: River Towers

    Urbanism has nothing to do with population, building height, or geographic size. It is all about density. Healdton is more urban than most of the area around downtown OKC.

  2. #27

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by dmoor82 View Post
    Development like JTF posted,would even make Spartan happy!Just kiddin' Nick.LOL
    Ha, no kidding.

  3. #28

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    Ha, no kidding.
    No it wouldn't, he'd still find fault somewhere, wrong color of light poles, font on street signs to bold, trash container to tall, parking in the back not far enough back, etc; etc;

  4. #29

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by rcjunkie View Post
    No it wouldn't, he'd still find fault somewhere, wrong color of light poles, font on street signs to bold, trash container to tall, parking in the back not far enough back, etc; etc;
    Tool.

  5. #30

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    Tool.
    Correction, "a tool that's speaks the truth".

  6. Default Re: River Towers

    JTF - Urbanism also has to have a reason to start up. It doesn't happen in the middle of no where for a reason. And population and land availability DO have EVERYTHING to do with it.

    Think about it - you dont' have an urban environment out in a rural town, now do you? Just as I mentioned, as long as land is plentiful and cheap, there's no reason to go UP. Why do you think we have so much of a commercial presense on Memorial Rd or NW Expressway? Look at somewhere like NYC or Tokyo. Land is at a huge premium, so where it makes sense, they go up. In NYC you'll see lowrises in the middle because of bedrock issues. And if you don't think land/population have something to do with it, then go back about 150 years and look at NYC....when there were farms on the land and the highrise hadn't been invented yet.

    But anyway, back on topic about C2S....

  7. #32

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by bombermwc View Post
    JTF - Urbanism also has to have a reason to start up. It doesn't happen in the middle of no where for a reason. And population and land availability DO have EVERYTHING to do with it.

    Think about it - you dont' have an urban environment out in a rural town, now do you?
    Small towns are the most urban. You can walk everywhere you need to go. I lived in Healdton for two years and I could walk to everything.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,695
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: River Towers

    Lol. I grew up on a farm. We could walk from the house to the barn, to the chicken house and all the way to the creek. Guess it was more urban than I thought.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,695
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    Small towns are the most urban. You can walk everywhere you need to go. I lived in Healdton for two years and I could walk to everything.
    Seriously? A town of 2500 with literally 88%
    poor white only and single family houses. No diversity. No density. No development. And this is more urban development?

  10. #35

    Default Re: River Towers

    Healdton is the same size and population of my subdivision but they also have a post office, bank, restaurants, schools, retailers, etc. You tell me which is more urban. My subdivision has none of those things.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,695
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    Healdton is the same size and population of my subdivision but they also have a post office, bank, restaurants, schools, retailers, etc. You tell me which is more urban. My subdivision has none of those things.
    Interesting criteria for defining urban. Guess my neighborhood is uber urban afterall. Good perspective.

  12. #37

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    Interesting criteria for defining urban. Guess my neighborhood is uber urban afterall. Good perspective.
    Other than race and income, how do you define urban?

  13. #38
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,695
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: River Towers

    Read! It isnt race and income. It is diversity. Would have the same comments if it were a wealthy Martian ghetto with yards and fences. You can argue class and race if you have no other view, but it is basic definitian of urban...dense, diverse and properly developedl. Hooterville, OK isn't urban. Sorry.

  14. #39

    Default Re: River Towers

    Perth is 94% white. Is it not urban? Tokyo is 99% Asian. Is it not urban?

    So now that we have established diversity does not equal urban, what is left?

  15. #40
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,695
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: River Towers

    You've made the perfect argument. Urban is defined as walkability plus a Walgreens. LOL. Healdton, NYC. No difference. Edmond, Sydney. No difference.

  16. #41

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    Perth is 94% white. Is it not urban? Tokyo is 99% Asian. Is it not urban?

    So now that we have established diversity does not equal urban, what is left?
    There is an established expectation for a city in the U.S. or Europe to pull diversity from the entire world. This expectation does not apply to Japan, a country that has virtually zero multicultural policy to speak of.

  17. #42

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    There is an established expectation for a city in the U.S. or Europe to pull diversity from the entire world. This expectation does not apply to Japan, a country that has virtually zero multicultural policy to speak of.
    You missed the point and the point is, diversity does not equal urban. Other than the US and Western Europe - every major city in the world is mono-cultural.

  18. #43

    Default Re: River Towers

    I just think that you're making an exaggerated point. Urban means intrinsic things, not any of these cut-and-dry things you've boiled it down to.

  19. #44

    Default Re: River Towers

    What exactly was/is the conceptual use for the River Towers? Residential, office, etc.?

  20. #45
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,695
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    You missed the point and the point is, diversity does not equal urban. Other than the US and Western Europe - every major city in the world is mono-cultural.
    I am sorry. Thought we were discussing Urbanism expectations in the US. Specifically in OKC.

  21. #46

    Default Re: River Towers

    I felt a cold coming on today so I got in the elevator, went down to the first floor, crossed the street to Walgreens, bought some Wal-born and was back at my desk in under 10 minutes. For dinner I walked over to Giovani's on Chestnut and got two slices of pizza and some garlic bread knots. It was a little cold on the way back so I cut through Macy's. While it might not be for everyone - I loved it.


  22. #47

    Default Re: River Towers

    Huh?

  23. #48

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    Huh?
    Kerry is explaining his adventures in the big city so us uncivilized people will know what we're missing.

  24. #49

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by ljbab728 View Post
    Kerry is explaining his adventures in the big city so us uncivilized people will know what we're missing.
    Well sort of. I was making a quality of life point.

  25. #50

    Default Re: River Towers

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    I just think that you're making an exaggerated point. Urban means intrinsic things, not any of these cut-and-dry things you've boiled it down to.
    You are confusing me with Rover. He is the one saying Urban is X, Y, and Z. I am saying urban can exist everywhere and takes many forms. It isn't population, diversity, and tall buildings. It exist in small towns, individual neighborhoods, medium cities, and large cities. In fact, the best large cities are actually just a conglomeration of individual neighborhoods.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Anyone Ever lived in Lakeview Towers?
    By chase2324 in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-26-2010, 10:50 AM
  2. KOMA towers
    By old okie in forum Moore
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-14-2010, 10:54 AM
  3. Braniff Towers update!
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-20-2007, 08:02 PM
  4. Downtown towers question
    By JWil in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-27-2007, 10:13 PM
  5. New office towers on the way downtown?
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-07-2004, 12:09 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO