Convention Center

**MDot** · 11-04-2011, 10:59 PM

Originally Posted by ljbab728

Not necessarily, MDot. It's just that the cost may be more than some thought.

Ahhh. I wasnt't thinking of it in that sense because of how greedy the city can be sometimes or how they actually don't have enough money to build something as nice and/or big as it was hyped up to be.

**ljbab728** · 11-04-2011, 11:10 PM

Originally Posted by MDot

Ahhh. I wasnt't thinking of it in that sense because of how greedy the city can be sometimes or how they actually don't have enough money to build something as nice and/or big as it was hyped up to be.

No, MDot. It's not about the city being greedy. It's about getting what is necessary to assure that the convention center is successful. And nobody knows for sure at this point how it would be funded. It could be totally private, totally public, or some combination of public and private money. There is currently no public money designated for a hotel.

**MDot** · 11-05-2011, 10:23 AM

Originally Posted by ljbab728

No, MDot. It's not about the city being greedy. It's about getting what is necessary to assure that the convention center is successful. And nobody knows for sure at this point how it would be funded. It could be totally private, totally public, or some combination of public and private money. There is currently no public money designated for a hotel.

I wasnt't saying they were being greedy ljbab728, I was saying that's why I didn't consider it because of past circumstances; I get your point, I never misunderstood after your first response. So thanks for explaining though.