Widgets Magazine
Page 12 of 32 FirstFirst ... 7891011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 792

Thread: Staybridge Suites

  1. #276

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    the building design will improve and will most likely be all or almost all brick the site plan doesn't really bother me .. it is what it is ... but i wouldn't call it "mediocre"

    this location is not close to anything else in bricktown
    So the arrangement of the physical world holds no inherant value to you? Just, here is a hotel that generates X dollars per year (number of rooms X rate X occupancy percent) and how it is arranged on the ground has no ability to enhance or hinder its income potential, or that of adjacent properties?

  2. #277

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    So the arrangement of the physical world holds no inherant value to you? Just, here is a hotel that generates X dollars per year (number of rooms X rate X occupancy percent) and how it is arranged on the ground has no ability to enhance or hinder its income potential, or that of adjacent properties?
    sure it does in general ... just not so much with this site ..

  3. #278

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Wow everyone seems to be jumping off the cliff a bit early with this. I agree it looks terrible but nothing has been approved yet correct? Has the design committee already instructed them to go redesign this?

    I think the main problem is a lot of developers here are locally based and just very new to downtown development. If they are at least open to changes and the design review committee can stay firm and consistent in its requests I can cut them a break, for now anyway.

  4. #279

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    It is true almost all development is coming from locals.

    Because we've had so little quality urban development in the past, those who only know OKC lack perspective and experience.

    That's where these design review committees come in, I just wish they would be tougher. Especially when we have a glut of hotel projects, it's a good time to be more selective and strict.

  5. #280

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Especially when we have a glut of hotel projects, it's a good time to be more selective and strict.
    Exactly- Bricktown can afford to deny any hotel project that isn't meeting or even exceeding standards. There are 1,000 other hotel rooms in the pipeline and this is just a cheap interstate motel. With uncertainty about the hotel market in Bricktown, if a project doesn't make the committee say "Wow, that would be a great addition to the area and we want to see that built" then why bother approving it? Hotel developers shouldn't be able to free-ride off Bricktown's popularity without ponying up to Bricktown's standards.

    This is a lot like the Bricktown McDonald's situation, where the committee was able to say "We have a lot of restaurants here, we don't really need a McDonald's, so unless your design makes us want a McDonald's we're going to deny this."

  6. #281

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    How about everyone on OKCTalk quits their jobs and pools money together to form an LLC and together we will pave the way for a better OKC.

    We obviously have the vision.

  7. #282

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Ironic that this developer referenced McDonald's with his proposal. Because I get the sense that this may be the most scrutinized project since the Bricktown McD's.

  8. #283

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Quote Originally Posted by heyerdahl View Post
    Exactly- Bricktown can afford to deny any hotel project that isn't meeting or even exceeding standards. There are 1,000 other hotel rooms in the pipeline and this is just a cheap interstate motel. With uncertainty about the hotel market in Bricktown, if a project doesn't make the committee say "Wow, that would be a great addition to the area and we want to see that built" then why bother approving it? Hotel developers shouldn't be able to free-ride off Bricktown's popularity without ponying up to Bricktown's standards.

    This is a lot like the Bricktown McDonald's situation, where the committee was able to say "We have a lot of restaurants here, we don't really need a McDonald's, so unless your design makes us want a McDonald's we're going to deny this."
    they don't have to wow the board or exceed the standards .. they have to meet the standards ..

  9. Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    For what it's worth....
    I met with Patel. I listened to him in the meeting. I did not sense in him the same stubborn insistence on moving forward with the "prototype" design after he heard the feedback from the committee. He seemed eager to make changes, to figure out what he needed to do to make it a better fit. I also showed him the photo of the Columbus, S.C. Staybridge shown on this site (I pulled it up on the screen of my laptop after the meeting). He loved it. So again, for what it's worth...

  10. #285

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    How does this (red) occupy any more or different ROW than the proposal (white)?


  11. #286

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve View Post
    For what it's worth....
    I met with Patel. I listened to him in the meeting. I did not sense in him the same stubborn insistence on moving forward with the "prototype" design after he heard the feedback from the committee. He seemed eager to make changes, to figure out what he needed to do to make it a better fit. I also showed him the photo of the Columbus, S.C. Staybridge shown on this site (I pulled it up on the screen of my laptop after the meeting). He loved it. So again, for what it's worth...
    thanks steve that is good to hear

  12. #287

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Did you by chance show him the Holiday Inn Express or Springhill Suites just down the street from that Staybridge? BTW - it is Columbia, SC.

  13. #288

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Thanks Steve.

    Let's hope a good compromise can be struck here.

    Quality and profitability don't have to be mutually exclusive concepts.

  14. Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Just the Facts, the ODOT easement, as I understand it, is marked by the slightly visible pathway that cuts diagonally across the corner just north of the billboard, and starts directly across from the entrance to the gas station.

  15. #290

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve View Post
    Just the Facts, the ODOT easement, as I understand it, is marked by the slightly visible pathway that cuts diagonally across the corner just north of the billboard, and starts directly across from the entrance to the gas station.
    Yes - that is the abandoned railroad right of way. If you go to Google Earth and change the imagery back to Februrary 1995 you can see the railroad cut across this lot, go through where the gas station pumps are now, cross Reno, pass through the Sonic headquarters building, and service whatever business was located where the Harkin Theater now sits. Now some how the gas staton, the City, Randy Hogan, and who knows how many other people were able to build on this easement.

  16. #291

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Easements can be abandoned... Happens all the time.

    However, it takes and time and legal fees to make it happen and perhaps the developer doesn't want to go through the trouble.

  17. Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Yes. But keep in mind; ODOT DOESN'T want to abandon this easement. They are reserving it for future construction of a new ramp.

  18. #293

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    WHat the heck kind of ramp would be contrsucted from that stretch of land? I thought the ramp would be on the deadend portion of Sheridan on the other side of the Interstate, for an on-ramp.

  19. #294

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve View Post
    Yes. But keep in mind; ODOT DOESN'T want to abandon this easement. They are reserving it for future construction of a new ramp.
    Well that is going to be one hell of a right turn getting on the interstate then and not to mention a huge inconvenience of doing it right in the middle of the parking lot of the hotel.

  20. #295
    HangryHippo Guest

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    I have the same question as Anonymous. What in the hell kind of ramp is ODOT considering on this particular easement? I'm very confused on what they could build there because it certainly doesn't seem to work for an off or on ramp...

  21. #296

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Quote Originally Posted by OnlyOne View Post
    I have the same question as Anonymous. What in the hell kind of ramp is ODOT considering on this particular easement? I'm very confused on what they could build there because it certainly doesn't seem to work for an off or on ramp...
    Besides, what would you enter onto - the exit ramp for I-40 west? You can't get on I-235 south from there. The truth is - this is a made up excuse. They need to go sale crazy somewhere else, we're all stocked up here.

  22. #297

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    Besides, what you enter onto - the exit ramp for I-40 west? You can't get on I-235 south from there. The truth is - this is a made up excuse. They need to go sale crazy somewhere else, we're all stocked up here.
    they being ODOT? the fact remains that they have the easement and they want to keep it

  23. Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    Guys, they're calling it a ramp, but it could just as easily be some sort of new fly connection. Whatever it is, ODOT doesn't want to give up that land.

  24. #299

    Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    When was the last time ODOT was asked?

  25. Default Re: Candlewood Suites & Inn (back from the dead!)

    I talked to ODOT about this in 2008. The developer and planning staff indicate they've been given the same info as the project was restarted.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 30 best places to work in Oklahoma
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-21-2008, 12:20 PM
  2. Downtown Sheraton sold to huge hotel developer/operator
    By Pete in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-25-2007, 07:51 AM
  3. New Shuttle Service in Bricktown
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-16-2004, 09:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO