Thread: Liberal Logic

A Liberal and Logic...... LOL

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/minority

Originally Posted by ou48A

A Liberal and Logic...... LOL

Anti-Libs and their reliance on skin tone to decide/define things. LOL[

Whose logic? This was an ultra-right publication's projection of what "liberals" think/believe. That would seem more a reflection of conservative "logic."

Conservative logic is inventing the most outrageous things about what other's think and defining that as "truth?"

Given this rationale, this is a conservative's answer to energy policy:

Is that what abiotic oil looks like? So it's unicorn blood!

The best way to debate is to ridicule. Typical right wing garbage.

Originally Posted by bretthexum

The best way to debate is to ridicule. Typical right wing garbage.

That's hilarious

somehow, it just seems appropriate - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umrp1tIBY8Q

Originally Posted by Edmond_Outsider

Whose logic? This was an ultra-right publication's projection of what "liberals" think/believe. That would seem more a reflection of conservative "logic."

Conservative logic is inventing the most outrageous things about what other's think and defining that as "truth?"

Given this rationale, this is a conservative's answer to energy policy:

Anyone on a unicorn dressed in orange flashing the Longhorn hand sign has got to be a liberal.
In fact whoever came up with the image of what a liberal looks like did very well.

Unicorn? Please....

Originally Posted by ou48A

Anyone on a unicorn dressed in orange flashing the Longhorn hand sign has got to be a liberal.
In fact whoever came up with the image of what a liberal looks like did very well.

Can't you see the picture? That's a quadricorn.

Neocons can't even count to 4.

Insults - an excellent way to gain the upper hand without actually providing any meaningful insight. I propose a K-12 subforum for the Politics section.

Originally Posted by White Peacock

Insults - an excellent way to gain the upper hand without actually providing any meaningful insight. I propose a K-12 subforum for the Politics section.

Sanctimonious BS] - an excellent way to gain the upper hand without actually providing any meaningful insight. I propose a K-12 subforum for the Politics section.

I was referring to the OP, whose greatest contribution to the political dialogue is copying/pasting arm-length articles and creating threads for no better reason than to insult his ideological opponents, then subsequently adds these opponents to what he refers to as his liberal ignore list (I supposedly have the honor of being amongst these ranks). This contributes absolute jack **** to the greater conversation and sets up a meaningless circle jerk; ya dig?

Originally Posted by White Peacock

Insults - an excellent way to gain the upper hand without actually providing any meaningful insight. I propose a K-12 subforum for the Politics section.

Originally Posted by Midtowner

Sanctimonious BS] - an excellent way to gain the upper hand without actually providing any meaningful insight. I propose a K-12 subforum for the Politics section.

Originally Posted by White Peacock

I was referring to the OP, whose greatest contribution to the political dialogue is copying/pasting arm-length articles and creating threads for no better reason than to insult his ideological opponents, then subsequently adds these opponents to what he refers to as his liberal ignore list (I supposedly have the honor of being amongst these ranks). This contributes absolute jack **** to the greater conversation and sets up a meaningless circle jerk; ya dig?

LOL, funny how that can be taken both ways, huh? Wouldn't it be better to let these sorts of threads die on the vine instead of feeding it with similar responses? Or is it a case where if you don't complain about the complainer, you imply agreement?

Originally Posted by MadMonk

LOL, funny how that can be taken both ways, huh? Wouldn't it be better to let these sorts of threads die on the vine instead of feeding it with similar responses? Or is it a case where if you don't complain about the complainer, you imply agreement?

You should know by now that Liberals will never understand what you are saying, but I will join you in LOL at them.

Originally Posted by MadMonk

LOL, funny how that can be taken both ways, huh? Wouldn't it be better to let these sorts of threads die on the vine instead of feeding it with similar responses? Or is it a case where if you don't complain about the complainer, you imply agreement?

Just another troll thread...

It would be good if vbulletin gave the user the option to hide threads created by trolls instead of having them clutter up the place.

Trolls and windmills are a recipe for disaster--Al "The UberLib" Gore

Originally Posted by Double Edge

Just another troll thread...

It would be good if vbulletin gave the user the option to hide threads created by trolls instead of having them clutter up the place.

Tsk tsk. Calling names is not a very adult thing to do. Besides, if that sort of thing existed, this section would turn into a very boring echo chamber.

Liberal Logic.

Oxymoron.

How can a group who would more readily shout "God did it" in lieu of scientific inquiry ridicule anybody else's logical capacity?

Originally Posted by White Peacock

How can a group who would more readily shout "God did it" in lieu of scientific inquiry ridicule anybody else's logical capacity?

Because for them faith trumps logic unless it suits their agenda?

Originally Posted by Lord Helmet

Because for them faith trumps logic unless it suits their agenda?

It's worse than that: for them, faith is logical and always trumps the empirical. Doesn't make sense? God did it, and any alternate explanation is part of a greater liberal agenda to destroy Christianity.

One must wonder, what "gift" those who claim to "know" what motivates others, provides them with this knowledge.