Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

  1. #1
    Midtowner's Avatar
    Midtowner is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Total Posts
    12,942

    Default 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    STATE OF OKLAHOMA

    2nd Session of the 53rd Legislature (2012)

    SENATE BILL 1418 By: Shortey

    AS INTRODUCED

    An Act relating to food; prohibiting the manufacture or sale of food or products which use aborted human fetuses; providing for codification; and providing an effective date.

    BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
    SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1-1150 of Title 63, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
    No person or entity shall manufacture or knowingly sell food or any other product intended for human consumption which contains aborted human fetuses in the ingredients or which used aborted human fetuses in the research or development of any of the ingredients.
    SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2012.

    53-2-3065 JM 1/19/2012 12:43:02 PM
    You cannot make this stuff up folks.

  2. #2
    Jersey Boss's Avatar
    Jersey Boss is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Total Posts
    1,682

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 148 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Is this at the ONION website?

  3. #3
    Midtowner's Avatar
    Midtowner is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Total Posts
    12,942

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 148 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    No, this is for real.

  4. #4
    venture79's Avatar
    venture79 is offline VIP Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Total Posts
    9,319

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 148 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Literally this seems...strange. I don't really see restaurants setting up that are offering steak and fetuses on their menu. LOL However, I'm wondering what the real motives behind this would be. Perhaps stem cell research is considered "consuming" if the end product is injected in a human. Not sure. On the surface if someone votes against it people are going to be like "OMG, You want to allow people to eat fetuses!" So it is one of those that would be passed regardless.
    @wxspotlight |Chat www.weatherspotlight.com/?page_id=40 | facebook.com/WeatherSpotlight

  5. #5
    mmm
    mmm is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Total Posts
    3,769

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 148 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    from my cold, dead hands. -M

    /edit: fixed the thread title to 1418 after finding the bill on www.oklegislature.gov

  6. #6
    Midtowner's Avatar
    Midtowner is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Total Posts
    12,942

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 148 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Quote Originally Posted by venture79 View Post
    Literally this seems...strange. I don't really see restaurants setting up that are offering steak and fetuses on their menu. LOL However, I'm wondering what the real motives behind this would be. Perhaps stem cell research is considered "consuming" if the end product is injected in a human. Not sure. On the surface if someone votes against it people are going to be like "OMG, You want to allow people to eat fetuses!" So it is one of those that would be passed regardless.
    Yeah, I suppose you could prosecute anyone receiving a stem cell transplant under this bill. That'd certainly be "human consumption." Perhaps this is an attempt to cover a far reaching law under a guise making it appear to be ridiculous and innocuous?

  7. #7
    mmm
    mmm is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Total Posts
    3,769

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    hmmm... interesting theory. i think you guys are on to something. the bill's short title is:

    Quote Originally Posted by oklegislature
    Food; prohibiting the sale or manufacture of food or products which contain aborted human fetuses.
    depending on the source, stem cell treatments could fall under a 'product that contains aborted human fetuses.'

    -M

  8. #8
    HewenttoJared is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Total Posts
    11,113

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    This could have far-reaching consequences for the medical industry if interpreted by the wrong person.

  9. #9
    Midtowner's Avatar
    Midtowner is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Total Posts
    12,942

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Quote Originally Posted by mmm View Post
    hmmm... interesting theory. i think you guys are on to something. the bill's short title is:



    depending on the source, stem cell treatments could fall under a 'product that contains aborted human fetuses.'

    -M
    There's a good argument that to that end it'd be void for vagueness.

  10. #10
    Uncle Slayton is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Total Posts
    370

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot??

  11. #11
    kevinpate's Avatar
    kevinpate is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Total Posts
    9,405

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Slayton View Post
    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot??
    The majority of voters, a vast majority at that, elected a bunch of far, far right social conservatives. None of the pet projects of the far right social conservatives should be even remotely surprising to anyone who has been paying attention over the last thirty odd months.

    And wowsers, some of them have indeed been a bit odd. However, if the trend continues, please do not be surprised if the goals of the social conservatives expand into still further arenas.

  12. #12
    Uncle Slayton is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Total Posts
    370

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Quote Originally Posted by kevinpate View Post
    The majority of voters, a vast majority at that, elected a bunch of far, far right social conservatives. None of the pet projects of the far right social conservatives should be even remotely surprising to anyone who has been paying attention over the last thirty odd months.

    And wowsers, some of them have indeed been a bit odd. However, if the trend continues, please do not be surprised if the goals of the social conservatives expand into still further arenas.
    This stupid, p*ss-ignorant state. I don't even understand the purpose of such a bill.

  13. #13
    Bunty's Avatar
    Bunty is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Total Posts
    7,202

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Slayton View Post
    This stupid, p*ss-ignorant state. I don't even understand the purpose of such a bill.
    It has to do with the belief that life begins at the moment of conception. It will be interesting to see if Republicans will want Oklahomans to vote in favor of giving personhood to the fetus. If it were to pass it would just mean more legal bills for the taxpayer to fight a court challenge of it.

  14. #14
    TheTravellers is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Total Posts
    424

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Apparently there is suspicion that there are fetal stem cells involved, but not in the actual products:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/032043_hu...l_flavors.html

    Article says "allegedly"...
    Last edited by TheTravellers; 01-26-2012 at 12:42 PM. Reason: Clarification

  15. #15
    TaoMaas's Avatar
    TaoMaas is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Total Posts
    1,728

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Quote Originally Posted by kevinpate View Post
    The majority of voters, a vast majority at that, elected a bunch of far, far right social conservatives. None of the pet projects of the far right social conservatives should be even remotely surprising to anyone who has been paying attention over the last thirty odd months.

    And wowsers, some of them have indeed been a bit odd. However, if the trend continues, please do not be surprised if the goals of the social conservatives expand into still further arenas.

    Very true...this group is much different than Republicans of the past...a lot scarier.

  16. #16
    adaniel is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Total Posts
    1,305

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    On a related note, what is going on in the SW Quadrant of the metro that is making people vote for these bats**t crazy politicans? (Mr. Shortey represents a big chunck of the Inner Southside) I'm being very serious....

    Randy Terrill, Mike Reynolds, Mike Christian, and now this gentleman. Its like a who's who of nutties at the state capitol. Plus, there was David "I love my machine guns" Walters on the OKC city council.

  17. #17
    bretthexum is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Total Posts
    1,979

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Just when I thought I couldn't read something more ridiculous... I find this thread.

  18. #18
    Bunty's Avatar
    Bunty is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Total Posts
    7,202

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Quote Originally Posted by bretthexum View Post
    Just when I thought I couldn't read something more ridiculous... I find this thread.
    I went to a town hall meeting that featured three Oklahoma state legislators, and they were actually questioned as to how they felt about this fetus bill with the questioner adding that it was making Oklahoma look crazy. All three legislators acted like it was just the height of ridiculousness and did not have one single word to say about it.

  19. #19
    venture79's Avatar
    venture79 is offline VIP Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Total Posts
    9,319

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    They really need to do a better job of shutting down the nut bags getting elected by a few extremist districts. However the local media doesn't help. These people come up with this crazy bills to get air time on TV and then they can turn around and tell their district how hard they are working.
    @wxspotlight |Chat www.weatherspotlight.com/?page_id=40 | facebook.com/WeatherSpotlight

  20. #20
    Uncle Slayton is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Total Posts
    370

    Default Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1418 An act prohibiting the consumption of human fetuses

    Quote Originally Posted by Bunty View Post
    It has to do with the belief that life begins at the moment of conception. It will be interesting to see if Republicans will want Oklahomans to vote in favor of giving personhood to the fetus. If it were to pass it would just mean more legal bills for the taxpayer to fight a court challenge of it.
    Never mind that? Everyone knows that if you let 'em mature too much, they just dry out and get tough when ya grill 'em. Even with all the extra spell-casting and demon summoning, you just can't make them come out tasty once they get past three or four months.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-25-2011, 07:54 AM
  2. Replies: 290
    Last Post: 04-22-2011, 02:50 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-20-2011, 02:30 PM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-24-2010, 07:22 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-08-2010, 12:33 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1