![]() |
|
|||||||
| Political Arena Anything related to the political scene. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
No one wants to be the next Arthur Anderson.
__________________
It's a friendlier OKCTalk! |
|
||||
|
Theory on the early Socialist leaning of our home state.
(failed socialist as it has everywhere) Could it be that this state was socialist leaning due to the fact free government land was given to mostly anglo settlers. All they had to do was run out there and drive a stake in the ground. Yet that Government handout also displaced the native of native America. That socialist experiment was not very fair if you were a native American. Big government making Big Pioneers even richer. just a thought. Respond before you react. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Frankly, I wrote the, "note to myself," because I am shocked. I am rarely shocked anymore. It's all about capital here. Nobody mentions labor. Yet, labor creates all wealth. But, the suits win again and pass along the profits to those who did no work at all. I'm worn out. For the first time ever, I am wondering if I have made a mistake staying here. In reality, I could work anywhere. Maybe Pete, Kerry, Hot Rod, East Coast Okie, on and on and on... have all done the right thing - and left. I started out in partisan politics and working in state government in the late seventies. I was part of, what I consider, some pretty good fights. I stayed active in politics with my new (real) career and became involved with organized labor through my labor union, where I've held a card for a better part of the last thirty years as a member of the Writers Guild of America (west). I mostly just did my job, but was active when I needed to be in the WGA(w). Later, I became very involved. I have seen greed close-up in the last year when our union shut down the keyboards as major studios wanted to negotiate a contract that gave us paltry sums for DVD sales and New Media downloadable content. We brought a good part of what you see on TV and the movies to a halt. For the first time, a lot of people understood that it's not just the big studios, the names in lights, the mega-salaries of late night comedy that made broadcast news & entertainment happen in this country. It took people like me. People who sit in solitude and write and write and write and keep on writing. The content keeps on flowing and nothing changes. We take it all for granted. But then, you go awhile without the lowly writer and look what happens. Greed brought the bosses to a standstill with our union as we spoke with one voice. Together, as an organized labor union, we had a voice. As individuals - we would have had to accept what was offered or they would move on and let the writers in India or beginners do the writing. We wanted our share. In every industry LABOR wants their share. By the way, for the most part --- we won! But the fight for workers everywhere goes on. Wal-Mart workers, for example, desperately need a labor union. Midtowner, You said it as well as anybody: "Capitalism is greed, ambition, all that good stuff..." I dream of a better world. ![]()
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Congratulations. Capitalism and greed work! Good for you. You think that labor unions work outside of capitalism and greed? Nope. They're part of the machine.
__________________
It's a friendlier OKCTalk! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Solitude,
never give up you dream for a better world. I certainly don't. We may have different ideas of what that world may look like, however in the end we are Americans. The hope of the world. A group of people who have made terrible mistakes, yet provide the best hope for a better life. The fact that we can disagree over things that in the end are not life and death is beautiful. You are pro union I no longer am. I believe at one time they were very much needed. I think for the most part they have outlived their usefulness. Today I see Union bosses living large while the ones they represent struggling. They have become what they fight. Keep you chin up, we like your posts. may not agree but they make you think. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
You know solitude, I am really sick of seeing your statement "labor creates wealth." You act as though the only people adding value to this society are those who are smashing bricks in the court yard. The fact of the matter is that all of us work hard in our own ways, whether that is doing a manual job, a white collar job, or yes even managing a project or a business. Quite frankly it is arrogant and down-right disrespectful of you to assume that there are "laborers" and then "everyone else" who doesn't do jack but set around and soak up money and plot how they're going to screw everyone else some more. This line of reasoning is easily dismissable and is not helping your cause.
|
|
|||
|
And another thing, you can smash bricks in a courtyard or plunk out text on a type writer all day long, but unless you have smart people who can figure out something people actually want to buy, and unless you have rich people who can invest in you for those months and months while your project is in development and not making any money then your labor is fruitless. Labor alone absolutely does not create wealth. If that were the case there'd be an awful lot of rich tinkerers out there.
|
|
|||
|
I'd like to also know if you think that the nice folks on the west coast who saw double-digit gains in their home's appreciation over the last several years should also be subjected to a windfall profits tax? Many of them, even with recent declines, made hundreds of thousands of dollars off the sale of their homes and no "labor" was involved. I'm just curious if you are consistent or not... if the face of who you are taxing influences whether or not you would actually want to tax them or not.
|
|
|||
|
It's basic economics, dismayed. In the beginning, with every dime, somebody labored. That doesn't mean just "smashing bricks," and other so-called "blue-collar" jobs. I mean the white collar insurance adjuster, the woman at the receptionist desk for a construction company, anybody who receives a paycheck without exploiting labor themselves.
Money makes money, yes. However, the money that is used to make more money was created by somebody doing something. Disrespectful? I'm talking about the vast masses. Who am I being disrespectful to? The masters of these wage slaves? Well, so be it. They are, in most cases, using tax advantages created by their powerful political friends, corporate welfare, etc, to make their mountains of cash. I have no pity or a need to respect getting rich off the work of others. I disagree with that in a fundamental way. So we're not going to agree. You sound like a shill for capital when you question my "labor creates all wealth" line. They would like you to believe it's not true. The fact is - it's absolutely true. Remember, money to make money, that makes more money, that makes even more money --- came from somewhere. The infancy of all wealth was labor. Period. Maybe it was yourself in your own business - great! But when you take the business to new levels and allow yourself to get richer and richer when your employees go home with no health insurance and piddly wages (so you can move up from Quail Creek to the McMansions of Edmond to Gallardia) - all on the backs of poorly paid workers --- that's wrong. We'll agree to disagree. Disagreeing. That is still allowed in George Bush's America? I haven't checked the news today, I may be wrong. |
|
||||
|
Oh solitude you were doing so good until you hit on President Bush.
That is where so many mess up. When there is nothing left to offer ...oh yeah it's george bush... I am not defending the President, just can't blame him on every case, as you can't blame a democrat for everything. Never heard if you would sell me car for 250k? Or my joke if writing a picket sign is crossing union line? did you post anything while on strike? and is that a conflict? Seriously though were you financially hurt by the strike? How about the union bosses? So many "workers" have become slaves to the BIG Unions. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
One final comment, because often I like your posts, is that your viewpoint here is no better than the extremely conservative people you often complain about on this board. I don't agree with you and suddenly I'm working for an oil company, raping the little guy of all his money and benefits, and palling around with George Bush. Life has a lot of shades of gray to it. Your posts don't seem to reflect that reality lately... which to me basically means your thoughts have no basis in reality. If you're trying to win people over to your point of you, I assure you that you are doing the opposite. Congratulations you've just become the Bush International Strategy of our message board. |
|
||||
|
I'm not going to talk politics in this post. I'm going to respond to the post from dismayed above.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
More than anything, after reading your first few lines, I know you have a very distorted view of my life, my job, etc. I'm just a normal guy. Really! No horns, people say I smile a lot, I love life, my family, my city - and I even love this little message board where I feel I know so many of you. I live inside those shades of grey all day - every day. To me, ones views on economics does not a person make. I don't feel that way about you or anybody else here. I hope my economic views do not color your perception of me as a person; I'm really not anything like what you seem to be thinking about me. Have a good weekend. |
|
||||
|
Solitude
Would be curious your thought on thesis connecting the Oklahoma Land run and early Socialist leanings of the SOONER state. Above post, up there somewhere. Actually wrote a paper on it in college. Made a very good grade, drove the professor crazy personally at least he said it made him think. "And as much as he hated to admit it I may have something there." |
|
||||
|
Native -- if you want to see how little the early Oklahomans trusted the government or Corporations, just read the Oklahoma Constitution. It's probably one of, if not the most "power to the people" state Constitutions out there. For example, it requires a popular vote to approve every tax hike (which is why our taxes are so low). It set up the Corporation Commission, which was supposed to keep big monopolistic utility providers from overcharging the people (they didn't foresee that a big company like Chesepeake might come along the pike and start offering excellent jobs to the more compliant commissioners though).
-- at any rate, it's good stuff.
__________________
It's a friendlier OKCTalk! |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Obama and Taxes | Karried | Political Arena | 57 | 08-16-2008 12:46 AM |
| Sales Tax Rates - NOT insignificant | solitude | OKC Metro Area Talk | 24 | 03-02-2008 03:42 PM |
| The Ballot, Ordinance, & Your Vote | Doug Loudenback | OKC Metro Area Talk | 54 | 01-13-2008 07:55 AM |
| Bush Commutes Libby's Sentence | Lauri101 | Political Arena | 24 | 07-05-2007 10:37 PM |
| Tax Time Tips | Lauri101 | Money Matters | 3 | 04-05-2007 03:24 AM |