![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I would be surprised if this wasn't a success in sales and in also injected some life in to the neighborhood. |
|
||||
|
If these sell quickly -- and I bet they do -- it's likely to kick off a whole new round of residential development at the lower price ranges.
The cool thing is that we now have a whole range of products, which not only gives buyers some real choice but also allows the market to be tested to see where the most demand may be. Will also make it easier for future developments to get financing. |
|
|||
|
We've had renderings of these on OkMet for a while. They've been under "2nd and Oklahoma Lofts," I think, if you're interested in seeing some earlier renderings. We will have to update the title to Lofts@Maywood.
|
|
|||
|
shane, quit stooping so low and promoting your site on a competitors site. because of you and Spartan doing such, I won't visit your site.
kim, i figured that this is what you have been waiting for them to announce however you couldn't say anything. I knew it was coming for about a year know, just hadn't seen the renderings. McDermid and Garrett have been talking about it for quite some while and have told me about it. Glad to see it finally be announced. And all! NOTICE HOW FAST they are starting (In May) and completing the project. Not like the Good Old Boy project Overholser Green that will be built in 4 phases over 4 years and most likely not even start construction until sometime next year!! Glad to see quality developers building quality projects and not tying up public tax money for 4 years that won't even benefit the public. At least this private project has a retail element. |
|
|||
|
Sorry, there is the post from Patrick on our forum telling everyone to check out OKCTalk, and that we were working together to spark conversation about Oklahoma. I figured it had become a mutual relationship. I misunderstood. I'll refrain from posting relevant references in the future. And OkcTalk can refrain from plagiarizing OkMet. I guess.
|
|
||||
|
Free boards competing for what? We all enjoy talking about the progress in OKC. I hate to break it to you, both boards are made up of the same people. I read both everyday.
It is cool to see the momentum pick up in the Triangle. Thanks to all the "insiders" that have continued to feed the mass of OKC fanatics that read this board. I look forward to watching the progress in OKC. |
|
||||
|
Oh good God. I should announce that me and Patrick have a tentative affiliation agreement underway. Take that and shove it metro.
Besides rumors I break on my site sometimes wind their way on here same as rumors broken on here wind their way over there, why not give credit? Shane has over 100 posts on here and I have almost a thousand ... again. We both have more posts here than OKC Talk admin, or even members, combined, including members like wsucougz and bombermwc that mostly spend their time at Met. But my point is why can't we all just get along? Every time you, metro, bring this up to smear Shane or I is just awful considering I don't even know what I did to you. So that said can me and Shane go back to posting like normal on here, or do we need to keep addressing this?
__________________
Keep away from Miss Margarita Mean... Last edited by Karried; 04-01-2007 at 08:46 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think that the Brownstones at Maywood Park will be the one to inject life into the area, as those will be finished soon, this hasn't broken ground yet. Also there is Central Park Villas, Block 42, and others. The Brownstones is supposed to have almost 100 separate brownstones when finished.
__________________
Keep away from Miss Margarita Mean... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
" You've Been Thunder Struck ! " |
|
|||
|
FWIW.
metro, if you have a problem with another member's post, please report it using the red icon at the top of the post. In regards to okmet, I offered to trade links with them. I think both sites are important and useful in different ways. Ours focuses more on providing residents of OKC a place to come and talk about issues. They focus more on the state. Needless to say, I did make a post over there advertising our site, but that was done, more to see how willing they would be to join us in sharing links. I've been trying to take the high road here, as Doug has suggested in the past. |
|
||||
|
Both me and Patrick, or at least myself, have been under pressure from other members too to keep it classy. It just looks ugly when this feud used to rear its ugly head and now that we're no longer doing that crap I am so glad.
That's why I find the return of the feud so despicable and offensive.
__________________
Keep away from Miss Margarita Mean... |
|
|||
|
In my defense I wasn't the only one suggesting about competitor's tactics. In fact I was far from the first. I'm usually just the one that gets the blunt of it, but that's ok.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
They said they were offering units "as small as" 1500 square feet. The use of the phrase "as small as" suggests that 1500 square feet estimate is probably at the lower end of the sizing. They listed the started asking price as $126,000. So, I took the low end price and combined it with the low end square footage, and deduced in my original post that "the 1500 units will be around the 126-150 range." Granted, there is some reading between the lines there, but I was just trying to say that seems like a good price range for that size given the location and the amenities included. I will try and remeber to label my figures completely in the future (my high school physics teacher would be very frustrated). Sorry for the confusion. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
I could have sworn I saw somewhere the description of a "studio" at around this price. Am I thinking of something else? 1500 sq. ft. is obviously larger than a "studio." $126,000 would be an awful lot for a studio apartment. Am I thinking of another project? I was certain it was this - but now after reading the thread again, I'm not so sure. I guess the good news is that there are so many developments, we can't keep track of what is what. Who would have thought?
------------ |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bell's Amusement Park to close | Patrick | Tulsa | 10 | 06-06-2008 11:27 PM |
| The Forest Park SCAM mut stop NOW! | Sojourner7 | Oklahoma Law | 21 | 10-25-2006 04:21 PM |
| Presby Research Park outlines future plans | Pete Brzycki | OKC Metro Area Talk | 2 | 05-22-2006 03:51 PM |