![]() |
|
||||
|
This is how I see it. Funk will talk to the Sonic people and see if they are really interested in bring them to OKC. If after that meeting, Funk still tries to bring the Penguins here then we know the Sonics are iffy on relocation. If Funk move on an effort to take the team to Tulsa then the Sonics will be here in 2 years.
|
|
||||
|
That would be weird tho, if Tulsa got the NHL
and OKC was left with the Blazers AAA. I say, OKC step up to the plate and get the NBA Sonics/Storm AND NHL!!! Maybe some of the NHL and WNBA Storm games could be played in Tulsa - and Tulsa would be the obvious D-league and Hockey farm for OKC's teams. But OKC needs to be the major league market!
__________________
Oklahoma City, RENAISSANCE CITY! |
|
|||
|
Either way I think it's funny that the title of this thread is NHL to Tulsa when the article and the NHL has officially stated OKC as a potential market and only Bob Funk speculated he could move an NHL team to Tulsa. I don't see it happening, Kansas City clearly has the advantage then maybe OKC. If KC lands the NHL, the will be out of NBA competition and we will definitely land the next NBA team.
|
|
||||
|
We are ahead of Kansas City for the NBA and KC is ahead of us for the NHL.
I agree, KC will get the Penguins but it is nice to see that OKC is a major league market worth considering. Heck, we even look after our little sister - Tulsa. wish they'd ever look after OKC or at least say something nice.
__________________
Oklahoma City, RENAISSANCE CITY! |
|
|||
|
I think OKC's leaders have to tread very carefully on this, because OKC could support one pro franchise, but I think two is a stretch. I surely hope that we throw the bulk of our efforts behind the NBA, and not so much the NHL. Despite the Blazers' success, I'm not convinced that would translate into the same success at the full NHL level.
I'm going to keep my fingers crossed that the NBA is, somehow, going to happen. -SoonerDave |
|
||||
|
Definitely at this point, NBA is number one for us. I dont think anyone would question this.
The ONLY league who could come close to competing with the NBA in Oklahoma City would be if the NFL expanded - giving LA a franchise and another city or two. In this case, I would think and hope that the state would go after NFL first then NBA since NFL is such a top league. Of the leagues, I would rank them as follows: 1) NFL 2) MLB 2) NBA 4) NHL 5) MLS 6) AFL So given the NFL is not expanding and OU would probably have a fit if we tried to host the team there (and that we dont have an NFL stadium yet) - NBA is our best choice. But I think we could also support NHL - ESPECIALLY if we do it like this: 1) OKC's NBA team has exclusivity at the Ford Center, meaning it has first slot with overriding rights to game nights. 2) OKC's NHL team would have second choice at Ford, whenever the NBA is playing - the team could have home games at the Cox, Fairgrounds, or Tulsa. The NBA team could also play preseason games at Tulsa, Wichita/Topeka, Little Rock, Albuquerque, Amarillo, and "dare I say" Ft. Worth - all close regional cities without teams where we could establish a fan base. Ditto with the NHL team and the WNBA, and then you have a fan base of some 5M people to support the teams. I think it could be done and should be a requirement of any and all major league teams that land here - that they would do preseason (maybe even a season home game) in a regional city or two. I think by sharing our team a little bit, other cities will support us - which will not only ensure the success of the team and the city but also ensure success of our supporting more than one team. So, to review - I think NBA is number one unless the NFL has a change of heart. Even then, I would hope the NBA makes it here first (permanently) irregardless. I think we could support another team provided we market to the region as well - be it NHL, AFL, or MLS. I think MLB is out - as we are not a market (nor do I think we want to be). MLS would require a stadium, so I think we are limited to NBA, NHL, and AFL right now. If done right and creatively - we could support all three.
__________________
Oklahoma City, RENAISSANCE CITY! |
|
|||
|
Why would we want the NBA team to play a preseason game in Fort Worth since they have a very close neighbor with its own NBA team?
As much as I love the NHL, I don't think it will survive here like an NBA franchise or with an NBA franchise. No NHL team will want to play in Cox or at the Fairgrounds. They are looking for a first-class facility, which is why the Penguins are leaving Pittsburgh. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
As far as the NHL here? I am openminded. If we get them, and still get the Sonics, then who knows. It is the same as the nay sayers saying NO major league team could make it here... And we know who got the last laugh on that one.
|
|
|||
|
Well, if not for Katrina, no team would have considered OKC. Unfortunately, we'd been turned down multiple times until that event forced them here. Hey, it's nice that OKC is now a contender to get a team in the future, but without Katrina we'd still be years away from real consideration, given the competition. I don't want to take anything away from the deal makers who made it happen, but everyone knows that without Katrina, OKC is not considered a top major league site. It'd actually be kind of gross to claim otherwise. Thankfully, most of those who were involved have been gracious enough to acknowledge the circumstances.
The reality is: no Katrina, then no major league sports for OKC and, after this year, there still may not be any. So, anyone who claims it would have happened without it is blowing smoke or struggling with reality. |
|
|||
|
The entire concept of having the National Hockey League in Oklahoma is completely obsurd.
Simply put, NHL hockey in either Oklahoma City or Tulsa will not work. If anything, it would come for a few years, suffer in attendance, and end up hurting both cities in the long run. ANd this isn't the first time buy any means that we have heard this 'NHL to Oklahoma City' crap. Remember the Calgary Flames ploy to sale more season tickets by threatening to move to Oklahoma City? Remember the NHL expansion silliness and claiming we came in just behind Columbus? Yeah, right. I used to be good friends with the Norick's during the time he was trying to lure the Winnipeg Jets to Oklahoma. He swore he could pull it off. Bless his heart, he tried. But who honestly thought they would choose Indian Territory over Phoenix? Speaking of Winnipeg, the Penguins need to be north of the border. After building their new arena....I can't see why they aren't still in the running for this team. |
|
|||
|
NHL in Oklahoma just isn't smart. And the last time the NHL considered OKC, they didn't think the Ford Center was big enough for them...so tell me how the BOK center would be any better since its smaller. We're all the way down here in Oklahoma....you need a much bigger city this far south to support NHL because people don't grow up playing Hockey here like they do up north...meaning people aren't as interested in it. A smaller city up north can handle it because everyone is so enthused, but here, we're lucky to ever get close to being full for a Blazer's game....and I don't think that just beacuse it's NHL, people will all of a sudden become hockey fans like they did for NBA. We all grow up playing some basketball so we're more into it.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Throughout the 90's, they consistantly had 10,000 +....reason for the relocation talk in the first place. I would imagine the attendance would greatly improve if you had the Montreal Canadiens and New York Rangers coming to town rather than the Odessa Jackalopes. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
So much to respond to - so little time.
If someone thinks Katrina was the only reason the Hornets came here then let me say this - 9/11 is the only reason the Hornets went to NO in the first place. George Shinn was supposed to visit OKC on the afternoon of 9/11 after touring NO. Since the airlines were grounded he couldn't make the trip to OKC and settled on NO. Tulsa can't support the NBA - funny I'll bet you guys said the same about OKC and the NBA. KC is the lead for NHL - huh? Expressing interest first does not put you in the lead. OKC has three things KC does not have. A successful minor league team, no Chiefs, no Royals. For some reason many people equate cost with quality. ESPn said the arena in KC cost $230 million. So what, they financed it. Of course it is going to cost more. OKC paid cash. this makes it cheaper with debt to service. This leads to lower ticket prices and higher player salaries. |
|
|||
|
Kerry, you make some good points but I have to agree with the person who said KC is in the front running for the NHL, they want it and are agressively seeking it and my money would be on that they will get the Penguins if they move. The NBA has said we are on the top of the list for expansion or relocation. The NHL only mentioned we are one of 5 contenders, several of which experts and NHL officials have said we're not the frontrunner. We're not as actively seeking them as we are the NBA, the NBA is the league we want FIRST, do we want NHL down the road if it is possibly feasible to support it? Absolutely. But we're taking a more passive approach with the NHL right now.
|
|
||||
|
Don't get me wrong METRO - my first choice would be NBA. I would actually prefer MLS over NHL but I think the NHL in Tulsa would be a viable possibility. Tulsa has a metro approaching 1,000,000. Of course, if Funk is succesful in bringing the NHL to Tulsa you can say good-bye to the Blazers. This would be good for the NHL and the NBA.
|
|
||||
|
Funk backs off of interest in Penguins
By Bob Hersom Staff Writer Express Sports' bid to buy the NHL's Pittsburgh Penguins has at the least been put on a back burner, and probably off the stove. Express personnel are no longer expecting Penguins officials to visit Oklahoma City. A visit had been hoped for this week. "Due to the Hornets' success, the city is in a situation where they may land a permanent NBA franchise in the next one to three years," said Brad Lund, CEO of Express Sports. "So, we as an ownership group are not able to proceed in a dollars and cents manner, such as lease terms and revenue streams." The Penguins, who are seeking new ownership and a new arena in Pittsburgh, are also considering an offer from Kansas City that includes free rent on that city's arena, scheduled to open this fall. "The Penguins have made it clear that they're on a 30 to 60 day timetable," Lund said, "and the city isn't in a situation where we can compete aggressively the way the state of Pennsylvania is in keeping the Penguins and the way Kansas City is in trying to lure an NHL tenant for the fall. "But is the story dead? No. We're going to continue lines of communication open on a daily basis. Things may change." |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Tulsa Mayor? | Patrick | Tulsa | 1 | 01-10-2006 04:29 PM |
| Tulsa Airport defaults loan | metro | Tulsa | 1 | 11-29-2005 12:36 PM |
| More lofts coming to Tulsa | Patrick | Tulsa | 0 | 11-19-2005 01:12 PM |
| Great Plains costing Tulsa big bucks | Patrick | Oklahoma BusinesseXchange | 6 | 11-02-2005 12:57 PM |
| Tulsa State Fair vs. Oklahoma State Fair | Patrick | OKC Metro Area Talk | 2 | 10-05-2004 01:26 PM |