|
|||||||
| OKC Metro Area Talk Discuss development and civic issues here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Agreed. For Moore/ SW OKC to get hit by 2 tornadoes, and not only gain back most of those displaced residents, but to grow at almost 3 times the national average, it must be doing something right.
But I do wonder if that area has any good paying jobs. Those houses aren't cheap over there. I watched the video report on newsok.com and it said most people either commute to Norman or OKC for their jobs. Does anyone know what the big employers are in that area? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
My dad was not only a member, but an officer of the SOCCOC in the 60's and 70's. He did not renew his membership because of the COC being a social club. I can not name one single business that was brought here as a direct result of the COC. Yes. The southside is expanding, and doing so faster than I remember it ever doing so. However, I know enough about the COC to know it is not them. |
|
||||
|
The area sells itself -- that's why it's been successful. It has generous landscaping (at least south of 74th), high incomes, new housing developments, and good schools. OKC is keeping pace with the South Lakes Park and the anticipated YMCA.
But I am disappointed in the businesses. That 240 Penn Park will not be adding anything new (were people really going to the northside for Sally's Beauty Supply?) Nothing to make northsiders come down south. My only hope is that the quality of the development is attractive if not excellent. And the location of some of the businesses along I-240 just does not seem right - Joe's Crab Shack on the edge of a shabby strip mall parking lot? - and right next to it a new standalone Starbucks? At least add some of the landscaping I mentioned earlier. It seems as if all the attention to detail and quality on the south side is concentrated on the far end. I-240 seems to be just another messy land grab. So I bid good luck on the bookstore. I know they are targeting the former Wal-Mart site. Hopefully, it will be developed with much more care than the other two newcomers. And here's hoping the Palagio does its name justice and brings in unique high-end services, retailers, and shops. We'll see what they bring in after Marble Slab.
__________________
Continue the Renaissance |
|
||||
|
Trust me. That parking lot in that strip center you call "shabby" is in better shape than most. Try dodging the cracks and potholes in the Office Depot lot.
The new strip center will have a minimum of one business new to the market... Marshall's. The only reason PetSmart, and Michael's are moving are so they can design their own space. PetSmart may want to open their doggie daycare center there, and Michael's in their current location is WAY to small. Mardel's is moving because their building is in the way of the new strip center. The other new business to the south side is Ross Dress for Less. (Lord. Another junk clothing retailer). By the way. The YMCA is not "anticipated." It is under construction. |
|
|||
|
Just imagine how much more growth would happen if something great would become of Crossroads Mall. If the mall took on the same direction that Penn Square and Quail Springs have, there would be more retail being built around the mall. It'll be interesting to see what the new interchange will do for growth around the mall area. As for new employers to the southside in the future, my bet is on America West.
|
|
||||
|
Mranderson, thanks for some of the clarification. But Starbucks and Joe's do not fit well there, in my aesthetic opinion. So 240 Penn is still mostly a relocation of current businesses. The hope now is that it looks good. As for the YMCA, "anticipated" may have been a poor choice of words, but I meant no doubt. I took "anticipated" to mean "expect" (to open) which is something you do when it is under construction.
__________________
Continue the Renaissance |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now, if you want to relocate a lot of businesses, SW 44 and SW 59 need a LOT of help. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Jobs, SW Medical Center Airport Rail Yard Star Buildings Budwieser Plant Kimray |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Mranderson, I'm not saying they don't belong on I-240 (it doesn't say that anywhere in the post), I just don't like the way they fit into it's strip. If they were given some decent space and landscaping (as with Don Pablos, Schlotkzy's etc, on the other side, it would be much better.
Now I took another look today, and I have to say it's not all that bad. There is landscaping for Joe's, but ONLY for Joe's. It doesn't look organic to the rest of the block. Starbucks has some nice patio seating. I just wish there wasn't so much blacktop between the two. Maybe they could landscape the Starbucks frontage with a similar tree plot that Joe's has, at least to provide some continuity.
__________________
Continue the Renaissance |
|
|||
|
I think another reason PetsMart and Burlington are moving from their penn location is because of things like Starbucks, Joe's, Weokie Credit Union, and numerous other businesses being built infront of the strip mall, in the middle of the parking lot, blocking their view from the interstate. Floater is right, they should be built somewhere else.
|
|
||||
|
What would businesses building on pad sites in front of a strip center have to do with a buisnesses decision to relocate? There have been businesses on pad sites LONG before Burlinton and PetSmart located in that strip center.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
I agree on Joe's Crab Shack. It seem's like the kind of restaurant that's usually in a little more upscale location, such as the one on NW Highway next to the lake--somewhere that's not in front of a grocery store and right next to an ugly bank building that casts a shadow on it most of the day. Just my opinion.
|
|
|||
|
A perfect example of pad sites in front of a shopping center is Rockwell Plaza on N.W. Expressway. There are MANY across the metro; too many to mention on this post. It's a good way to build retail density.
|
|
|||
|
I know they have had pad sites infront of strip malls, but if you had a choice between a strip mall hidden from highway view, or one with good visibility, which would you choose?
Last edited by Keith; 07-17-2005 at 09:11 PM. Reason: Calling another member a name. |
|
|||
|
I think what would really help 240 is to bulldoze the apartment complexes that run from the new Party Galaxy store to the 7-11 next to Eskridge. Then build more restaurants and maybe another power center or even a couple nice hotels.
Those apartments are full of nothing but riff-raff. You might be displacing a few elderly and a few disabled people. I know concord is mostly a special needs housing complex. Those people could be provided with relocation assitance. Not to mention the whole is stretch is an eyesore. All four complexes are old run down and have hardly any landscaping or greenspace. You see more asphalt and buildings than you do trees or grass. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The "Gardens" were built in the mid 60's as high end apartments. They were in that category through the 70's and into the 80's. The man who built them is the same man who built Brookwood Village, C.A.(I think that is the middle initial) Henderson. Henderson properties built most of the far southwest side until Mr. Henderson was forced to sell his business. The new company sold "The Gardens" to the current owners, who let them run down. No. They do not need to be demolished. They need to be sold to a company that cares and refurbished. |
|
|||
|
Interesting, a disussion about South OKC and the role of SOKCC and "Economic Development". I have been reading this site (OKC pulse) for a while, most of the dicussion involving "Economic Development" is usually about areas North of the Oklahoma River, including areas in the inner urban, i.e. N.W. 10th, N.W. 16th, Plaza District... Now this post revovles around SOKCC and "Economic Development" on 240/S. Penn. GREAT, the Odom's probably were interested with or without the SOKCC. The shuffling around of properties does not concern me. What does concern me is S. 44th and S. 59th corridors. The new YMCA mentioned in far South OKC caused the Ymca located at S. Penn and 52nd across from Grant High School (Maps project). Hum, Parks-how many know "Woodson Park" at S. May and 33rd is one of the three largest urban Parks, it's virtually ignored. (shame) Bookstore, we do read in the urban South and far South OKC. I read on this site the far North opened a third bookstore, hum. I will end with reference to S. 44th corridor study has been meeting since November '04. The stakeholders include OKC Planning dept., Integris, SOKCC, Integris, Hispanic Chamber, Councilmembers, State officials and interested neighborhoods. If after reading this post you are interested in participating in the S. 44th corridor study, hopefully by bringing "Economic Development" back to the inner-city, contact the OKC Planning department.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OKC grows 4.3% from 2000-2004 | Pete Brzycki | OKC Metro Area Talk | 4 | 07-05-2005 02:28 PM |
| Interesting point of view re: bombing anniversary | kielaaron | OKC Metro Area Talk | 1 | 04-18-2005 09:02 AM |
| Capitol Hill neighborhood redevelopment under way | Proactive Volunteer | OKC Metro Area Talk | 3 | 02-25-2005 09:00 AM |
| Another chance to improve city | Proactive Volunteer | OKC Metro Area Talk | 4 | 11-30-2004 10:21 AM |
| City Leadership IS On-Board with the Renaissance | HOT ROD | OKC Metro Area Talk | 7 | 08-25-2004 07:44 PM |