OKCTalk  

Go Back   OKCTalk > Oklahoma City Forum Central > OKC Metro Area Talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 09:16 PM
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Total Posts: 872
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Quote:
Originally Posted by foodiefan View Post
Re: the utlization (capacity) issue. . .I'm certain thcurrent ALC Commander is well aware of the methodology used by the AF to compute utlization/capacity under the BRAC rules. . . Bottom line. . .you never know what tomorrow will bring, but you'd better not bury your head in the sand when it comes to growth and expansion for the future.
So, of course, you chose to follow the lead of those esteemed county commissioners, eh?

Ah, yes, someone else who drank the Vaughn kool-aid...

That's the whole point of this issue - there's not one shred of proof that so much as one day of additional longevity or one penny's worth of additional employment will come as a result of this boondoggle. Further, we have absolutely no guarantee whatsoever that the funding generated by the increased property taxes will even be used to purchase the GM plant should those benevolent county commissioners discover some other "urgent" project under the heading of "economic development" that needs the funding worse.

Did anyone hear that those same Tinker leaders said it would take "considerable" monies to revamp the plant into something usable, whatever that might be? There's a stairstep implicit here - first, you have to identify the work; then you have to decide if the plant is adequate for it, then you have to assess the cost of retooling it, then you solicit funding for it. That's a loooong way from the "thousands of jobs" the "friends" of Tinker promised.

What is certain is that the poor property-owning saps in Oklahoma County will be zapped with a tax bill to finance this scheme, and they'll never know just whom is truly profiting. If we had a truly investigative news source in Oklahoma, we might find out who the winner in this Ponzi scheme -- the promise of vapor jobs for "just a few pennies" of your hard-earned tax dollars - really is.

And color me skeptical, but I have a sneaking suspicion it isn't gonna be the taxpayers.

Wonder how long before we find Gene Stipe hooked into it somehow :sarcasm
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 09:56 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Total Posts: 104
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

this is sincerely not meant as a cheap shot, but, the best analogy I can come up with is . . .sorry. . . don't have the time, energy, or inclination to explain try and calculus to those haven't yet mastered 3rd grade math. And it doesn't have anything to do with the County Commissioners. . . .it's the business end of the largest single site employer in the State of Oklahoma. Whether you care if it is "government" or not, it's a fact. Further, I'm not into Kool-Ade. . .I'd much prefer Caymus. . .
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:02 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Total Posts: 2,218
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

I'm normally pretty trusting of leaders until they prove otherwise so I see nothing sinister in this plot to defraud the taxpayers of OKC

With a grand total of 3 or 4 major employers in the metro I am all for enhancing the prospects of the largest as long as it's not outrageous...Tinker gets shut down or severely downsized we are all hurting big time
__________________
Dr. Spaceman: Now Jenna, medically speaking for your height your weight puts you what we call the "disgusting" range. Fortunately there are solutions. For example, crystal meth has been shown to be very effective. How important is tooth retention to you?
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:21 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Total Posts: 131
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoonerDave View Post

Did anyone hear that those same Tinker leaders said it would take "considerable" monies to revamp the plant into something usable, whatever that might be? There's a stairstep implicit here - first, you have to identify the work; then you have to decide if the plant is adequate for it, then you have to assess the cost of retooling it, then you solicit funding for it. That's a loooong way from the "thousands of jobs" the "friends" of Tinker promised.

:sarcasm
Yes and those same Tinker officials have publicly committed $100million towards the necessary up grades to the plant in Federal money.

Further there are numerous old buildings currently on Tinker that will be shut down and torn down and the work moved to the facility.

Third, I believe I mentioned this had the endorsement of the Secretary of the Air Force. I DONT believe the Generals and commanders of TINKER would have came out for this without the approval from on high.

Further the Air Force is working towards private sector tenents for the unused portion of the building.

Further General Reno has also went through BRAC closures. And he has publicaly stated the He is NOT worried about another BRac Attack.

Further I would rather believe a current active two star general rather than a retired general that has been removed from several different positions because of his mouth.

Further there were numerous public breifings given which included Tinker officials who supported this acquistion.

Further Bob Conners a retired SES'er from tinker who was the former ALC commander
Quote:
Robert J. Conner, a member of the Senior Executive Service, is Director, Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center, Tinker Air Force Base, Okla. He is responsible for the 72nd Air Base Wing, as well as the center's Combat Sustainment, Aircraft Sustainment and Maintenance wings.
Further, who ya gonna believe..................I chose who I would believe based on the information presented and based on personal knowledge of the truthful nature of the person involved.

Further when the move occurs and the jobs are relocated I will be sure to re-resurect this thread to show you .....you were wrong............maybe.
Time and only time will tell..........
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:23 PM
mmonroe's Avatar
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Total Posts: 845
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Wow, what a grudge.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:28 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Total Posts: 104
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Redskin 70: Plaudits!!
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 11:14 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Total Posts: 481
Default Re: Tinker Bond Vote Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin 70 View Post
To correct some misinformation.
The Senior base commanders Col. Correll was and is in favor of this acquisition. The Two star General on the base , General Reno, wants this deal. the One star General on this base, General Robinson, wants this deal. the Secretary of the Air Force, wants this. Actually numerous area Mayors and cities have came out for this deal.

Now Why would a current serving TWO STAR GENERAL who certainly has more information on the status of Tinker be for a purchase like this and a two star general retired over twenty years be butting heads so publicly?????

Im sorry but I think I will go with the active duty officer at the base......

And lets not forget this self same retired general was dismissed from the Oklahoma CIty chamber of commerce for supporting positions the Chamber did not support.
Sounds and looks to me that he was dismissed for NOT supporting a position on an issue that the Chamber DID support.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 11:53 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Total Posts: 481
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmonroe View Post
Ok... but isn't GM still paying property tax, even if it just sits there?
Yes. But that will soon be a thing of the past.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 12:07 AM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Total Posts: 481
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoonerDave View Post
So, of course, you chose to follow the lead of those esteemed county commissioners, eh?

Ah, yes, someone else who drank the Vaughn kool-aid...

That's the whole point of this issue - there's not one shred of proof that so much as one day of additional longevity or one penny's worth of additional employment will come as a result of this boondoggle. Further, we have absolutely no guarantee whatsoever that the funding generated by the increased property taxes will even be used to purchase the GM plant should those benevolent county commissioners discover some other "urgent" project under the heading of "economic development" that needs the funding worse.

Did anyone hear that those same Tinker leaders said it would take "considerable" monies to revamp the plant into something usable, whatever that might be? There's a stairstep implicit here - first, you have to identify the work; then you have to decide if the plant is adequate for it, then you have to assess the cost of retooling it, then you solicit funding for it. That's a loooong way from the "thousands of jobs" the "friends" of Tinker promised.

What is certain is that the poor property-owning saps in Oklahoma County will be zapped with a tax bill to finance this scheme, and they'll never know just whom is truly profiting. If we had a truly investigative news source in Oklahoma, we might find out who the winner in this Ponzi scheme -- the promise of vapor jobs for "just a few pennies" of your hard-earned tax dollars - really is.

And color me skeptical, but I have a sneaking suspicion it isn't gonna be the taxpayers.

Wonder how long before we find Gene Stipe hooked into it somehow :sarcasm
Yep, this is one scam they can't blame on "ole" Gene. He's not the Vice-Chair of the Chambers Aviation and Aerospace Committee.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 09:52 AM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Total Posts: 425
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmonroe View Post
Ok... but isn't GM still paying property tax, even if it just sits there?

I guess not as of September! So we just did the federal govt a favor AND GM one also (Hey thanks for leaving, GM, let us take this burden off of you now!)
Reply With Quote
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:23 AM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Total Posts: 84
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Follow the money, asks who benefits. 2000 more voters decided a property tax increase was good for all home owners in the city.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:00 AM
mmonroe's Avatar
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Total Posts: 845
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

I bet that 2000 don't even own their own homes...
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:03 AM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Total Posts: 425
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidGlover View Post
Follow the money, asks who benefits. 2000 more voters decided a property tax increase was good for all home owners in the city.
Yeah its not really worth beating a dead horse...its done...still not real happy about it..time to move on though.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:04 AM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Total Posts: 1,016
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidGlover View Post
... 2000 more voters decided a property tax increase was good for all home owners in the city.
Is that a real issue for you David? Would it have been better, or worse, from your perspective, if the outcome of the vote had been based on a majority of 200 or 20,000 rather than 2000?

Like the outcome or hate the outcome, the number who care enough to vote, in either direction, will always have more say than the multitudes who can't turn off the x-box, telly or set aside their freakin' spiderman paint by numbers sets for a mere 20 minutes.
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:08 AM
mmonroe's Avatar
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Total Posts: 845
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinpate View Post
.... freakin' spiderman paint by numbers sets...
Where can I get one?
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:17 AM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Total Posts: 1,016
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

craigslist?
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:25 AM
mmonroe's Avatar
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Total Posts: 845
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

HA!

Maybe we should have put the GM plant on craigslist...
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 01:43 PM
oneforone's Avatar
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Total Posts: 354
Default Re: Tinker Bond Vote Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin 70 View Post
Now Why would a current serving TWO STAR GENERAL who certainly has more information on the status of Tinker be for a purchase like this and a two star general retired over twenty years be butting heads so publicly?????

Im sorry but I think I will go with the active duty officer at the base......

And lets not forget this self same retired general was dismissed from the Oklahoma CIty chamber of commerce for supporting positions the Chamber did not support.
I will tell you why he supported the sTinker vote, the chamber has a nice cushy job or a few "speaking engagements" lined up for him as soon as he retires. Not mention I am sure a nice little thank you kick back is waiting for him after retirement.
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 02:51 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Total Posts: 34
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Deleted
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 07:41 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Total Posts: 84
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Hi Kevin, Nice to see someone using their own name. You are right about the numbers. Majority wins, but so few/by percentage are actually voting. Special elections massively favor special interests. It is for moneyed interest to sway and roll out a small subset of votes to get issues passed that benefit their interest. It is difficult for disparate opposition to battle against these kind of things. I believe if more people understood the issue the outcomes would be different - difficult to change but some of us are working on it.
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 09:00 PM
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Total Posts: 872
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin 70 View Post
Yes and those same Tinker officials have publicly committed $100million towards the necessary up grades to the plant in Federal monies...
.

How could this possibly have been budgeted in the current fiscal year when it wasn't even a proposal more than a couple of months ago?

Also, which upgrades, and when is work scheduled to begin? Which projects are these upgrades going to support at the GM facility? You don't have the answer to that, because you don't know what work - if any - is going there. Therefore you cannot know what kinds of upgrades are going in, and the "$100 million commitment" is a vapor commitment.

Quote:
Further there are numerous old buildings currently on Tinker that will be shut down and torn down and the work moved to the facility.
Oh, I thought the GM plant was being purchased to bring Tinker thousands of new jobs, not just to shift the location of existing jobs.....

Quote:
Further the Air Force is working towards private sector tenents for the unused portion of the building.
This is supposed to make the county's purchase of the GM plant and subsequent gift rental to Tinker sound better??? Listen to yourself - if the objective was to give it to private sector tenants, then county voters just got duped into the sacrifice of perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars in facility rental revenue on top of the loss of property tax revenue formerly headed to the Mid Del school district? Now you've REALLY sold me on just how keen a project this was.
[quote]Further General Reno has also went through BRAC closures[/quote.]

He has never gone through a BRAC round as a Tinker commander.

Quote:
Further I would rather believe a current active two star general rather than a retired general that has been removed from several different positions because of his mouth.
Here we go again, crapping on Burpee. What in the world is your issue with him? His kid beat up yours and steal his lunch money or something? Burpee found hiimself at odds with the Chamber of Commerce because he refused to toe their line on several idiotic positions, and he was right in doing so. He spoke his mind about this most recent boondoggle, and again he was right in doing so.

Quote:
Further when the move occurs and the jobs are relocated I will be sure to re-resurect this thread to show you .....you were wrong............maybe.
Time and only time will tell..........
If your buddies come through with the "thousands" of new jobs they promised in their advertising, you'll have every right to do so. But I'm not worried, because it isn't going to happen. And when that fails, your buddy Ray Vaughn and his minions won't have one shred of accountability for the Brooklyn Bridge they've sold the taxpayers.

Hey, I hope lots of jobs DO come here. But you've just said yourself they're going to transfer existing jobs in and fill the rest of the space with private sector tenants - doesn't sound like even a fraction of the "thousands of new jobs" your buddies promised. I'd love to think your idealized faith in our local county leaders were merited.

As someone else has pointed out, this debate is pointless, the vote has been taken, and everyone in Oklahoma county gets to foot the bill for this nonsense. Won't matter one penny to me, because I don't live in Oklahoma county, but scams like this still frustrate and annoy me to no end, for they prove that good ol' boy politics is alive and well.
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:37 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Total Posts: 131
Default Re: Tinker Bond Vote Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by oneforone View Post
I will tell you why he supported the sTinker vote, the chamber has a nice cushy job or a few "speaking engagements" lined up for him as soon as he retires. Not mention I am sure a nice little thank you kick back is waiting for him after retirement.
Oh pleezzeeee and next we have the sequel of the "Sky is falling"
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:47 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Total Posts: 131
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

[quote=SoonerDave;143358].
Here we go again, crapping on Burpee. What in the world is your issue with him? His kid beat up yours and steal his lunch money or something? [/i]

Dont think so. Son was 10th SF so I doubt a airforce wennie kid could do that.

You have an anger problem perhaps??????????? Or just dont like being contradicted????????

Quote:
The Air Force announced recently it is prepared to spend up to $100 million on moving operations to the plant and modifying the building for military manufacturing and repair uses
Tinker brass forecasting 5-year move to GM plant | NewsOK.com

See............Theres the commitment....Its in the paper.

Now back to the original premise.
Your argument is fallacious so you resort to retorts so childish as the above................
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 11:18 PM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Total Posts: 194
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 04:04 AM
Participating Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Total Posts: 481
Default Re: Tinker bond passes

Did anyone else happen to read the May 15th article by Bryan Dean? It was on the front page of the DOK Business section and titled, "Land use may put Tinker at risk". The jest of the story deals with the intent of City Officials in Del City to move forward with a plan, that would allow a proposed retail development to be built in an "Accident Protection Zone" located near I-40 and Sooner Road.

The proposed development will be too close to a runway at T.A.F.B. and would put the base at risk of being CLOSED. How crazy is that? Although I live in OKC, I also live in Clevland County. Thank God. But I would still feel sorry for, and hate to see you Oklahoma Countians spend $55,000,000. for nothing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tinker Bond Issue 2008 mmonroe Talk Across The State 29 05-08-2008 03:56 PM
$736 million upcoming bond vote for roads and other projects Pete Brzycki OKC Metro Area Talk 9 04-25-2007 07:27 PM
State bond issue for higher education passes Patrick The Chalk Board 1 03-30-2005 10:17 AM
Senate passes 500 million dollar lottery bond Midtowner The Chalk Board 12 03-02-2005 06:06 PM
Bond issue planned for state universities Patrick OKC Metro Area Talk 12 01-07-2005 02:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 AM.