Page 35 of 154 FirstFirst ... 25262728293031323334353637383940414243444585135 ... LastLast
Results 851 to 875 of 3849
Like Tree2748Likes

Thread: OKC Mayor Race 2014

  1. #851
    PhiAlpha's Avatar
    PhiAlpha is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,282

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Go to downtown Amarillo sometime... It's very arguably nicer than OKC was back then. 4-7 restaurant/bars, one nice new hotel, a bunch of abandoned buildings and a ton of surface parking. This from a city with a little under 250,000 people. There downtown is experiencing a mini renessance and is actually kinda cool for what it is, but it definitely is similar (but better than) OKC in the late 80s early 90s.

  2. #852
    krisb's Avatar
    krisb is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    419

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Bellaboo View Post
    Answer this krisb, why would anyone support some guy who wants to stop (and possibly retreat from) the incredible transformation we've had ?

    That just doesn't make good sense.....
    I have never heard Ed say that he is against MAPS or the transformation of the city. He has been critical of some aspects of the MAPS 3 process, that is different. The straw man you're trying to beat up has more brains than you think.

  3. #853
    PhiAlpha's Avatar
    PhiAlpha is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,282

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Not sure Christopher's made it into the 90's. Or the Wine Cellar or Newport.

    Anyway, the point being things were *bad* and MAPS was nothing short of a minor miracle.

    To try and tear it down now when the investment has been repaid in literally incalculable amounts and ways... Well, that's shear lunacy.
    Dont forget Joe Kelly's, now part of the chaparral campus.

  4. #854
    PhiAlpha's Avatar
    PhiAlpha is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,282

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Not sure Christopher's made it into the 90's. Or the Wine Cellar or Newport.

    Anyway, the point being things were *bad* and MAPS was nothing short of a minor miracle.

    To try and tear it down now when the investment has been repaid in literally incalculable amounts and ways... Well, that's shear lunacy.
    Don't forget Joe Kelly's, now part of the chaparral campus.

  5. #855
    Bellaboo's Avatar
    Bellaboo is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,474

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by krisb View Post
    I have never heard Ed say that he is against MAPS or the transformation of the city. He has been critical of some aspects of the MAPS 3 process, that is different. The straw man you're trying to beat up has more brains than you think.
    The dedicated straw man with brains didn't even VOTE one way or the other on MAPS 3. When the majority on this board favored him a couple of years back, they posted a link of him giving some kind of rebuttal on the shoe. I took the 20 minutes of my time and watched with interest. He walked all over himself, was somewhat feeble in his questioning...and then he backed off.... I said to myself, what the heck do people see in him ? But what got under my skin is him questioning a dedicated zoo tax voted on by the people, and now he's questioning MAPS 3 in the same regard......... how much 'brains' does he have...... being a surgeon he has some, but politically, his approach is very much in question. It's hard to vote against Mick when you know what you're going to get, but with Ed, who in the hell knows...?

    I guess when Ed speaks, you're going to hear what you want to hear.
    king183 likes this.

  6. #856
    PhiAlpha's Avatar
    PhiAlpha is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,282

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by krisb View Post
    I have never heard Ed say that he is against MAPS or the transformation of the city. He has been critical of some aspects of the MAPS 3 process, that is different. The straw man you're trying to beat up has more brains than you think.
    So he hasn't ever said he's against MAPS, but what do his actions say? Getting an attorney to threaten to file a lawsuit seeking an injunction against MAPS and questing its constitutionality 4 years after the vote say plenty.
    boscorama likes this.

  7. #857
    betts's Avatar
    betts is offline Platinum Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,496

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    If you're willing to sacrifice MAPS on the altar of political expediency, then you're not a steward of your citizens. If you are willing to ignore or throw out decisions made by the citizens of the city you claim to represent, then you're not doing your job correctly. I don't want a mayor who doesn't care what we as citizens value. We expended a lot of energy supporting MAPS 3. A lot of people (Ed not included) acted as responsible citizens and voted. And he's willing to act as if that (and by extension we) doesn't/don't matter.
    soonerguru likes this.

  8. #858
    CaptDave is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by krisb View Post
    I have never heard Ed say that he is against MAPS or the transformation of the city. He has been critical of some aspects of the MAPS 3 process, that is different. The straw man you're trying to beat up has more brains than you think.
    With some of his recent actions, no words are needed. (But I still haven't watched last week's council meeting....I've heard Ed made some sort of statement about MAPS) No one thinks Ed is unintelligent; I've mainly heard people express disappointment and disillusionment.

  9. #859
    Pete's Avatar
    Pete is online now Owner / Administrator
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,673

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    Don't forget Joe Kelly's, now part of the chaparral campus.
    It was a cool spot but didn't last long. Doubt it made it to the 90's, either.

  10. #860
    Urban Pioneer is online now Platinum Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by krisb View Post
    The straw man you're trying to beat up has more brains than you think.

    Not political ones. Ed needs to learn how to work with people and respect those with a different opinions rather than constantly embarking on subversive negative innuendo campaigns.

  11. #861
    soonerguru is offline Platinum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    6,230

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    So he hasn't ever said he's against MAPS, but what do his actions say? Getting an attorney to threaten to file a lawsuit seeking an injunction against MAPS and questing its constitutionality 4 years after the vote say plenty.
    Actions speak louder than words. My only hesitation in supporting Shadid during his Council campaign were my lingering, nagging doubts about 1) his support of MAPS, 2) his apparent alignment with the unions (whom I would normally support but with whom I had lost respect after their campaign against MAPS), and 3) his weird diatribes against the business community.

    Ultimately I reconciled my concerns after Shadid pledged to support the MAPS 3 vote. Then, suddenly, he turned his back on his campaign position about a year ago and I learned the hard way that he doesn't keep his word. He very much used the grass roots base of the Streetcar initiative to get elected and then turned his back on the Streetcar.

    The man has proven to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that he cannot be trusted.

    Today's announcement that the hub is getting Federal support blows up one of his cental lies: namely that the Streetcar would not receive federal funding. Now we find out we're getting $13 million from the Obama Administration to build a first-class transit hub, and we learn we would have been nowhere in the running for this federal support had we not passed the MAPS 3 vote to fund the Streetcar and Hub expansion.

    Ed has been extremely duplicitous in his comments on this very public vote and process, and he should be ashamed. At this point, he is only a hindrance to expanding transit in Central Oklahoma, and furthermore, short of issuing easily debunked arguments against MAPS 3, he has exerted no leadership to get anything done for transit. Nothing.

  12. #862
    PhiAlpha's Avatar
    PhiAlpha is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,282

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by soonerguru View Post
    Actions speak louder than words. My only hesitation in supporting Shadid during his Council campaign were my lingering, nagging doubts about 1) his support of MAPS, 2) his apparent alignment with the unions (whom I would normally support but with whom I had lost respect after their campaign against MAPS), and 3) his weird diatribes against the business community.

    Ultimately I reconciled my concerns after Shadid pledged to support the MAPS 3 vote. Then, suddenly, he turned his back on his campaign position about a year ago and I learned the hard way that he doesn't keep his word. He very much used the grass roots base of the Streetcar initiative to get elected and then turned his back on the Streetcar.

    The man has proven to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that he cannot be trusted.

    Today's announcement that the hub is getting Federal support blows up one of his cental lies: namely that the Streetcar would not receive federal funding. Now we find out we're getting $13 million from the Obama Administration to build a first-class transit hub, and we learn we would have been nowhere in the running for this federal support had we not passed the MAPS 3 vote to fund the Streetcar and Hub expansion.

    Ed has been extremely duplicitous in his comments on this very public vote and process, and he should be ashamed. At this point, he is only a hindrance to expanding transit in Central Oklahoma, and furthermore, short of issuing easily debunked arguments against MAPS 3, he has exerted no leadership to get anything done for transit. Nothing.
    Exactly

  13. #863
    CaptDave is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    And thanks to the efforts of people who cared enough about OKC transit to actually come up with a plan and follow through on it, OKC is now being recognized as being serious about improving transit. Despite several rather deceitful statements and actions designed to divide transit supporters, the USDOT has now approved the first of hopefully several TIGER Grants to support the people actually making a difference rather than doing nothing more than criticizing. If you are not going to offer a plan, you are not part of the solution.

    I think this is appropriate for this mayoral race:

    “It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”


    ― Theodore Roosevelt
    cafeboeuf, betts and PhiAlpha like this.

  14. #864
    Urban Pioneer is online now Platinum Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    From Steve's chat today- OKC Central Chat transcript, Sept. 6, 2013 | News OK BTW, it was a really good chat session Steve.

    Guest 10:11 a.m. Hello steve what is the latest with the maps 3 protest from attorney slane will this derail maps 3 and is maps 3 pass a constitutional test thanks. You would have thought okc would have checked this out before they put it on the ballot or is this political movement from a mayor wanna be


    Steve Lackmeyer 10:17 a.m. City Attorney Kenny Jordan replied with information that would indicate the ballot is not unconsitutional. David Slane has since told local reporters he is re-evaluating whether he will proceed with the lawsuit. The public response to Slane was very negative, and rightly or wrongly, his connection to councilman and mayoral candidate Ed Shadid through consultant Andrew Speno (who also represents longtime MAPS 3 opponents at the FOP) has sparked some criticism against Shadid. There is no evidence that I know of showing there's a coordinated effort between Slane and Shadid, but critics note Shadid was quite vocal against the ballot in comments at the city council meeting just a couple days before Slane's representatives contacted reporters and he announced his intentions to sue the city over the ballot.
    betts and HOT ROD like this.

  15. #865
    Larry OKC is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5,884

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Midtowner View Post
    They're not at all different.

    The test is germaneness. If the provisions are germane, relative, and cognate to a readily apparent common theme and purpose, the provisions are related to a single subject. The most relevant questions under this analysis are whether a voter is: 1) able to make a choice without being misled; and 2) forced to choose between two unrelated provisions contained in one measure.

    Who was being misled here? This was a tax for capital improvements. Just like a tax for public safety, someone has to decide how much to spend on what. Would you tell me that the public safety tax was constitutional because they really didn't know how many police radios or walkie talkies they'd buy? Or would you argue it's not constitutional because the public wasn't given a choice to vote for Motorola radios and Ford cruisers instead of Chryslers?

    Slane's lawsuit is a dog that won't hunt.
    the difference is that with a tax for Public Safety, it is much more restrictive and well defined than the vague, overly broad and nearly all-encompassing generic "capital improvements" label. Please read the Ballot & Ordinance and tell me exactly what it CAN'T be spent on. Tell me if the Council can or can not change their intent and transfer funds from one project to another, decide not to do a project al all etc. Also, if not mistake, the Public Safety tax and Bond Issue taxes go into a rather lot of detail about the projects. Consider Proposition 1 of the 2007 bond issue:
    http://www.okc.gov/bonds2007/
    PROPOSITION 1 (STREETS)
    Because street repair was your #1 priority in the last two citizen surveys, more than half of the funds in the bond program are earmarked for street improvements. This proposition finances resurfacing, widening and rebuilding of more than 750 lane miles of streets, mostly in residential areas. Walkers will also benefit from the construction of 350 miles of sidewalks and trails.
    but it doesn't stop there, generic descriptions but goes into specific detail...
    PROPOSITION 1 (STREETS) / Section - Resurfacing

    A. Resurfacing, repair, rehabilitation, and/or improvements of the streets located in the areas bounded by the following described streets, which may include related engineering, traffic control signals, signs, markings, devices, conduit and improvements, street lighting, drainage, intersection improvements, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, sidewalk repair and/or installation, to-wit:


    Number Limits Estimate
    1 Council Road, Rockwell Avenue, Hefner Road to Britton Road $5,691,000
    2 Meridian Avenue, Portland Avenue, NW 50th Street, NW 36th Street $5,199,000
    3 Meridian Avenue, Portland Avenue, NW 36th Street, NW 23rd Street $6,823,000
    4 Western Avenue , Santa Fe Avenue, NW 63rd Street, NW 50th Street $3,766,000
    5 Portland Avenue, May Avenue, NW 63rd Street, NW 50th Street $4,403,000
    6 May Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 50th Street, NW 36th Street $7,816,000
    7 Pennsylvania Avenue, Western Avenue , NW 63rd Street, NW 50th Street $3,836,000
    8 Pennsylvania Avenue, Western Avenue , SW 44th Street, SW 59th Street $7,675,000
    9 MacArthur Boulevard, Meridian Avenue, NW 23rd Street, NW 10th Street $4,601,000
    10 Meridian Avenue, Portland Avenue, SW 15th Street, SW 29th Street $2,783,000
    11 Sara Road, Morgan Road, SW 15th Street, SW 29th Street $3,717,000
    12 Rockwell Avenue, MacArthur Boulevard, NW 23rd Street, NW 10th Street $2,852,000
    13 Douglas Avenue, Post Road, SE 29th Street, SE 44th Street $1,643,000
    14 Anderson Road, Hiwassee Road, SE 74th Street, SE 89th Street $1,074,000
    15 Eastern Avenue, Bryant Avenue, SE 89th Street, SE 104th Street $1,855,000
    16 Western Avenue , Santa Fe Avenue, SW 44th Street, SW 59th Street $6,595,000
    17 Pennsylvania Avenue, Western Avenue SW 89th Street, SW 104th Street $5,801,000
    18 Western Avenue , Santa Fe Avenue, SW 134th Street, SW 149th Street $2,575,000
    19 Western Avenue , I-235, NW 23rd Street, NW 10th Street $8,767,000
    20 Portland Avenue, May Avenue, Reno Avenue, SW 15th Street $2,370,000
    21 May Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue, SW 15th Street, SW 29th Street $5,986,000
    22 Pennsylvania Avenue, Western Avenue , SW 15th Street, SW 29th Street $6,446,000
    23 Eastern Avenue, Bryant Avenue, SE 29th Street, SE 44th Street $3,049,000
    24 Bryant Avenue, Coltrane Road, Memorial Road, City Limits $2,298,000
    25 Santa Fe Avenue, Kelley Avenue, NE 63rd Street, NE 50th Street $4,779,000
    26 Kelley Avenue, ML KING, NE 23rd Street, NE 10TH $8,830,000
    27 Meridian Avenue, Portland Avenue, Memorial Road, NW 122nd Street $4,610,000
    28 May Avenue, City Limits, Britton Road, Wilshire Boulevard $1,847,000
    29 May Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 122nd Street, Hefner Road $7,242,000
    30 The northern one-half section bounded by Mustang Road, Czech Hall Road, Reno Avenue $2,643,000
    31 May Avenue, I-44, South Grand Boulevard, SW 59th Street $5,555,000
    Total: $143,127,000
    The same is true for the most, if not all of the other Propositions and subparts. What did we get in the MAPS 3 Ballot/Ordinance? Do you see ANY of the projects listed? Are ANY details about the projects mentioned? No & No.

    I would imagine that the Public Safety tax had similar details but haven't looked for it myself lately, I may do so later. But IIRC, it mentioned exactly what the money would be spent for. While maybe not down to the brand, make & model and number of the walkie-talkies, it most likely had the amount earmarked for such purposes. If I am wrong, please post. If it did as you say, then yes, the Public Safety tax may also be unconstitutional.

    What you described (in bold) is what happened, you seem to be arguing my point...Voters were misled into thinking that the all-or-nothing ballot was the only option the City had. And they were forced to choose, either vote for or against all of the unrelated projects. A couple of the items were probably similar enough to be considered "like-kind" and could have been lumped together as 1 proposition (but if any doubt, the safest recourse is to list them separately), but others certainly required a separate proposition of their own. For example, the Convention Center has absolutely nothing in common with Senior Aquatic Centers. And while there may be some benefit of one project to another (like the Streetcars connecting as many of the other projects together), their success or failure isn't entirely dependent on the other (unlike the Convention Center and the unfunded C.C. hotel).

  16. #866
    kevinpate's Avatar
    kevinpate is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    11,730

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    But Larry, neither you, nor any other MAPs3 voter, voted yea or nay on a civic center. Nor did you vote up or down on a list of projects. You just didn't do that. you voted yea or nay on whether there would be a temporary 1 cent sales tax for X months with that sales tax being dedicated to capital improvements.

    The only people who voted yea or nay on a specific list of projects were the elected council folk, sitting at the horseshoe.

  17. #867
    cafeboeuf is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,611

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry OKC View Post
    the difference is that with a tax for Public Safety, it is much more restrictive and well defined than the vague, overly broad and nearly all-encompassing generic "capital improvements" label. Please read the Ballot & Ordinance and tell me exactly what it CAN'T be spent on. Tell me if the Council can or can not change their intent and transfer funds from one project to another, decide not to do a project al all etc. Also, if not mistake, the Public Safety tax and Bond Issue taxes go into a rather lot of detail about the projects. Consider Proposition 1 of the 2007 bond issue:
    The City of Oklahoma City - 2007 City Bond Election

    but it doesn't stop there, generic descriptions but goes into specific detail...

    The same is true for the most, if not all of the other Propositions and subparts. What did we get in the MAPS 3 Ballot/Ordinance? Do you see ANY of the projects listed? Are ANY details about the projects mentioned? No & No.

    I would imagine that the Public Safety tax had similar details but haven't looked for it myself lately, I may do so later. But IIRC, it mentioned exactly what the money would be spent for. While maybe not down to the brand, make & model and number of the walkie-talkies, it most likely had the amount earmarked for such purposes. If I am wrong, please post. If it did as you say, then yes, the Public Safety tax may also be unconstitutional.

    What you described (in bold) is what happened, you seem to be arguing my point...Voters were misled into thinking that the all-or-nothing ballot was the only option the City had. And they were forced to choose, either vote for or against all of the unrelated projects. A couple of the items were probably similar enough to be considered "like-kind" and could have been lumped together as 1 proposition (but if any doubt, the safest recourse is to list them separately), but others certainly required a separate proposition of their own. For example, the Convention Center has absolutely nothing in common with Senior Aquatic Centers. And while there may be some benefit of one project to another (like the Streetcars connecting as many of the other projects together), their success or failure isn't entirely dependent on the other (unlike the Convention Center and the unfunded C.C. hotel).
    Bond Elections have different statutory requirements than Tax Elections, I believe. I'm not an expert, but in my time working on the 2007 GOB Election, I recall hearing that we had very specific requirements that had to be met for the ballot, and the approval required. That may be another reason the ballot list was so extensive.
    SoonerDave likes this.

  18. #868
    Midtowner's Avatar
    Midtowner is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,872

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry OKC View Post
    the difference is that with a tax for Public Safety, it is much more restrictive and well defined than the vague, overly broad and nearly all-encompassing generic "capital improvements" label. Please read the Ballot & Ordinance and tell me exactly what it CAN'T be spent on. Tell me if the Council can or can not change their intent and transfer funds from one project to another, decide not to do a project al all etc. Also, if not mistake, the Public Safety tax and Bond Issue taxes go into a rather lot of detail about the projects. Consider Proposition 1 of the 2007 bond issue:
    The City of Oklahoma City - 2007 City Bond Election
    So what law school did you go to again?

    That said, there is nothing misleading about being labeled "capital improvements." Capital improvements can certainly mean an awful lot, but it's in no way misleading. There was full public debate about the fact that this was open-ended and a future Council could hypothetically redirect everything to other projects. The 2007 bonds were a different story entirely. Of course the biggest difference between a tax and a bond is that a tax is not a bond and a bond is not a tax. The law is very specific about encumbering the government for periods of more than a year. You have to have a vote of the people to do so unless it's (IIRC) a coach or a school administrator.

    As to my point about public safety, we currently pay .75% for a specially dedicated public safety tax above and beyond the 2% general collection. That public safety tax can be used to buy anything public safety related. From hose trucks to radios to zip ties to whatever. It's just an open-ended funding source, much like MAPS III. MAPS III did have some projects which were put forward, but the Council is in no way bound, having only passed a non-binding resolution to build them, to do anything. Thus, when the voters approved a 1-cent tax for capitol (capital too!) improvements, it's exactly the same as a special .75 going to public safety.... I mean that's police AND fire (two things, OMG!)

    The same is true for the most, if not all of the other Propositions and subparts. What did we get in the MAPS 3 Ballot/Ordinance? Do you see ANY of the projects listed? Are ANY details about the projects mentioned? No & No.
    No, we saw a single subject.

    I would imagine that the Public Safety tax had similar details but haven't looked for it myself lately, I may do so later. But IIRC, it mentioned exactly what the money would be spent for. While maybe not down to the brand, make & model and number of the walkie-talkies, it most likely had the amount earmarked for such purposes. If I am wrong, please post. If it did as you say, then yes, the Public Safety tax may also be unconstitutional.
    I looked into it. It is split just about evenly by police and fire on various things including salaries, capital improvements (and capitol improvements!), cars and whatnot. Here's a report from FY07-08. If nothing has changed (and I don't imagine it has), this should explain what you need to know:

    http://www.okc.gov/auditor/08-02%20P...%206-30-08.pdf

    What you described (in bold) is what happened, you seem to be arguing my point...
    Uh.. no. I'll tell you if I'm arguing your point. Okay? I'll make it very clear.

    Voters were misled into thinking that the all-or-nothing ballot was the only option the City had. And they were forced to choose, either vote for or against all of the unrelated projects.
    That's your argument. That's not what I recall. If they actually read the very plain text of the ballot or not been in a cave when the Gazette, Oklahoman and news channels were covering this issue in depth, or if they listened to the "NOT THIS MAPS" blather, they would have certainly understood everything there was to know about this ballot. In the legal world, you can't sign something with very clear language on it and then later claim you were misled. This argument for you is based on some sort of fantasy. It is most definitely not what happened or how a court will look at what happened.

    A couple of the items were probably similar enough to be considered "like-kind" and could have been lumped together as 1 proposition (but if any doubt, the safest recourse is to list them separately), but others certainly required a separate proposition of their own. For example, the Convention Center has absolutely nothing in common with Senior Aquatic Centers.
    Au contraire, mon ami. Both are capitol (AND CAPITAL!) improvements.

  19. #869
    soonerguru is offline Platinum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    6,230

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by krisb View Post
    I have never heard Ed say that he is against MAPS or the transformation of the city. He has been critical of some aspects of the MAPS 3 process, that is different. The straw man you're trying to beat up has more brains than you think.
    Bull****. He threatened to sue the city to stop it. We're not this stupid.

  20. #870
    Hunt4Mayor is offline Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    43

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    I've got some hilarious tricks up my sleeve. Get ready, morons.

  21. #871
    betts's Avatar
    betts is offline Platinum Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,496

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunt4Mayor View Post
    I've got some hilarious tricks up my sleeve. Get ready, morons.
    Didn't you move away? Weren't you banned here? I do not remember you ever saying anything particularly clever or amusing.

  22. #872
    CuatrodeMayo's Avatar
    CuatrodeMayo is online now Andrew Stewart
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,261

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunt4Mayor View Post
    I've got some hilarious tricks up my sleeve. Get ready, morons.
    If those tricks involve making taco shells out of chips other than Doritos, then no thanks.
    kevinpate likes this.

  23. #873
    Midtowner's Avatar
    Midtowner is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,872

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunt4Mayor View Post
    I've got some hilarious tricks up my sleeve. Get ready, morons.
    Welcome back. What do you have to add to this conversation? Does Taco Bell have a new flavor of taco you'd like to tell us about?

    Innocent jibes aside, I'm not sure someone whose recent work experience includes such fancy gigs as retail (which was a cool job for me when I was 16) has much to offer. Most of us thought your run for mayor was just delusional. You might have had a better chance getting elected to the legislature. They actually LOVE crazy people with no relevant experience to prepare them for that job.

    I thought we'd seen the last of Hunt4Mayor. We all thought his flounce from this city would be permanent. He's back though and wanting more. Dr. Shadid's campaign needs more delusional folks to prop it up. Really. We're all cheering for you. Go volunteer.

  24. #874
    Laramie's Avatar
    Laramie is offline Participating Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,659

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunt4Mayor View Post
    I've got some hilarious tricks up my sleeve. Get ready, morons.
    LMAO! Don't make yourself disappear...

  25. #875
    Bellaboo's Avatar
    Bellaboo is offline Gold Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,474

    Default Re: OKC Mayor Race 2014

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunt4Mayor View Post
    I've got some hilarious tricks up my sleeve. Get ready, morons.
    Moron ? Takes a moron to know a moron.....I suppose.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Ed Shadid running for Mayor 2014!
    By progressiveboy in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 368
    Last Post: 07-02-2013, 04:19 AM
  2. Q&A with 2010 World Mayor runner-up, Mayor Mick Cornett
    By CaseyCornett in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-09-2010, 11:38 AM
  3. Race and Ethnicity map in OKC
    By soonerfan_in_okc in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 10-04-2010, 02:52 PM
  4. Mayor race March 7th
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 02-27-2006, 09:12 AM
  5. Strong-Mayor Form of Government For OKC
    By xrayman in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-24-2005, 09:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1