Quote:
Originally Posted by OKCGUY3
The flashpoint segment was one sided. Usually there are two people debating the issue at hand. However on this issue, Mayor Cornett and Past Mayor Humphreys were given mostly free reign to talk about their side of the issue. Wouldn't it have been more true to the name of the segment if there were representatives of both sides there to debate the issue. Why haven't we seen a debate of that kind? As for the NOT THIS MAPS campaign, I believe that the group wants all of the fine projects to be completed and the City of OKC to keep moving forward. The word "THIS" in their slogan insenuates that point. They have a problem with how the ballot is writton. Very vague on what the money will be spent on, approximate costs, and of course, no exlusive aid to the infrastructure or public safety. Before you say that the mayor has addressed that through the use tax offer to the unions, you need to understand that the offer was only for one year. Meaning that after that one year, there would be NO guaranty of ANY further assistance from the use tax. If this MAPS fails, I am positive that a more detailed ballot with more detailed accountability of the money would be presented and fully supported by the Unions.
|
As to the emphasized part, above, union representatives have said both that they do, and they don't, like the items involved with the MAPS 3 ballot ... they have been inconsistent. I didn't get around to writing summaries yet, but if you listen to the 11/13 audio at
Doug Dawgz Blog: The Great MAPS 3 Debate you will hear very specific objections not only as to the lack of a guaranty but also specific condemnations of the items being (1) unneeded and (2) too costly.
And, thanks, OKCGuy3.