Quote:
|
Originally Posted by windowphobe
More precisely, her then-husband said that she said that. There is no corroboration elsewhere.
And if a simple plastic feeding tube constitutes "machinery," then clearly my ability to produce a peanut-butter-and-jelly sandwich qualifies me for a chef's position.
This is an execution, plain and simple. And here's the methodology for it:
http://thrownback.blogspot.com/2005_...18109408509082 |
Unless he really had a strong belief and emotional reason to stay in like this, he would have taken one of the several million plus dollar offers, gotten a divorce, signed over the guardianship to her parents, and moved on with his life. I just don't see why he would fight this fight just because he wanted to kill her. That'd be very puzzling.
Actually, she doesn't have the ability to chew and swallow. They did try to ween her from the feeding tube at one point, but it didn't work. She's that severely brain damaged.
Letting nature take its course is not execution. From your statement, it would logically follow that anyone that signed a "Do not resuscitate" Order wished to be executed. Execution would involve changing her body in such a way that it couldn't survive. In this case, they are just removing the artificial means by which life was preserved.