Tinker, which has been in operation since 1941, has a lot to do with those figures. Why fault OKC for decisions made at the federal level, especially when they benefit the surrounding communities so well?

Suppose BRAC helps Tinker gain more jobs. Is that OKC's fault?

I didn't favor the GM aquisition under the proposed vote, but here's something else to consider: Suppose, as a result of the GM aquisition, Tinker does add more positions. Wouldn't that be the effect of the OK county voting public?

As for the state jobs, that's a different story. All I can say is, be careful throwing Tinker around in those numbers. The federal government chose the site over 60 years ago and OKC has embraced and supported the base in every way. If, as a result of BRAC or the GM aquisition, Tinker does gain new jobs, it's not because the state is choosing OKC over Tulsa.

__________________
...this shortest straw has been pulled for you