The blog posting at Doug Dawgz blog was what I was referring to in my mini rant. I have seen several articles talking about how Shultz's lawsuit has "legs" or "teeth" yet there is nothing to go with it. All the lawyer "experts" talk about are the emails, never anything about the merits that must be met. Everything that I have read using lawyer "speak" ie: what must he prove and to what degree of proof; says Shultz has no chance. I guess that would not make for good reading.