Nathaniele,
In my humble opinion, unless these espn "experts" cite any relevant case law to back their argument, then they are full of it. If someone is a legal expert why not cite several examples using case law on how Shultz's lawsuit has a 50-60% chance. It should be very easy since they are "experts". Unless they are only pandering to increase readership. All I have seen posted with case law is how the Shultz lawsuit is D.O.A. Courts are built upon case law and the evidence and I have seen many experts fail to report on this.
On a side note, I read a Seattle news report on how the Shultz lawsuit "has legs". The legal expert says the emails and other evidence "COULD BE enough for Schultz to get a HEARING on the merits of the case"....... Even the Seattle lawyer is not willing to say the lawsuit is good enough to go to trial. The ESPN writer even starts his report with how the lawsuit is a long shot.

All of the Washington/Seattle politicians are loving how this has taken the pressure off of them to do anything regarding an arena. How many people are talking about getting an arena deal done?