Quote:
Originally Posted by Midtowner
I could probably come up with a good legal response to that, but that'd take more effort than I have energy for -- and maybe even some research. Sure, I suppose OKC could figure out some legal theory to sue on, but who they'd be able to sue (and who they'd actually sue, because no way does the City Attorney go after our city's 'favorite sons').
I'm not too sure what that theory would be other than breach of the lease or detrimental reliance or something to that effect, like I said, the sweep of the equitable powers of the federal judge are broad and to even begin to intelligently answer the question, we'd have to have a crystal ball and see what sort of equitable remedy she'd come up with in the unlikely event that this case is a winner.
|
So if the judge rules in favor of Schultz would he have to pay back the money to PBC? Or place the money in the trust? I can't see him getting the sale reversed and keeping the money too.